User talk:Lukan27

civlity

We comment on the content not users, if you have an issue with a user take it to THEIR talk page or report them to wp:ani. Do not discuss their actions (or ask other users to examine them) on article talk pages.Slatersteven (talk) 14:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

My comment to IHateAccounts' comment is necessary for the discussion at hand in the entry on Marjorie Greene. IHateAccounts clearly attempts a sly ad hominem argument, and bringing that out to the light is (unfortunately) necessary. And by the way, it's civilty, not civlity. Lukan27 (talk) 14:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Plus, if we comment on the content and not the users, then IHateAccounts shouldn't comment on my number of edits, wouldn't you agree? Lukan27 (talk) 15:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

What he does is not a justification for what you do. If you continue to make ad hominem arguments I will report you.Slatersteven (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

I also suggest you read wp:spa.Slatersteven (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

And never have I said that. I'm saying that my comment to IHateAccounts' comment is (sadly) necessary for the discussion at hand. This is not a single-purpose account, and never has been. I'm not committing any ad hominem fallacies against you. You can report me all you want. Please stop making threats, and if you would be so kind to also comment on IHateAccounts' talk page how we're not supposed to comment on users (and not just on my talk page). Lukan27 (talk) 15:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

I will also ask you to stop mansplaining me about Wikipedia, thank you. Lukan27 (talk) 15:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 11:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

@Slatersteven I have to ask of you to stop labelling my account as a single-purpose account. I've had this account for over a decade, and have made contributions outside of M. Greene and similar subjects. Just because I participate in the talk section on Marjorie T. Greene, and disagree with certain contributors there doesn't make this a single-purpose account, and doesn't constitute disruption either. And for your information I'm in no way a Qanon-supporter. I'm merely interested in fair handling or portrayal of M. Greene, and others. If you persist in labelling my account as a single-purpose account without sufficient grounds or arguments and label me as a disruptor on the M. Greene article - or brand me as a Qanon-supporter, trying to oust me - then I'm afraid I have to report you. Thank you for understanding. Lukan27 (talk) 12:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

This was a courtesy notice to tell you there was an ANI you might be a party to (as in affected by, as full protection means you might not be able to edit it).Slatersteven (talk) 12:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

@Slatersteven And on that ANI you say that I "clearly [am] a party to this situation" in extension of talk of single-purpose accounts and an alleged Qanon-front. I happen to agree that we can't let a Qanon-mob decide what's going to be on the entry or not. Total removal of anything "conspiracy theory" and Qanon is in no way acceptable - these media reactions are substantial in the sense that they portray what's going on right now, but the use of them in the entry is highly dubious and biased. But right now you and a few other contributors give the impression that you don't like being challenged on the points regarding her being labelled as a "conspiracy theorist". That's not acceptable for me either (if that's you genuine opinion). Lukan27 (talk) 12:53, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

@Slatersteven And if you're genuinely worried about single-purpose accounts, I will kindly suggest that you review IHateAccounts' account and history. This user's account is about three months old only, and seems to have only made edits that are highly related to the latest American election. Lukan27 (talk) 12:56, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Lukan27! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

---

As an aside, I'd strongly recommend editing in less contentious areas of Wikipedia first. I've also recently started editing again after a long hiatus and I learned this recently. (If you browse my contributions, you'll note that I'm terrible at following my own advice. I still try to limit myself.) I originally restarted editing with the approach of "I have to fix the garbage! RAWR!" and quickly realized that's just a great way to work myself up for nothing.

I've found that editing articles that aren't politically charged that I have expertise in, about my local school district, and other similar topics has proven to be a much more enjoyable experience.

Let me know if you have some topic in mind and I'll help you in that regard. Thanks, Jdphenix (talk) 14:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)