Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Eiffel Tower (2009 FP): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:53, 24 August 2020

Delist and Replace: Eiffel Tower (2009 FP)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2020 at 23:49:10 (UTC)

Reason: The cropped version is the one actually used in the main article, and has been stable there since 2016.
Articles this image appears in: Current FP is still in Landmark, Landmarks in Paris, Lattice tower, List of cultural icons of France, List of nonbuilding structure types, Structural art and Structural engineering; suggested replacement is in Eiffel Tower, Arch and List of most visited palaces and monuments
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Eiffel Tower
Nominator: Paul_012 (talk)

~~Delist & replace~~ — Paul_012 (talk) 23:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Rather over-cropped if you ask me. Maye try a compromise? Leave the top as in uncropped, crop the bottom somewhere between? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 09:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Something like Alt1 below? --Paul_012 (talk) 09:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alt1 – half as cropped (CSS image crop)

I agree regarding the over-crop. I prefer the original. It was probably cropped just for infobox use. Bammesk (talk) 03:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree that the current FP is aesthetically better, but the aspect ratio really doesn't work well for infobox use (even the cropped version still overwhelms the vertical space). Are we okay with not having the FP be used in the main article, where it has the most EV? --Paul_012 (talk) 09:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Trivially restored to the page using {{CSS image crop}}. Which I did. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.4% of all FPs} 12:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah, never thought of that as an option. Withdrawing nomination. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Adam. MER-C 17:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ;Nominator: [[User:Paul 012|Paul_012]] ([[User talk:Paul 012|talk]])
-* '''Delist & replace''' &mdash; [[User:Paul 012|Paul_012]] ([[User talk:Paul 012|talk]]) 23:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
+* <s>'''Delist & replace'''</s> &mdash; [[User:Paul 012|Paul_012]] ([[User talk:Paul 012|talk]]) 23:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Rather over-cropped if you ask me. Maye try a compromise? Leave the top as in uncropped, crop the bottom somewhere between? <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">'''[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup><sub>Has about 7.4% of all [[WP:FP|FPs]]</sub></span> 09:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
 **Something like Alt1 below? --[[User:Paul 012|Paul_012]] ([[User talk:Paul 012|talk]]) 09:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 **I agree that the current FP is aesthetically better, but the aspect ratio really doesn't work well for infobox use (even the cropped version still overwhelms the vertical space). Are we okay with not having the FP be used in the main article, where it has the most EV? --[[User:Paul 012|Paul_012]] ([[User talk:Paul 012|talk]]) 09:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 **'''Keep'''. Trivially restored to the page using {{tl|CSS image crop}}. Which I did. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">'''[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup><sub>Has about 7.4% of all [[WP:FP|FPs]]</sub></span> 12:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
+***Ah, never thought of that as an option. '''Withdraw'''ing nomination. --[[User:Paul 012|Paul_012]] ([[User talk:Paul 012|talk]]) 17:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' per Adam. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 17:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 <!-- additional votes go above this line  -->