Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Isabelle of Isenburg: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*'''Delete''' - notability is not inherited, and there's no evidence that she's notable in her own right. [[User:Extraordinary Writ|Extraordinary Writ]] ([[User talk:Extraordinary Writ|talk]]) 20:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - notability is not inherited, and there's no evidence that she's notable in her own right. [[User:Extraordinary Writ|Extraordinary Writ]] ([[User talk:Extraordinary Writ|talk]]) 20:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - she is relevant, together with her husband, was representative of an active mediatized family from Germany. [[User:Cronista de Historias|Cronista de Historias]] ([[User talk:Cronista de Historias|talk]]) 22:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - she is relevant, together with her husband, was representative of an active mediatized family from Germany. [[User:Cronista de Historias|Cronista de Historias]] ([[User talk:Cronista de Historias|talk]]) 22:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''delete''' per ab0ve.--[[User:IN|Alcremie]] ([[User talk:IN|talk]]) 08:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:59, 12 February 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Princess Isabelle of Isenburg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can find no evidence of WP:GNG notability (it's almost an A7). The article says that her father is the heir of the last ruler of a tiny state abolished 200 years ago, and her late husband also was the heir of the last rules of another tiny state abolished 200 years ago. The only content specific to the person (and not her relation to others) seems to be her date of birth, not quite enough for a BLP I think. —Kusma (t·c) 11:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Kusma (t·c) 11:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. —Kusma (t·c) 11:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No indication of notability and a clear case of WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Lennart97 (talk) 14:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (lack of notability). — csc-1
- Delete Whatever her career is, it's not notable and not stated in the article. Oaktree b (talk) 16:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete non notable --Devokewater (talk) 17:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Weak case of notability. Mukt (talk) 18:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - notability is not inherited, and there's no evidence that she's notable in her own right. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - she is relevant, together with her husband, was representative of an active mediatized family from Germany. Cronista de Historias (talk) 22:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- delete per ab0ve.--Alcremie (talk) 08:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)