User talk:Wikimusicplaystation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:01, 23 March 2021

Hello, Wikimusicplaystation, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 02:31, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Cha (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:MUSICBIO - Spotify, YouTube, Facebook and AppleMusic are not acceptable or reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Cha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Cha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikimusicplaystation! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:David Cha

The main issue is that the article needs to satisfy the requirements of WP:MUSICBIO, in that it needs to demonstrate that there is significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources. The Malay Mail is a suitable secondary source. The English translation of the China Press doesn't appear to make mention of David Cha at all (now that might be the translation however I did a search of his Chinese name on the original and couldn't come up with anything either). Based on that there is really only one source, whereas you need multiple sources. You also need to remove all the other unreliable sources, Spotify, YouTube, Facebook and AppleMusic and replace them with reliable secondary sources. I hope that helps - drop me a line if you need more feedback - happy editing. Dan arndt (talk) 09:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC) Hi Dan. I understand now. Btw, let me check the chinapress article again. Tq[reply]

Revision as of 09:39, 23 March 2021 edit Dan arndt (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 154,732 edits →‎Draft:David Cha: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:01, 23 March 2021 edit undo Wikimusicplaystation (talk \| contribs) 17 edits →‎Draft:David Cha Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Next edit →
Line 39:		Line 39:

	The main issue is that the article needs to satisfy the requirements of [[WP:MUSICBIO]], in that it needs to demonstrate that there is significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources. ''The Malay Mail '' is a suitable secondary source. The English translation of the ''China Press'' doesn't appear to make mention of David Cha at all (now that might be the translation however I did a search of his Chinese name on the original and couldn't come up with anything either). Based on that there is really only one source, whereas you need multiple sources. You also need to remove all the other unreliable sources, Spotify, YouTube, Facebook and AppleMusic and replace them with reliable secondary sources. I hope that helps - drop me a line if you need more feedback - happy editing. [[User:Dan arndt\|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt\|talk]]) 09:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)		The main issue is that the article needs to satisfy the requirements of [[WP:MUSICBIO]], in that it needs to demonstrate that there is significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources. ''The Malay Mail '' is a suitable secondary source. The English translation of the ''China Press'' doesn't appear to make mention of David Cha at all (now that might be the translation however I did a search of his Chinese name on the original and couldn't come up with anything either). Based on that there is really only one source, whereas you need multiple sources. You also need to remove all the other unreliable sources, Spotify, YouTube, Facebook and AppleMusic and replace them with reliable secondary sources. I hope that helps - drop me a line if you need more feedback - happy editing. [[User:Dan arndt\|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt\|talk]]) 09:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
			Hi Dan. I understand now. Btw, let me check the chinapress article again. Tq