Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miller's Girl: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:41, 6 February 2023

Miller's Girl

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON article about an as yet unreleased film, not yet the subject of sufficient reliable source coverage to exempt it from WP:NFO. As always, Wikipedia does not want to indiscriminately maintain an article about every single film that enters the production pipeline -- for any number of reasons, films that enter production don't always come out the other end as finished films, and even a finished and released film can still fail to meet notability criteria at all, so films normally aren't notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia until they have been released and are garnering real reviews from professional film critics.
There is a common (but erroneous) belief that films are automatically entitled to have articles as soon as principal photography has commenced, but NFILM explicitly states that "films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines" -- but with just two casting announcements and a six-year-old listicle of unproduced screenplays, this does not yet have enough sourcing to establish that.
Obviously no prejudice against recreation if and when it does come out and start getting reviewed, but a couple of casting announcements is not enough coverage for it to already have an article now. Bearcat (talk) 23:46, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 23:46, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It could be notable later, but it just isn't right now. Stopasianhate (talk) 01:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:TOOSOON, but the article could return if the film turns out to be notable. TH1980 (talk) 03:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It meets notability based not only on the fact that is is a real thing that has completed production and is a well sourced and written article - which is basis enough for it to exist in the main space - but it also has a number of name stars including the lead actor from The Hobbit as well as the lead actress from Netflix's hit series Wednesday and is based off a script once featured on the exclusive Blacklist of Hollywood best unproduced scripts. This is not some obscure film, low budget student film. TheMovieGuy (talk) 01:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :'''Delete'''. It could be notable later, but it just isn't right now. [[User:Stopasianhate|Stopasianhate]] ([[User talk:Stopasianhate|talk]]) 01:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 :'''Delete''' as per [[WP:TOOSOON]], but the article could return if the film turns out to be notable. [[User:TH1980|TH1980]] ([[User talk:TH1980|talk]]) 03:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
+:'''Keep'''. It meets notability based not only on the fact that is is a real thing that has completed production and is a well sourced and written article - which is basis enough for it to exist in the main space - but it also has a number of name stars including the lead actor from ''The Hobbit'' as well as the lead actress from Netflix's hit series ''Wednesday'' and is based off a script once featured on the exclusive ''Blacklist'' of Hollywood best unproduced scripts. This is not some obscure film, low budget student film. [[User:TheMovieGuy|TheMovieGuy]] ([[User talk:TheMovieGuy|talk]]) 01:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)