Talk:Senet: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:45, 14 January 2021

Template:Vital article

Ancient Egypt Start‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Board and table games Start‑class Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Senat? Senet?

Are Senet and Senat different games or (as I suspect) actually two alternate spellings of the same game? Luis Dantas 16:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are the same, I will merge "Senat" here. Andreas Kaufmann 22:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Backgammon

Maybe we should add some reference to backgammon here, as it is frequently claimed that Senet is an ancient antecedent to backgammon. Is there merit in this?

--92.14.178.226 (talk) 00:24, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly every source I have ever seen on the history of backgammon says this is true. Of course, it really needs a footnote. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 00:51, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lost

-- In the "Lost" mention, shouldn't it include that the whole Series is how Jacob and his brother play Senet using HUmans as pieces? That the end where they all are living in a "limbo" and waiting for the last one to die and join them so they can all "finish the game together"?--79.141.46.227 (talk) 15:52, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wordings in "In Modern Culture"

Some rewordings to fit the tone of an encyclopedia would be great for this section.D65535 (talk) 09:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Senet/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Though not a member of the Ancient Egypt WikiProject, I feel that I can safely evaluate Senet as start-class. So far, it is informative and does not need cleanup or NPOV fixing. However, it is composed of nought but an introduction and one short section of prose. If there are more editors willing to contribute, I'm sure the article can be expanded greatly. --Gray Porpoise 22:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 05:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Senet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080918080211/http://www.gamesmuseum.uwaterloo.ca/Archives/Piccione/index.html to http://www.gamesmuseum.uwaterloo.ca/Archives/Piccione/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rules?

But what arethe conjectured rules? I guess one moves forward... Zezen (talk) 08:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian Name

The Egyptian name of the game was 𓊃𓈖𓏏𓏠 (znt), which means “passing” both in the sense of surpassing and in the sense of passing away. I’m unable to find any attestations of the phrase znt nt ḥbꜥ(t), and as far as I can tell Piccione does not provide a reference for it. The phrase ḥꜥb znt (“to play senet”) is common, but nominalized ḥbꜥt (“game”) is not attested until the 3rd c. BC and can hardly have been part of the original name. Best to cite the Egyptian form as simple znt. Rhemmiel (talk) 13:39, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Game box photo

Even thought the brown (with green pawns) game box is a 2-in-1 set containing Senet, the photo only shows a side with a different game. Perhaps photo should be replaced? The game itself, according to the Metropolitan Museum of Art page, from where the photo comes from, is called Tjau, though i've also seen it being called Aseb or even Game of Twenty Squares (yeah, just like Royal Game of Ur).

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 The Egyptian name of the game was 𓊃𓈖𓏏𓏠 (''znt''), which means “passing” both in the sense of surpassing and in the sense of passing away. I’m unable to find any attestations of the phrase ''znt nt ḥbꜥ(t)'', and as far as I can tell Piccione does not provide a reference for it. The phrase ''ḥꜥb znt'' (“to play senet”) is common, but nominalized ''ḥbꜥt'' (“game”) is not attested until the 3rd c. BC and can hardly have been part of the original name. Best to cite the Egyptian form as simple ''znt''. [[User:Rhemmiel|Rhemmiel]] ([[User talk:Rhemmiel|talk]]) 13:39, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
+== Game box photo ==
+Even thought the brown (with green pawns) game box is a 2-in-1 set containing Senet, the photo only shows a side with a different game. Perhaps photo should be replaced?
+The game itself, according to the Metropolitan Museum of Art page, from where the photo comes from, is called Tjau, though i've also seen it being called Aseb or even Game of Twenty Squares (yeah, just like Royal Game of Ur).