Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kung-Flu: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 06:57, 31 March 2020

Kung-Flu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion of racism, xenophobia and stereotype PenulisHantu (talk) 02:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree. This term has been around for what, like a week? Leave this junk for Urban Dictionary. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Seconded the deletion. this is Wikipedia, not Urban Dictionary. Pahiy (talk) 02:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Garbage, has april fools come early? completely useless and borderline racist. Thirded deletion Homeofthething (talk) 03:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G3 Speedy Delete and salt into oblivion I don't usually like doing this in a nom vote!, but to @L293D: (who approved the AfC) and @Utopes: (reviewed); this racist garbage should have never been approved to be created or reviewed as A-OK, or left unprotected. 67.70.32.186 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)'s contrib history itself could do with a nice fine-tooth combing (SARS mask stands out right away, for instance).Nate • (chatter) 05:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a relatively mainstream term among right-wing pundits. Indeed white house staffers are known to use this term to describe COVID-19. You can call it racist, but that is not an argument. Would you also call for the deletion of the article "nigger", by that logic? Since, this is a non-standard terminology, it seems natural that we should re-direct this to the actual article. It's not an endorsement on the term, but merely a recognition of its existence. CompactSpacez (talk) 06:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disambiguations|list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 05:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)</small>
 *'''G3 Speedy Delete and salt into oblivion''' I don't usually like doing this in a nom vote!, but to {{ping|L293D}} (who approved the AfC) and {{ping|Utopes}} (reviewed); this racist garbage should have never been approved to be created or reviewed as A-OK, '''or''' left unprotected. {{ip|67.70.32.186}}'s contrib history itself could do with a nice fine-tooth combing ([[SARS mask]] stands out right away, for instance).<span style="font-family: Roboto;">'''[[User:Mrschimpf|<span style="color:royalblue4">Nate</span>]]''' <span style="color:#00008B">•</span> <small>''([[User_talk:Mrschimpf|<span style="color:#B8860B">chatter</span>]])''</small></span> 05:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' This is a relatively mainstream term among right-wing pundits. Indeed white house staffers are known to use this term to describe COVID-19. You can call it racist, but that is not an argument. Would you also call for the deletion of the article "nigger", by that logic? Since, this is a non-standard terminology, it seems natural that we should re-direct this to the actual article. It's not an endorsement on the term, but merely a recognition of its existence. [[User:CompactSpacez|CompactSpacez]] ([[User talk:CompactSpacez|talk]]) 06:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)