User talk:Miacek: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:49, 11 December 2009

This user has a zero tolerance policy towards trolls on Wikipedia.

I have over 1,000 pages on my watchlist. I don't have enough time to address all the problems I may spot on Wikipedia. For my own reference, below I'm listing various active and constructive contributors. (Don't be offended if I forgot you! I only quickly skimmed my talk page and watchlist to refresh my memory in drafting this list.)

Lia Looveer

As far as I happen to know, organizing cultural festivals doesn't count as political activity in Australia. Neither does being an immigrant politician count as being a politician in the country of origin. If Looveer had a particular Estonian political role, you've evidently forgotten to make any mention it. Anti-Nationalist (talk) 22:08, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have now simply ignored the question, I'm going to change the categorization back to just Australian politicians. Although Looveer was Estonian-born, just what role (if any) she had in Estonian politics was never clarified by either you, the Wiki article, or her biographers. Being born in country X does not necessarily make on an X-ian politician, but I'd be happy if you'd like to fill me in about this at Talk:Lia Looveer (if you'd still like to carry forward with the same argument). Anti-Nationalist (talk) 00:35, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've had little wikitime throughout the last week, will try to answer once I've checked a few WP policy pages. And how did you reach the page I once created, that you had never edited before? I assume not by stalking. --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 12:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Freud had this great psychological theory called projection. Ever heard of it?

Great job insinuating that I'm stalking by performing a gnomish edit at a second article you made after stumbling upon your BLP violation at Roy Medvedev [1]. Anti-Nationalist (talk) 19:24, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Curiously enough, the supposed BLP violation arose due to my translation from Russian Wikipedia: Ныне встал на позиции «красного путинизма». This statement on ru.wiki was sourced, on the other hand, your edit summary was a specimen of assuming bad faith and slandering and I will report it. --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 14:06, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've neglected that this is how an opponent characterizes Medvedev's position, not Medvedev himself. Instead you left the spurious notion of "Red Putinism" attributed to Medvedev's views in the article, completely unsourced. Wikipedia makes it pretty clear that opinions are not to be presented as fact, must be attributed. Anti-Nationalist (talk) 18:12, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Martial law and Siwak

Re: martial law - thanks for translating. We should, if possible, move it to either wikiquote or wikisource (I am a bit surprised the text is not on pl wikisource yet...). Re: Siwak - you should ask at WP:POLAND. I'll add him to my to do list, but I am afraid it may have to wait - a year (reason, place to discuss it).--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure whether it's ok to copy it into Commons. It likely has some copyright issues, for example, when I asked @ ru.wiki on similar documents from the USSR of 1980s and 1990/1991, I was advised that theoretically the texts are copyrighted. --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 10:40, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion

Please note that I have nominated the article Lia Looveer for deletion. The Four Deuces (talk) 05:54, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lia Looveer

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lia Looveer. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lia Looveer. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Conservative-Monarchist Club

The article Conservative-Monarchist Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shadowjams (talk) 12:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for answering my question. No thanks, I am not going to debate anything serious by email with you or any other member of the list. This is for obvious reason: I do not really know who submitted this archive to Arbcome to damage seventeen editors; it may or may not be someone from the list. Speaking Russian, I do not even know if that was vertukhai or nasedka.Biophys (talk) 23:49, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 82: / Line 82: @@
 Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised.  Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed Deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist.  The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy Deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Shadowjams|Shadowjams]] ([[User talk:Shadowjams|talk]]) 12:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
+==Thank you==
+Thank you for answering my question. No thanks, I am not going to debate anything serious by email with you or any other member of the list. This is for obvious reason: I do not really know who submitted this archive to Arbcome to damage seventeen editors; it may or may not be someone from the list. Speaking Russian, I do not even know if that was vertukhai or nasedka.[[User:Biophys|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Biophys|talk]]) 23:49, 11 December 2009 (UTC)