User talk:Peacemaker67

G'day. If you have got something to say, pull up a pew and say it (but please be civil).

Informal portrait of the editor as a young man

Next step?

On the talk page I exposed that all presented information are accurate and written in books by historians, deleting that facts is because someone does not like it, I'm here alone and I'm interested in what to do? Thanks. Mikola22 (talk) 08:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

What you do now is you discuss the edits on the talk page and a consensus is developed about their inclusion (or not). That is how Wikipedia works. Be prepared to explain why you think these sources are reliable per WP:RS. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

How they not reliable when most has original historical documents as a source. The rest was written by historians and there is no reason for them to have lied, that lie can be easily disputed. I am curious how come that Sokollu Mehmed Pasha is referred in the Wikipedia as a Serbian when we don’t have any historical source data which prove that. Original historical information mentioned by American historian is that he is captured in Croatia (today part of eastern Bosnia) otherwise in that area other historical sources mention Croats, Serbs are extremely rare in historical documents (I'm talking about the historical records which mention local population). And when I bring information that Sokollu Mehmed Pasha coming from Croatia it is not relevant information? Which are these reliable sources which prove that Sokollu Mehmed Pasha is Serbian origin when we don't have any historical data which prove that, but we have information that it comes from Croatia. Something is wrong here, as I said this is an ideal platform for mitomania, unfortunately, but I'll try to fight with the truth. Mikola22 (talk) 09:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

You need to have this discussion on the talk page of the article, not here. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 21:57, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

There is no one on talk page, because there is no concrete evidence that Sokollu Mehmed Pasha is Serbian origin. And what we have from talk page when that information(Serbian origin) still exists in the Wikipedia article. Go to some forum and prove that Sokollu Mehmed Pasha is Serbian origin, you won't be able to prove it. But this information still stands on Wikipedia read by ordinary people's, students, etc. but it is a lie. That's why i asked is Wikipedia a private portal? I don't know what's going on here? Mikola22 (talk) 09:31, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

		Cookies!
		Sun Creator has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thank you for the edit on Arthur Blackburn. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 13:43, 8 November 2019 (UTC) To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Delicious! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Cold War, again

hey. I'm really sorry to bother you, but Cold War was finally delisted from GA and so needs a MILHIST A-review. I promise I would do it myself, but last time I bollixed it all up. Ummm. May I ask... would you please do the honors of starting it? I am sorry to throw it off on you. I will !vote delist after it is started. Tks ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 07:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

No worries, it is pretty proforma, tbh. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Done. The redirect from the old review page had to be deleted to make way for a new one. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Willbb234 on Allied pilots, Hawkeye7 on the defence of Australia and logistics in Indochina, Nick-D on Australian commandos Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports back on a high-profile history symposium

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		The Military history A-Class medal with diamonds
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class medal with Diamonds for Arthur Blackburn, Yugoslav destroyer Ljubljana, and 1st Army Group (Kingdom of Yugoslavia). Gog the Mild (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 14 November 2019 (UTC)