User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish

Archives (Index)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

Please stop your disruptive editing for Georgia College

Again, this is not marketing material. This has been researched. Instead of being snarky, why dont you share information on how to submit the changes to be proposed by the community. Again, these edits are being submitted in good faith and I would appreciate a little help in making them stick instead of getting messages from moderators who aren't helpful in the matter.

While I am a paid editor, I am more in line with the views of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Don%27t_cry_COI — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsmith0909 (talk • contribs)

Year after year, Georgia College has made appearances in various categories of excellent education... The school boasts over... students at the college had vibrant social activities and traditions. If you think this type of language isn't promotional or is even slightly close to WP:NPOV or an encyclopedic tone, I don't know what to tell you. Also, please sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ after your message. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Dear ScottishFinnishRadish, your tireless contributions to keep Wikipedia clean are very much appreciated. YOU make a difference! Many thanks. Gentleman wiki (talk) 02:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

False accusations of vandalism and frivolous page deletion requests

Please stop claiming that well cited additions to pages are vandalism because you don’t personally like the additions. Rather, why not add something constructive and well cited to the page, instead of writing on my talk page as if you are not yourself the pot calling the kettle black by deleting well cited information and flagging the entire page for deletion. --Hudsonmohawk (talk) 05:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

I suggest you discuss this on the article talk page, rather than continuing to edit war. Per WP:BRD, you made a bold edit, it was reverted, and now we discuss the issue to reach consensus. I do agree that I should have used the "non-constructive edit" rollback in WP:REDWARN, rather than vandalism. For that I apologize. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

I suggest you practice what you preach: I only wrote on your talk page after you made a false accusation of vandalism on mine. This issue and your bad faith vandalism report and deletion request have been well documented on the articles talk page and the deletion discussion page. Hudsonmohawk (talk) 17:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Boris Johnson

Hello. You have recently contributed to this article or its talk page. Please see this discussion on the talk page. You are welcome to take part if you are interested. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Regarding "the waiting to be finally approved" edit on DiCaprio's lede on his Wikipedia page.

Shutter Island (2010) and The Great Gatsby (2013) throughout the years have grown to be huge fan favorites, wildly popular among the general public and hugely successful at the box office, thus very deserving to be and appear in the lede of Mr DiCaprio's page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.182.181.187 (talk) 16:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

This should be discussed on the article talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Eritrea on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bodhidharma on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Okay, Whoever did this must pay the price, Thank you BillSenor9000 (UTC)

Avoid disruptive revert

Plz avoid disruptive revert as you made here. As your edit summary says and i quote "please discuss on talk page per WP:BRD". Here, plz note that BRD did not applicable here as this is the case of misuse/inappropriate use of BRD , essay on BRD says that and the same i posted on the talk page of TrangaBellam that "BRD does not encourage reverting, but recognizes that reversions happen. When reverting, be specific about your reasons in the edit summary and use links if needed". the user trengabellam didnt provided any reason for using BRD. DavidWood11 (talk) 13:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this on the article talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

The talk is already goingcon the talk page. This is regarding your distruptive revert. Plz avoid DavidWood11 (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

If there is discussion going on you should not revert until they're is consensus for inclusion. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flag of Afghanistan on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tlalli on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Francisco Franco

The user who made the changes is the one who should seek consensus for them, at least this is how Wikipedia is supposed to work, the Fascist-related categories and template were on the article for years until some user who isn't even interested in discussion decided to remove them, they are the status quo and so should be restored unless there is actually consensus for removing them, not the other way around. -- Special:Contributions/2804:248:f632:a100:79c9:43f6:e340:6133 (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

I think you should reinstate the categories as the status quo, as long as no consensus to remove them is reached, only 1 user removed them, that is not enough for consensus, futhermore, those categories were on the article for quite a long time now, there was an attempt to remove one of them in January 2020, but it got quickly reinstated due to lack of consensus, lastly, per WP:BRD the onus is on the user who made the changes to seek consensus for them. -- Special:Contributions/2804:248:f632:a100:79c9:43f6:e340:6133 (talk) 20:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

I'd prefer to keep this discussion on the article talk page. There was a second user on the talk page who is also against the categories, so at this time it seems there is a weak consensus against the inclusion. This is why I've suggested discussion, or failing that, an RFC. You can see on the talk page as far back as 2018 this has been contentious. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

You're tangentially involved in an ANI discussion

I wanted to notify you that you're tangentially involved in an issue I've raised at ANI in this discussion. Thanks! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 19:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I'll review my participation and the discussion after and see if I have anything to add. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)