Jump to content

User talk:Cahk: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎October 2019: Item 2: Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s) to stop their disruptive behavior.
→‎A barnstar for you!: are you stalking me? sheesh.
Line 47: Line 47:
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for your diligence in dealing with spambots. [[User:Praxidicae|Praxidicae]] ([[User talk:Praxidicae|talk]]) 11:46, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for your diligence in dealing with spambots. [[User:Praxidicae|Praxidicae]] ([[User talk:Praxidicae|talk]]) 11:46, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
|}
|}
:Ye gods, Prax, are you stalking me? [[User:KillerChihuahua|Killer]][[User talk:KillerChihuahua|<span style="color: #415651;">Chihuahua</span>]] 12:00, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:00, 4 October 2019

Prince Musa'ad bin Khalid Al Saud wikipedia page

Hi Cahk,

Based on latest recommendations, the lead page is added. Also, some new reference is added there. Please have a look and let me know if anything more to be done to make this wiki-page fully effective.

~Rishi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishi.kh (talkcontribs) 11:10, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rishi.kh: Another editor has already reviewed it in the mean time.--Cahk (talk) 10:33, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Information icon Thank you for making a report about ClarissaWeeks62 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, the user was not warned. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. KillerChihuahua 12:54, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KillerChihuahua: Those are spambot accounts. I report at least 3-4 accounts a day on such spam account. You can see my edit history to confirm the same.--Cahk (talk) 12:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah that's fine, except we actually have policies about this shit. There are admins who happily ignore those polices; I am not one of them. KillerChihuahua 12:57, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@KillerChihuahua: AIV states "Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s) to stop their disruptive behavior." A spam farm with 7 accounts in the span of a few hours should constitute as egregious case. The AIV guide states "What constitutes "enough" is left to your best judgment". I would also point out this has been discussed on previous occasions on [1] and [2] --Cahk (talk) 13:03, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's a basic spambot. If you don't recognize that, you're not qualified to be reviewing the reports. Vermont (talk) 15:55, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you intend to malign me, we're not going to get very far. Policy, which was written by a great many people, states clearly on item 2 "Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s) to stop their disruptive behavior." If you can't follow the rules, you're not qualified to be reporting anyone, to toss your rather hostile words back at you. Slap a warning on the dang userpage before you report. KillerChihuahua 11:59, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The No Spam Barnstar
Thank you for your diligence in dealing with spambots. Praxidicae (talk) 11:46, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ye gods, Prax, are you stalking me? KillerChihuahua 12:00, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]