Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:02, 4 June 2006

This page documents an English Wikipedia naming conventions.

Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page.

Shortcut

[[:|WP:NC(CN)]]

This page in a nutshell: Except where other established naming conventions give a different indication, use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things

Convention: Use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things. The principal exception is in the case of naming royalty and people with titles. For details of the naming conventions in those cases, see the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles) page. This is however not the only exception, see "Exceptions" section below.

General principle

When choosing a name for a page ask yourself: What word would the average user of the Wikipedia put into the search engine?

Wikipedia is not a place to advocate a title change in order to reflect recent scholarship. The articles themselves reflect recent scholarship but the titles should represent common usage.

Titles should be as simple as possible without being too general.

For example, the page about jazz should simply be called "Jazz", not "Jazz music", because "jazz" refers in almost any context to a genre of music, and the simpler title makes linking easier. Adding the word "music" is redundant.

On the other hand, Country music should be on a page called Country music because the word "country" has other referents besides the musical genre. If we ignore potential ambiguity, the ideal of simplicity can be at odds with the ideal of precision.

Rationale

Names of articles should be the most commonly used name for the following reasons:

We want to maximize the likelihood of being listed in external search engines, thereby attracting more people to Wikipedia. For example, the pagename is Jimmy Carter and not "James Earl Carter, Jr."; the string "Jimmy Carter" in the page title make it easier to find: search engines will often give greater weight to the contents of the title than to the body of the page. Since "Jimmy Carter" is the most common form of the name, it will be searched on more often, and having that exact string in our page title will often mean our page shows up higher in other search engines.
We want to maximize the incidence that people who make a link guessing the article name, guess correctly; people guessing a different name may think there is no article yet, which may cause duplication.
Using a full formal name requires people to know that name, and to type more.

Redirects help, but give a slightly ugly "redirected from" announcement at the top of the page. On the other hand, if someone reads or hears "King Billy", and wonders who might be meant by that, the "redirected from King Billy" at the top of the page describing the monarch in question puts the reader at ease that this was the intended king: the "redirect" message indicates that the system hasn't been playing tricks, and that this was the page to which you were supposed to be led.

Examples

Examples of common names that Wikipedia uses instead of a more elaborate, more formal or more scientifically precise version include:

Bill Clinton (not William Jefferson Clinton)
George W. Bush (not George Walker Bush)
Tony Blair (not Anthony Charles Lynton Blair)
Julius Caesar (not Imperator Gaius Iulius Caesar Divus)
Occam's Razor (not Ockham's Razor)
Venus de Milo (not Aphrodite of Melos)
Guinea pig (not Cavia)
Sea cucumber (not Holothurian)

Use the common English name

Not the common Latin or scientific name if there is a more common English name: Example: Dog (not Canis lupus familiaris)
Not the common local name if there is a more common English name: Example: Brussels (not Brussel nor Bruxelles nor Brüssel)

In the case local varieties of English have a different spelling, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English.

Don't overdo it

In cases where the common name of a subject is misleading, then it is sometimes reasonable to fall back on a well-accepted alternative. For example a "common" name for a tsunami is "tidal wave" (this term being less often used for the tides-related tidal bore). For this reason, the Tidal wave page is a disambiguation page, with links to the two other pages, and not a page giving details about either tsunami or tidal bore.

Also, some terms are in common usage but are commonly regarded as offensive to large groups of people (Mormon Church, for example). In those cases use widely known alternatives (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). When in doubt, check a mainstream reference work. A term can only be considered offensive if a verifiable, authoritative source can be quoted as citing it as such.

This does not mean that we should avoid using widely known pseudonyms like Mark Twain, Marilyn Monroe, Billy the Kid, or widely known common names of animals and other things. But it does mean that we need to temper common usage when the commonly used term is unreasonably misleading or commonly regarded as offensive to one or more groups of people.

Subpages

Policy regarding changed MediaWiki software

An article with a slash (/) in its title is treated like any other page, as there are no longer any special subpage features in the main (encyclopedia) namespace. Accordingly, the use of subpage notation when naming articles is discouraged.

If contributors still want to use the former "slashed" subpage naming, they have the burden of showing that a subpage-like name is necessary, otherwise articles using such names will be moved to a page in line with normal article titles.

Example: use "James T. Kirk" or "James T. Kirk (Star Trek)", not "Star Trek/James T. Kirk", for an article on the fictional character Captain Kirk.

Unnecessary subpages existing prior to this convention are in the process of being moved to their own, conventionally-named page. For discussions leading to the use of this convention see the Talk page.

Slashes may be used freely when present in original titles, or usual terminology. Examples: Face/Off, Input/output.

Subsidiary articles

The present convention for articles providing more detail on a given topic is using the {{Main|<subpage>}} and {{Details|<subpage>}} templates, in accordance with Wikipedia:Summary style; such templates are placed under a section header, each instance of these templates providing a link to a subpage.

Occasionally these subsidiary pages — if containing content that is only relevant as an elaboration of a shorter paragraph on the main page — can have more complex page names, that is, if only intended to be accessed by clicking from the main article. Example: Isaac Newton has as one of its pages on sub-topics: Isaac Newton's early life and achievements.

However, if a "common name" for such subsidiary page is possible, that is always preferred.

Exceptions

Many wikipedia naming conventions guidelines contain implicit or explicit exceptions to the "common names" principle. Some of these exceptions are due to technical limitations, for example "C sharp", as "C#" is technically not possible as a page name.

Some exceptions follow from guidelines that give recommendations for enhanced precision, cleaner disambiguation and/or solution of naming conflicts, which might lead to article names that are rather "the most obvious" than strictly spoken "the most used". For example, SCO Group and not SCO (which is "most used" to refer to the SCO Group company).

Other exceptions are contained in the Manual of Style, for example the National varieties of English section in that guideline leads to fixed-wing aircraft being used instead of aeroplane or airplane, in order not to give precedence to either British or American spelling.

Several guidelines try to systematise certain types of article titles, for example article titles using abbreviations:

Acronyms: NASA and not N.A.S.A. or N. A. S. A.
Abbreviating names of people: H. G. Wells and not H.G. Wells or HG Wells

Other guidelines rather systematise titles of articles grouped by topic, for example M/S Herald of Free Enterprise and not Herald of Free Enterprise, according to Wikipedia:naming conventions (ships).

For articles on people some minor practical exceptions are contained in Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people) - these are however hardly sufficient to cover the complexities for naming royals and other nobility: hence Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles), and several other nobility-related Naming Conventions guidelines, contain many detailed exceptions.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Wikipedia subcat guideline|naming conventions|Common names|[[WP:NC(CN)]]}}
+{{guideline in a nutshell|Except where [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions|other established naming conventions]] give a different indication, use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things}}
-{{main|Wikipedia:Naming conventions}}
 '''Convention:''' Use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things. The principal exception is in the case of naming royalty and people with titles. For details of the naming conventions in those cases, see the [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)]] page. This is however not the only exception, see "[[#Exceptions|Exceptions]]" section below.
+==General principle==
 When choosing a name for a page ask yourself: What word would the average user of the Wikipedia put into the search engine?
 Wikipedia is not a place to advocate a title change in order to reflect recent scholarship. The articles themselves reflect recent scholarship but the titles should represent common usage.
-Remember that a link is the title of the page it links to.
 Titles should be as simple as possible without being too general.