Jump to content

Talk:Vodka war: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m Tagging + talk page general fixes using AWB (10093)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYK talk|19 March|2007|entry=...that '''[[Vodka Belt]]''', an informal term for the territory where [[vodka]] is the most popular [[alcohol]]ic [[beverage]], wages a '''[[vodka war]]''' in support for vodka's traditional ingredients?}}
{{DYK talk|19 March|2007|entry=...that '''[[Vodka Belt]]''', an informal term for the territory where [[vodka]] is the most popular [[alcohol]]ic [[beverage]], wages a '''[[vodka war]]''' in support for vodka's traditional ingredients?}}
{{WikiProject European Union| class = Start | importance = Low}}
{{WikiProject European Union| class = Start | importance = Low}}
{{WPSPIRIT}}

==REDUNDANCE AND PARTISAN==
==REDUNDANCE AND PARTISAN==
What is the need to repeat twice time : "Vodka made of waste"? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Razafygomez|Razafygomez]] ([[User talk:Razafygomez|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Razafygomez|contribs]]) 06:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
What is the need to repeat twice time : "Vodka made of waste"? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Razafygomez|Razafygomez]] ([[User talk:Razafygomez|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Razafygomez|contribs]]) 06:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 09:39, 5 March 2021

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconEuropean Union Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSpirits Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.


Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:
  • Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

REDUNDANCE AND PARTISAN

What is the need to repeat twice time : "Vodka made of waste"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Razafygomez (talkcontribs) 06:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism: obvious protectionism

Bourbon, for instance, has to clear a quality bar including 3 years in the cask, so even cheap bourbon tastes pretty good, though may leave a lethal hangover. From what I have learned, vodka is distilled to rubbing alcohol, and then diluted. So technically, it can be diluted with distillate impurities (as is done with Canadian Crown Royal and Puerto Rican Bacardi) to taste like something other than vodka, and still be vodka. I cannot be the only person to notice this obvious trade protectionism, though, if it were up to me, WTO would be the name of a locked-down mental ward. --John Bessa (talk) 19:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your lack of knowledge of alcoholic beverages is incredibly obvious. Calling Canadian whisky vodka with "distillate impurities" is so ridiculous and insulting as to simply require calling out. All spirit in Canadian whisky is aged at least three years, and is distilled below the 95% threshold of neutrality. Theres no codka in it at all. And bourbon actually has no minimum aging period (it does need at least 2 years, not 3, for it to be labelled "straight") If you don't know what you're talking about, don't speak.
Because it undermines your rather valid point about the obvious protectionism involved here. oknazevad (talk) 13:12, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]