Jump to content

User talk:つがる: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Boing! said Zebedee2 (talk) to last version by AnomieBOT
Line 116: Line 116:
:::::::Where do I talk to you than? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:ItAwesome49FX|ItAwesome49FX]] ([[User talk:ItAwesome49FX#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ItAwesome49FX|contribs]]) </small>
:::::::Where do I talk to you than? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:ItAwesome49FX|ItAwesome49FX]] ([[User talk:ItAwesome49FX#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ItAwesome49FX|contribs]]) </small>
::::::::{{U|ItAwesome49FX}} Right here. Please note that this page is not a webhost. Thanks. :) [[User:Thegooduser|<span style="color: teal">'''Thegooduser'''</span>]] [[User talk:Thegooduser|<span style="color: maroon">Let's Chat</span>]] <span style="color:red">🍁</span> 21:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
::::::::{{U|ItAwesome49FX}} Right here. Please note that this page is not a webhost. Thanks. :) [[User:Thegooduser|<span style="color: teal">'''Thegooduser'''</span>]] [[User talk:Thegooduser|<span style="color: maroon">Let's Chat</span>]] <span style="color:red">🍁</span> 21:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

== Cassiopeia sent me 3 articles to the Draft section, without wanting to notice their context. ==

Hi there.

I've been creating and editing tennis articles for more than 4 years. More specifically, articles about certain draws of their tournaments. For most of the time, I had no problems with the Wikipedia staff since this type of articles doesn't require much detail; you only need the official source of that tournament draw, which can be found at one of the three official websites (ATP, WTA of ITF) and nothing else. Those pages are already linked to their main page, which is about the tournament itself. At that time, everyone unserstood that idea, specially inside the Tennis community, and again, I had no problems until now.

On 22 October 2018, after I created the article [[Draft:1995 US Open – Men's Doubles Qualifying]] (already linked to two main articles: [[1995 US Open (tennis)]] and [[1995 US Open – Men's Doubles]]), I received a notification which says that the user Cassiopeia sent me the article to the Draft section and won't be published, for allegedly not meeting the requirements to qualify as a Wikipedia article. I responded him/her with the same arguments as I wrote to you right now: since there was only 1 available source (the ITF website), I could occupy that source in order to make the article. However, Cassiopeia sent me another mesaage in which he/she refuses to read my arguments and kept the article in the Draft section, until "I find another 'neutral' source".

And today, 12 November 2018, I've just logged in and realize that the very same Cassiopeia sent me another two articles to the draft section: [[Draft:1979 US Open – Mixed Doubles]] and [[Draft:1993 Bank of the West Classic – Singles]], despite I clearly typed the phrase ''"Draws will be completed in the following days"'' at the edit section. Again, not asking for details, not asking for a context, he/she just sent me those articles to the Draft section an that's it.

Currently, I'm very upset because I had no chance to appeal to those three articles ''before'' being sent to the Draft version. That's why I responded to Cassiopeia, apart from the rant itself, with the phrase "Shoot first, ask questions later", because I really feel that he/she acted that way. You can watch articles for current tournaments (such as [[2018 ATP Finals – Singles]]) to realize that this is the way that tennis articles are currently made, and that's because you only need a coulpe of official sources to update scores and results. Nothing else. Those three articles don't deserve to be on the Draft section, so I'm asking you, if possible, to approve this appeal and sent them back to the Published status.

Greetings.
[[User:Pablito064|Pablito064]] ([[User talk:Pablito064|talk]]) 23:18, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:18, 12 November 2018

Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Template:Archive box collapsible


Thegooduser's talk page guidelines

When leaving me a message or others, it must be respectful, not a rude message. Thank You. Remember to sign your message(s) using four tildes (~~~~).

If your message contains sensitive info, please email me:Email me here (You will need an account to email me)

Please display my awards in my user page, under the section "Thegooduser's hall of fame" (On the Bottom of my userpage.)

If you had a hard time seeing my signature, please let me know, Thanks!

For all urgent messages please click Here



Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Thegooduser! You created a thread called Copyvio at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Thegooduser! You created a thread called Talk Page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


TheWikiWizard

I would like to join WikiWizard as an editor, maybe I’ll be able to change up the schedule a bit. PorkchopGMX (Sign your posts with four tildes!) 03:25, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PorkchopGMX Hi there! Thanks for wanting to Join. Yes, You can join. What would you like to do? (Ex. What position do you want?) Thanks for Joining. I will add you to the list! Then We can start this months issue together! Thanks for Joining! Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 03:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I might do Assistant Editor, sometimes I’ll write the articles so we can switch to a better schedule. Also I might fix the formatting and whatnot. PorkchopGMX (Sign your posts with four tildes!) 03:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
PorkchopGMX Sounds Good! I have added you to the list. Thanks for Joining! Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 03:42, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard articlea

