I understand you think it's disputed, but please allow other users to share their input on the talk page before adding the template. --[[User:Pilotguy|Winter]] 23:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
I understand you think it's disputed, but please allow other users to share their input on the talk page before adding the template. --[[User:Pilotguy|Winter]] 23:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia under the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that nobody may [[Wikipedia:revert|revert]] an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the ''effect'' of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.<!-- {{3RR}} --> [[User:Jkelly|Jkelly]] 23:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
This message is regarding the page Leonardo da Vinci. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. -- xaosfluxT/C03:36, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be more inclined to believe in your edits if you didn't already have a habit of vandalizing other physics/science related articles [1], and since I can't possibly confirm your comment about Hawking, I'm going to revert you instead--Aolanonawanabe03:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. bogdan22:45, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I fail to see how Anon has vandalized the Einstein page in his most recent edit (re: Poincare). Perhaps a good and honest conversation on the talk page of the Einstein article will give the relevant editors there a chance to turn over "new leafs" of their own. Lucidish01:25, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for half a fortnight in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated addition of contested information without discussion despite warnings. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to do so after the block expires. // Pathoschild04:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your block has been reduced to 24 hours from the time of this message at the request of another user. Repeatedly adding contested facts despite opposition from other editors is considered bad faith. Please discuss controversial changes on the article's talk page. // Pathoschild07:15, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Before resuming editing, please familiarize yourself with the following Wikipedia policies. Knowledge of them will prevent your being blocked in the future and perhaps make you understand the terms in which people are discussing things.
Also, please read the pages I posted up above before editing again, or else you will just find yourself blocked once again after a very short amount of time, with little to show for it. There are plenty of legitimate ways to propose content changes and to register your disagreement with particular statements in articles; you have not been engaged in any of them. --Fastfission22:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I understand you think it's disputed, but please allow other users to share their input on the talk page before adding the template. --Winter23:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Jkelly23:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
