User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA3

Welcome!

Archives and sandboxes My articles Awards received Dreadstar's Archives Dreadstar's Sandboxes In recognition of your efforts on Wikipedia and for dedication to law oriented edits, I, Cdogsimmons, award you the Society Barnstar. Defender The Mighty Defender of the Wiki Barnstar In recognition & thanks for your efforts in helping us work our way towards consensus towards making Battle of Washita River a good WP:NPOV (instead of WP:SOAP) article. Still a lotta work to do, but now we can do it, in no small part because of your help. Yksin Award! The Vandal Eliminator Award * I, Stormtracker94, award you the Vandal Eliminator Award for amazing vandal fighting and RC Patrol. STORMTRACKER 94 Go Irish! RL Barnstar The Real Life Barnstar - For reporting a situation that could have resulted in a real life massacre I present you this barnstar. Initiative in dealing with situations like this is essential, and for all we know you may have saved lives the moment you posted that. Good work! Thank you. +Hexagon1 (t) Initiative in dealing with situations like this is essential, and for all we know you may have saved lives the moment you posted that. Good work! +Hexagon1 (t) Just be glad you're on the good side, every time I get involved in situations like that, I seem to be the one getting arrested... (kidding, please don't report me Mr. Thoughtpolice-man! :) +Hexagon1 Holy wow. Good job, Dreadstar. --Fang Aili talk

New comments below this section

Thanks! Dreadstar †

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		Whereas, Dreadstar has shown himself to be a member of the community distinguished for his devotion to the Wikipedia project; Therefore be it resolved, that this Barnstar of Integrity is affixed to his wall.   Will Beback  talk  11:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Wow, thanks Will, this really means a lot! Dreadstar ☥ 03:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Unblock

Hi, I generally support Ludwigs' view and have also disagreed with QG. Just wanted to make sure you saw that although Ludwigs used a regular unblock template, that the initial block was done under ArbCom sanctions, and carried this: "Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee.". I'd like to see the block lifted as well, but not if it means you put yourself into the mess. Ocaasi (talk) 03:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

It was a very bad block and in my opinion did not properly fall under the ArbCom findings. If this goes to ArbCom, and I'm sanctined for it, so be it. Dreadstar ☥ 03:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

It was certainly a debatable block at least, but since it was done under ArbCom, you might be prepared for some backlash. Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks#Arbitration_enforcement_blocks versus Wikipedia:Block#Unblocking may be helpful. Ocaasi (talk) 03:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the support, I was prepared for backlash when I did it. It would have nice, acutally, for the issue to have acutally been brought to WP:AE, it wasn't. Dreadstar ☥ 03:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)