Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamer Atta: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Aamer Atta: delete |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Delete''' This is not cricketpedia. The article totally 100% fails GNG. It is time we stopped keeping such rubbish articles.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 19:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' This is not cricketpedia. The article totally 100% fails GNG. It is time we stopped keeping such rubbish articles.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 19:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Fails basic notability criteria [[WP:N]]. Wikipedia is not...[[WP:NOT]]. --[[User:Tsistunagiska|<span style="color:#b76e79">'''A'''</span><span style="color:#be4f60">'''Rose'''</span><span style="color:#b87333">'''Wolf'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Tsistunagiska|<small><span style="color:#e75480">'''Talk'''</span></small>]]) 20:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Fails basic notability criteria [[WP:N]]. Wikipedia is not...[[WP:NOT]]. --[[User:Tsistunagiska|<span style="color:#b76e79">'''A'''</span><span style="color:#be4f60">'''Rose'''</span><span style="color:#b87333">'''Wolf'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Tsistunagiska|<small><span style="color:#e75480">'''Talk'''</span></small>]]) 20:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Too short and not notable.[[User:Illuminator123|Illuminator123]] ([[User talk:Illuminator123|talk]]) 19:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:23, 21 January 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aamer Atta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. No coverage found. Störm (talk) 01:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Has played 8 games at the highest domestic level. StickyWicket (talk) 21:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:NCRIC. Ten days ago, I reminded this editor about the closing comments of a past RfC "As with the RfC on secondary school notability, this should not be an invitation to "flood AfD with indiscriminate or excessive nominations". This is one of approx. a dozen back-to-back nominations made today within a 30 minute window, suggesting no attempt at WP:BEFORE was used pre-nomination. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This is not cricketpedia. The article totally 100% fails GNG. It is time we stopped keeping such rubbish articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails basic notability criteria WP:N. Wikipedia is not...WP:NOT. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 20:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Too short and not notable.Illuminator123 (talk) 19:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)