User talk:PeacePeace: Difference between revisions
Ian.thomson (talk | contribs) →Discretionary sanctions notification: new section |
→Discretionary sanctions alert: new section |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Discussing streamlining US cannabis articles== |
==Discussing streamlining US cannabis articles== |
||
Your comments appreciated here: [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Do_we_need_to_do_some_consolidation_of_multiple_overlapping_US_cannabis_articles.3F]]. [[User:Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney|Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney]] ([[User talk:Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney|talk]]) 22:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC) |
Your comments appreciated here: [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Do_we_need_to_do_some_consolidation_of_multiple_overlapping_US_cannabis_articles.3F]]. [[User:Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney|Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney]] ([[User talk:Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney|talk]]) 22:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC) |
||
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:User:PeacePeace]]== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]] |
|||
A tag has been placed on [[:User:PeacePeace]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#U5|section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that [[WP:NOTWEBHOST|Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service]]. Under the [[WP:CSD#User pages|criteria for speedy deletion]], such pages may be deleted at any time. |
|||
⚫ | |||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:User:PeacePeace|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=User%3APeacePeace|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request [[WP:RFUD|here]]. <!-- Template:Db-notwebhost-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">[[User:General Ization|<span style="color: #006633;">General <i>Ization</i></span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:General Ization|<i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i>]] </sup> 17:14, 4 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
||
You have recently shown interest in the |
You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[WP:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect: any administrator may impose [[WP:AC/DS#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or any [[WP:AC/DS#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. |
||
For additional information, please see the [[WP:AC/DS#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[WP:ArbCom|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/ |
For additional information, please see the [[WP:AC/DS#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[WP:ArbCom|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
||
}} [[User: |
}} [[User:Objective3000|O3000]] ([[User talk:Objective3000|talk]]) 17:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC){{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
Revision as of 17:23, 4 November 2018
May Everyone Who Posts Here Find Peace
Blessed are the peacemakers. (PeacePeace (talk) 18:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC))
Notice to Anyone Who Comes Here and Makes a False Attack
I probably will not give you an answer. I wish peace with all. I avoid making personal attacks, though I have endured them from others here. If you come here wanting to fight or attack me, I will probably just erase it and move on, still wishing you the best. So realize if you have come here to make a false attack on me, you already have gotten your answer here. (PeacePeace (talk) 04:08, 18 August 2016 (UTC))
If you are a Wikipedia aristocrat, a Wikipedia noble
If you are a Wikipedia administrator (or higher) come to post something on my talk page, please do me the favor of identifying yourself as such. And realize that I understand that Wikipedia is an aristocracy, & it does no good for me as a peasant entry level editor to argue with you or to defend myself if you came here to bully me or to impose your POV on me. I also realize that if I should complain about someone posting defamatory comments about myself or of lying in claiming I attacked someone (when I did not), the response (from a bully) is likely to be that I am at fault for claiming defamation instead of the person who defamed me for defaming me. So it is unlikely to accomplish anything positive for myself by posting a defense. So please understand why I generally avoid defending myself against such unjust charges here. My lack of defense does not mean that I accept a false charge. Of course it is also possible that someone may come here to give constructive criticism -- in which case I thank you for it. (PeacePeace (talk) 17:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC))
Discussing streamlining US cannabis articles
Your comments appreciated here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Do_we_need_to_do_some_consolidation_of_multiple_overlapping_US_cannabis_articles.3F. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 22:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:PeacePeace
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on User:PeacePeace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. General Ization Talk 17:14, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.