Jump to content

Talk:Varman dynasty: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


{{u|Qwertywander1}}, {{u|Qwertywander}}, {{u|Chaipau}}, {{u|Bhaskarbhagawati}}: From what I can tell, much of the content being questioned has been in the article since 2013. Qwertywander (who, I'm assuming, is the same as Qwertywander1) removed a large chunk of it without explanation in April and there's been a slow edit war going on since. I've reverted the page to a relatively stable version. Please discuss this issue here and gain consensus before modifying this section further. For starters, what is the problem with the section at the moment? (My opinion is that there needs to be a clear delineation between traditional sources and historical ones. I also think that some of the sources are dated and should be replaced/avoided.)—[[User:Cpt.a.haddock|Cpt.a.haddock]] ([[User talk:Cpt.a.haddock|talk]]) <small>(please <u>ping</u> when replying)</small> 19:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
{{u|Qwertywander1}}, {{u|Qwertywander}}, {{u|Chaipau}}, {{u|Bhaskarbhagawati}}: From what I can tell, much of the content being questioned has been in the article since 2013. Qwertywander (who, I'm assuming, is the same as Qwertywander1) removed a large chunk of it without explanation in April and there's been a slow edit war going on since. I've reverted the page to a relatively stable version. Please discuss this issue here and gain consensus before modifying this section further. For starters, what is the problem with the section at the moment? (My opinion is that there needs to be a clear delineation between traditional sources and historical ones. I also think that some of the sources are dated and should be replaced/avoided.)—[[User:Cpt.a.haddock|Cpt.a.haddock]] ([[User talk:Cpt.a.haddock|talk]]) <small>(please <u>ping</u> when replying)</small> 19:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

== So called Aryan of Assam must know ==
Kirata-Kachari Khasi Garo Miri Yuvana Kangka Gowal Asom Muluka Dhova Je Turuka Kuvaca Mlecha Chandal ( Shankardev Sloka)

Kirata = Shaivite Bodo or Umbrella Mongoloid |

Kachari = Kacha + Ari = Tantric religion , Kechai Khaiti Worshipers |

Kuvaca = Koch

Mlecha = Mech = Bathou worshipers Bodo . Non-vedic religion , Mostly warriors hence litle bit Brabarian .

Self claimed High caste Aryan of Assam are descendants of Fisherman , Wassherman , Weaver , Doom , Chandals etc = Job seeker .
There is high propaganda to show Kamrup Kingdom as Aryan kingdom .

But relax , Try to find meaning of Bara-Fisa , Ram-sa , Basumati-Ari , Barah-Ari , Bara Hari .

Do you know your nick names - Kula by Ahom . Harsa by Bodos . Harsa = Hari-Fisa = Community-Child / Community-Small, Here , Small community( Harsa) is your name because you were descendants of Dhovi Tati Chamar Chandal Kangka Gowal etc

Stop your propaganda [[User:PerfectingNEI|PerfectingNEI]] ([[User talk:PerfectingNEI|talk]]) 22:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

== Bhaskarbhagawati Propaganda ==
{{Ping|Bhaskarbhagawati}} You have given distorted not a hinduised Koch into not a hinduised non-Aryan. Why ? [[User:PerfectingNEI|PerfectingNEI]] ([[User talk:PerfectingNEI|talk]]) 22:42, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

== Propagandist Aryan of Assam ==
Datta means given . Dutta is bangali title . Started during British regime . You can imagine your origin from Dattatrey ;-) [[User:PerfectingNEI|PerfectingNEI]] ([[User talk:PerfectingNEI|talk]]) 22:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

== Fylindfotberserk Revert ==
{{Ping|Fylindfotberserk}} Where is it written that 18-19th century Race can't be written ? And North East never part of Aryavart. Where is it written that there is only Aryan and Non-Aryan Race ? You have reverted sourced content . Show me where is it written 18th - 19th century race name can't be written. Stop your propaganda . [[User:PerfectingNEI|PerfectingNEI]] ([[User talk:PerfectingNEI|talk]]) 10:31, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:31, 10 June 2019

WikiProject iconBiography: Royalty and Nobility Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconIndia: Assam / History Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Assam (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Ethnic origins

Qwertywander1, Qwertywander, Chaipau, Bhaskarbhagawati: From what I can tell, much of the content being questioned has been in the article since 2013. Qwertywander (who, I'm assuming, is the same as Qwertywander1) removed a large chunk of it without explanation in April and there's been a slow edit war going on since. I've reverted the page to a relatively stable version. Please discuss this issue here and gain consensus before modifying this section further. For starters, what is the problem with the section at the moment? (My opinion is that there needs to be a clear delineation between traditional sources and historical ones. I also think that some of the sources are dated and should be replaced/avoided.)—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 19:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So called Aryan of Assam must know

Kirata-Kachari Khasi Garo Miri Yuvana Kangka Gowal Asom Muluka Dhova Je Turuka Kuvaca Mlecha Chandal ( Shankardev Sloka)

Kirata = Shaivite Bodo or Umbrella Mongoloid |

Kachari = Kacha + Ari = Tantric religion , Kechai Khaiti Worshipers |

Kuvaca = Koch

Mlecha = Mech = Bathou worshipers Bodo . Non-vedic religion , Mostly warriors hence litle bit Brabarian .

Self claimed High caste Aryan of Assam are descendants of Fisherman , Wassherman , Weaver , Doom , Chandals etc = Job seeker . There is high propaganda to show Kamrup Kingdom as Aryan kingdom .

But relax , Try to find meaning of Bara-Fisa , Ram-sa , Basumati-Ari , Barah-Ari , Bara Hari .

Do you know your nick names - Kula by Ahom . Harsa by Bodos . Harsa = Hari-Fisa = Community-Child / Community-Small, Here , Small community( Harsa) is your name because you were descendants of Dhovi Tati Chamar Chandal Kangka Gowal etc

Stop your propaganda PerfectingNEI (talk) 22:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bhaskarbhagawati Propaganda

@Bhaskarbhagawati: You have given distorted not a hinduised Koch into not a hinduised non-Aryan. Why ? PerfectingNEI (talk) 22:42, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propagandist Aryan of Assam

Datta means given . Dutta is bangali title . Started during British regime . You can imagine your origin from Dattatrey ;-) PerfectingNEI (talk) 22:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fylindfotberserk Revert

@Fylindfotberserk: Where is it written that 18-19th century Race can't be written ? And North East never part of Aryavart. Where is it written that there is only Aryan and Non-Aryan Race ? You have reverted sourced content . Show me where is it written 18th - 19th century race name can't be written. Stop your propaganda . PerfectingNEI (talk) 10:31, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]