Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wai Thu La Pyae: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
recommend delete
Akronowner (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
*'''Speedy delete''' per all above. I have read the only reference and it is about a completely different person, with no mention of this article's creator. [[User:Pinktoebeans|<span style="color:#ff9dab">pinktoebeans</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Pinktoebeans|(talk)]]</sup> 22:01, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete''' per all above. I have read the only reference and it is about a completely different person, with no mention of this article's creator. [[User:Pinktoebeans|<span style="color:#ff9dab">pinktoebeans</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Pinktoebeans|(talk)]]</sup> 22:01, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. No claim to notability is made here. As Pinktoebeans indicates, the only reference cited is about a completely different person. --[[User:Metropolitan90|Metropolitan90]] [[User talk:Metropolitan90|(talk)]] 05:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. No claim to notability is made here. As Pinktoebeans indicates, the only reference cited is about a completely different person. --[[User:Metropolitan90|Metropolitan90]] [[User talk:Metropolitan90|(talk)]] 05:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
*'''Speedy Delete''' Current sources doesn't indicate [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Akronowner|Akronowner]] ([[User talk:Akronowner|talk]]) 05:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:52, 5 February 2021

Wai Thu La Pyae (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable student actor, no major roles and no in depth coverage in any language. CUPIDICAE💕 16:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not opposed to a speedy deletion, I just wanted a final nail in the coffin since they've repeatedly created it. It's bordering on a hoax, actually. CUPIDICAE💕 18:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm guessing that it's a vanity article judging by the fact that the user has no interest in editing outside of this article and is doing their absolute best to disrupt this discussion. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
With all of that in mind, I have requested salting Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]