Talk:EJBCA: Difference between revisions
Primetomas (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Primetomas (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
Also, most links in See also are already in the text and could be removed right? |
Also, most links in See also are already in the text and could be removed right? |
||
[[User:Primetomas|Primetomas]] ([[User talk:Primetomas|talk]]) 06:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC) |
[[User:Primetomas|Primetomas]] ([[User talk:Primetomas|talk]]) 06:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC) |
||
The links to similar software is already listed, with the exception of [[OpenXPKI]], as "open source implementations" on the page [[Public_key_infrastructure]], that have a more complete listing. Does that make it irrelevant here? |
|||
[[User:Primetomas|Primetomas]] ([[User talk:Primetomas|talk]]) 06:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:22, 18 April 2021
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 April 2021. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
 | Java Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Computing Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Untitled
Just announced to the community that it exists.. it would be nice to have a day or two to provide some more info..—Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeiZai6Y (talk • contribs) 09:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Do you have any sources other than the project's website? Any articles, news releases, etc? UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 12:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
A good start but this article needs improvement
I like the fact that you put EJBCA in. But it currently rather reads like a catalog sheet than like a Wikipedia article.
- You should make sure that every information has a notable source. Currently your article looks like original research
- The whole overall context is missing: the history of EJBCA, the context where it is relevant.
- Also critical reflections are needed. What are the weak points? Why are commercial systems still relevant? And sources, discussing it would make sense.
- Are there notable examples, perhaps open source portals or big Cloud applications which use EJBCA
Thx for making it better
ScienceGuard (talk) 18:32, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Remove dead or redundant links
1. The link to: A workflow based architecture for Public Key Infrastructure; Johan Eklund; TRITA-CSC-E 2010:047 Is dead, and KTH does not seem to keep an archive of these anymore. I suggest removing it. 2. In External links, only the first one should be kept imo (reverting my edit that added them). The others are linked from there, or already present in the article (github). I suggest removing the three links below the "official site".
COI: I am the founder of this opensource project Primetomas (talk) 05:51, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
See also link to similar software?
Would it be good for the reader if See also linked to similar software such as let's encrypt (already present), OpenCA,DogTag,OpenXPKI, OpenSSL?
COI: founder of this open source project Primetomas (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Also, most links in See also are already in the text and could be removed right? Primetomas (talk) 06:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
The links to similar software is already listed, with the exception of OpenXPKI, as "open source implementations" on the page Public_key_infrastructure, that have a more complete listing. Does that make it irrelevant here? Primetomas (talk) 06:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)