Jump to content

User talk:WinstonSmith01984: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 39: Line 39:
::No it is not, This is now a warning. Do not call content disputes vandalism.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 15:09, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
::No it is not, This is now a warning. Do not call content disputes vandalism.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 15:09, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
::Misusing the term vandalism is [[WP:ASPERSIONS|casting aspersions]]. Don't use the word unless an edit is malicious in nature. [[User:Objective3000|O3000]] ([[User talk:Objective3000|talk]]) 15:11, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
::Misusing the term vandalism is [[WP:ASPERSIONS|casting aspersions]]. Don't use the word unless an edit is malicious in nature. [[User:Objective3000|O3000]] ([[User talk:Objective3000|talk]]) 15:11, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

You also need to read [[wp:brd]], [[wp:revert]] and [[wp:editwar]]. Once someone reverts you you are not supposed to revert them until you have consensus.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 15:15, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:15, 14 March 2020

Welcome!

A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, WinstonSmith01984, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Talk:Media coverage of Bernie Sanders. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 16:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC) Sm8900 (talk) 16:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

O3000 (talk) 15:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Template:Z33[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

O3000 (talk) 15:02, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Template:Z33[reply]

Note once you have been undone (reverted) it is down to you to make a case at talk page, not to edit war.Slatersteven (talk) 15:03, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also I suggest you read wp:vandal. What was done was not vandalism, and making unfounded accusation is against the rules.Slatersteven (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

removing referenced content and providing no explanation is vandalism per the WP definition. WinstonSmith01984 (talk) 15:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No it is not, This is now a warning. Do not call content disputes vandalism.Slatersteven (talk) 15:09, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Misusing the term vandalism is casting aspersions. Don't use the word unless an edit is malicious in nature. O3000 (talk) 15:11, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to read wp:brd, wp:revert and wp:editwar. Once someone reverts you you are not supposed to revert them until you have consensus.Slatersteven (talk) 15:15, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]