Jump to content

User talk:Rashicy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rashicy (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 101: Line 101:


::Why do you call it the Liban Sultanate, if you admit there is no such thing? —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 03:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
::Why do you call it the Liban Sultanate, if you admit there is no such thing? —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 03:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I call it the Liban sultanate because the majority of the people at the time in the area were muslims and a Muslim civilisation is generally referred to a sultanate {reply to|C.Fred}} [[User:Rashicy|Rashicy]] ([[User talk:Rashicy#top|talk]]) 03:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Liban Sultanate]] ==
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Liban Sultanate]] ==

Revision as of 03:06, 18 April 2021

Rashicy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Rashicy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 4 April 2021 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Mora Kingdom has been accepted

Mora Kingdom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noah 💬 19:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much Noah Rashicy (talk) 21:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Language changes

Rashicy, you have made several recent edits to articles which have changed correct grammar or wording to incorrect or unidiomatic English, for instance [1], [2], [3], [4]. Even if such edits are made in good faith, they unfortunately create more work for other editors who have to fix the errors. Since the drafts you have created contain a lot of language errors (Draft:Mora Kingdom should not have been accepted in this condition, not only because the references are not correctly written so they are impossible to verify, but also because it contains multiple language errors and unidiomatic language), it looks like your written English is not at a level where you should be changing grammar or wording of Wikipedia articles.

Having an imperfect command of English is no big deal, it just means that you need to recognise the fact that there are things you should avoid doing in Wikipedia. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 06:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bondea thanks for the message, all the edits I have contributed make sense to me and I can assure you that English is my first language and I know what I’m doing. Mira has been reviewed by 3 admins and two of them thought it met wikipedian standards. Please stop reverting my edits and claiming I don’t know English. Please move my article from the draft space because it makes clear sense it has a descent amount of sourcers and is written in pure English. As for the other articles I edited I was just trying to help, cheers: Rashicy (talk) 08:46, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm Lomrjyo. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tadjoura without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Lomrjyo (talk) 00:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The info was unsourced @Lomrjyo: Rashicy (talk) 00:43, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, removing content Lomrjyo (talk) 00:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the content because it was original research Rashicy (talk) 00:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise known as original info Rashicy (talk) 00:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you were taking a wiki break your user page says you go to school @C.Fred: Rashicy (talk) 03:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Liban Sultanate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to verify content, search does not get any reliable hits. At best, original research or a novel name for an area. At worst, as another editor suggests, may be a blatant hoax.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 01:18, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]