Talk:Continuously variable transmission: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:33, 8 March 2021

Engineering C‑class Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology B‑class

	Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Continuously variable transmission article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 60 days

Placeholder section

New topics will go below this one. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 03:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On the section for epicyclic CVT's ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuously_variable_transmission#Epicyclic ) the description refers to friction discs and then indicates the Prius E-CVT as an example. The E-CVT is epicyclic but uses differential input from multiple motors to produce ratio variability. There is not a friction component. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.5.110.26 (talk) 17:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrostatic drives are not just for small "lawn mower" applications

Hydrostatic drives are used on quite large earthmoving equipment , notably large bulldozers. Here is an example of a 770HP drive https://www.mobilehydraulictips.com/fluid-power-drives-mega-dozer/ . The section should be reworded slightly to note that hydrostatic transmissions are very efficient at all power levels. Salbayeng (talk) 22:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone tell me why hydraulic systems are wrongly referred to as hydrostatic ?

In a hydrostatic system the fluid does not move, it is static = not move. All hydraulic power transmission systems rely on fluid movement and are therefore hydrodynamic.

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 Hydrostatic drives are used on quite large earthmoving equipment , notably large bulldozers.  Here is an example of a 770HP drive https://www.mobilehydraulictips.com/fluid-power-drives-mega-dozer/ . The section should be reworded slightly to note that hydrostatic transmissions are very efficient at all power levels. [[User:Salbayeng|Salbayeng]] ([[User talk:Salbayeng|talk]]) 22:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
+== Can someone tell me why hydraulic systems are wrongly referred to as hydrostatic ? ==
+In a hydrostatic system the fluid does not move, it is static = not move. All hydraulic power transmission systems rely on fluid movement and are therefore hydrodynamic.