Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groht: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 03:38, 28 January 2021

Groht

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced "surname" page containing only entries for a non-notable photographer and a fictional character not mentioned in the target page. No encyclopedic value. PamD 12:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. PamD 12:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subjects they refer to are non-notable. –Cupper52^Discuss! 12:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mockelberg, page does not meet the criteria for a DAB or a set index article. Servers no navigation function, only entries are nn fictional characters w/o articles. // Timothy :: talk 13:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This page is need to keep and protect, the surname Groht is a real surname, a lot of evidence can found on the web, don't judge this page casually. Hope everyone can help keep the page, thank you. --Werstone (talk) 2:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Please could you share some of this coverage on the web with us? Thanks Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This page is deserved to keep, a lot of evidence can prove the surname is real, thank you. --Lord Djibril (talk) 3:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

I have no doubts that the surname is real. Have you got any evidence that it has received extensive coverage? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information WP:NOT. If there is a notable person with the surname of Groht then by all means, write the article on them, include sources and it should stay. A surname is not notable because of the name but who has the name and that is where the notability should lie, with the individual person. If you get enough articles written about persons with the Groht surname then you could, theoretically, create a category for this name and link all of them together. It does not deserve a stand-a-lone article. --ARose Wolf 17:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just existing does not make a surname notable. There are no sources to verrify anything, and verrifiability is the key to Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This page is updated, go to see the article again, surname Groht is a notable surname, evidence of notability is been updated. thank you. --Everstonerelm (talk) 6:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 *'''Delete''' just existing does not make a surname notable. There are no sources to verrify anything, and verrifiability is the key to Wikipedia.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 17:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Germany|list of Germany-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 18:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Keep'''. This page is updated, go to see the article again, surname Groht is a notable surname, evidence of notability is been updated. thank you. --[[User:Everstonerelm|Everstonerelm]] ([[Usertalk:Everstonerelm|talk]]) 6:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)