User talk:Somedifferentstuff: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:10, 23 August 2013

AN/I

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --OpenFuture (talk) 11:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Related to the above message; please respect your other editors and leave an edit summary. It doesn't have to be long - it can be anything as short as "reply", "note" or "comment" on a talk page - but try to make it descriptive (i.e. "adding source", "changing wording", etc). Thank you, m.o.p 11:32, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Just to let you know that your excellent work at the OWS articles has not gone unnoticed. Gandydancer (talk) 09:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Modest Barnstar
		In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.7.36 (talk) 20:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Somedifferentstuff ! VR _talk 03:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled section

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you.ProfJustice (talk) 02:03, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:ProfJustice was blocked for 24 hours.[1] Somedifferentstuff (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for cleaning up the socialism article. Byelf2007 (talk) 9 September 2012

Untitled section

(==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Somedifferentstuff actually was the reason the page was frozen. Potential sock puppetry. Edit warning on his page 2x. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.252.50.93 (talk) 16:24, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:98.252.50.93 was blocked for 1 week.[2] Somedifferentstuff (talk) 18:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Great work on Edward Snowden. — Pretzels^Hii! 19:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Irony

I'm sorry to have reverted your edits on this page. You have cut back the lead to the bare bones and left the assertion that irony is only saying the opposite of what is intended. I know some dictionaries say only that, but others (and books on the subject) allow the wider definition that was there before. Several of us argued for a long time about what to include, before settling on the wider definition. There may be a point about missing citations in places, but I suggest you tag these so that I (and others) can work on them. Myrvin (talk) 11:11, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I modified my edit this time and gave a lengthy summary. Somedifferentstuff (talk) 13:56, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	For your good grace when someone else reverts your edits! Sminthopsis84 (talk) 11:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sminthopsis. Somedifferentstuff (talk) 16:49, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 64: / Line 64: @@
 |}
 :Thanks Sminthopsis. [[User:Somedifferentstuff|Somedifferentstuff]] ([[User talk:Somedifferentstuff#top|talk]]) 16:49, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
-== Zeitgeist reverts ==
-Hey, you're over [[WP:3RR]] limit on the [[Zeitgeist: The Movie]] article.  I reverted your changes as I think they were too much but did leave the section tag in place.  I'm hoping you'll use the talk page to discuss this and not keep trying to force your changes in place with others object.  I'd really prefer not to see this on the [[WP:EWN]].  <b><font color="darkred">[[User:Ravensfire|Ravensfire]]</font></b> <font color="black">([[User talk:Ravensfire|talk]])</font> 17:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
-:No I'm not. Read [[WP:3RR]]. -- [[User:Somedifferentstuff|Somedifferentstuff]] ([[User talk:Somedifferentstuff#top|talk]]) 18:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
-== [[WP:AN3|Edit warring noticeboard]] ==
-I have reported your edit warring to the noticeboard...you were already warned about 3RR above...3RR is not an entitlement. The report is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Somedifferentstuff_reported_by_User:MONGO_.28Result:_.29 here].--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 04:33, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
-== August 2013 ==
-<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for your [[WP:DE|disruption]] caused by [[WP:EW|edit warring]] and violation of the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[WP:CON|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}} below this notice, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] ([[User talk:Black Kite|talk]]) 13:47, 23 August 2013 (UTC)</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block -->