I'm not really sure what the article in TWW is, can you please tell me (is it like Wikipedia:TheWikiWizard/Be bold!)? PorkchopGMX (Sign your posts with four tildes!) 18:25, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PorkchopGMX It's a Code of Conduct. :) --Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 20:36, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:PorkchopGMX I see now. A article on TWW can be anything from advice to new features, or events happening around the EN Wiki. Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 20:41, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So I guess Wikipedia:TheWikiWizard/Be bold! falls under advice, so it’s an article? PorkchopGMX (Sign your posts with four tildes!) 20:43, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
PorkchopGMX Yep. I added it back. Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 20:44, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Also, do you like the banner at the top of TWW pages I made (Wikipedia: TheWikiWizard/banner? PorkchopGMX (Sign your posts with four tildes!) 20:46, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@PorkchopGMX: Yea, it's a really cool banner. I love it! Great job! Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 20:49, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Thegooduser: On the October 2018 issue, it says that you should leave a message on this user talk page while the TheWikiWizard page said that you should do it on theWikiWizard’s talk page. You should make Wikipedia talk:TheWikiWizard the place where you should request it, also put it in your watchlist. Also new shortcut to TheWikiWizard: WP:TWW. PorkchopGMX (Sign your posts with four tildes!) 21:53, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Thegooduser! You created a thread called User:Thegooduser/Nightpedia.js at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


No Subject

Hi! I was doing a project on Saudi Arabia, and noticed that the political party page in Saudi Arabia said there were none, and national elections were banned! I determined this was false, by the source our teacher had given us; CultrGrams. They do have national elections, and I'm sure they have political parties as well(as they are detailed below, on the page)! I didnt notice I could add comments though, so this is why I didnt add them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.34.227.250 (talk) 03:21, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UserPage

Hello, I am new to Wikipedia and I was wonder If you could make a custom wiki page for me just like you did on your user page because I new to Wikipedia soya. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ItAwesome49FX (talkcontribs) 21:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ItAwesome49FX, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please read This page on how to make your userpage and I will glad to help you after if you have any questions. Thanks, Happy Editing! :-)--Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 21:32, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What? ItAwesome49FX (talk) 21:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a Webhost. Don't worry, You're not in any trouble. :) Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 21:37, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As long as you read the notice I left you on your talk page, and the page I gave to you above, You're fine. :) Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 21:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Where do I talk to you than? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ItAwesome49FX (talkcontribs)
ItAwesome49FX Right here. Please note that this page is not a webhost. Thanks. :) Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 21:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cassiopeia sent me 3 articles to the Draft section, without wanting to notice their context.

Hi there.

I've been creating and editing tennis articles for more than 4 years. More specifically, articles about certain draws of their tournaments. For most of the time, I had no problems with the Wikipedia staff since this type of articles doesn't require much detail; you only need the official source of that tournament draw, which can be found at one of the three official websites (ATP, WTA of ITF) and nothing else. Those pages are already linked to their main page, which is about the tournament itself. At that time, everyone unserstood that idea, specially inside the Tennis community, and again, I had no problems until now.

On 22 October 2018, after I created the article Draft:1995 US Open – Men's Doubles Qualifying (already linked to two main articles: 1995 US Open (tennis) and 1995 US Open – Men's Doubles), I received a notification which says that the user Cassiopeia sent me the article to the Draft section and won't be published, for allegedly not meeting the requirements to qualify as a Wikipedia article. I responded him/her with the same arguments as I wrote to you right now: since there was only 1 available source (the ITF website), I could occupy that source in order to make the article. However, Cassiopeia sent me another mesaage in which he/she refuses to read my arguments and kept the article in the Draft section, until "I find another 'neutral' source".

And today, 12 November 2018, I've just logged in and realize that the very same Cassiopeia sent me another two articles to the draft section: Draft:1979 US Open – Mixed Doubles and Draft:1993 Bank of the West Classic – Singles, despite I clearly typed the phrase "Draws will be completed in the following days" at the edit section. Again, not asking for details, not asking for a context, he/she just sent me those articles to the Draft section an that's it.

Currently, I'm very upset because I had no chance to appeal to those three articles before being sent to the Draft version. That's why I responded to Cassiopeia, apart from the rant itself, with the phrase "Shoot first, ask questions later", because I really feel that he/she acted that way. You can watch articles for current tournaments (such as 2018 ATP Finals – Singles) to realize that this is the way that tennis articles are currently made, and that's because you only need a coulpe of official sources to update scores and results. Nothing else. Those three articles don't deserve to be on the Draft section, so I'm asking you, if possible, to approve this appeal and sent them back to the Published status.

Greetings. Pablito064 (talk) 23:18, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]