Talk:Aluminium powder: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:00, 26 April 2021

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aluminium powder article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Materials Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Rocket fuel

Use as rocket fuel component?88.159.64.170 (talk) 22:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC) Y done Andrew🐉(talk) 19:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unscientific (sounding) claim?

"Aluminium powder is non-toxic and is not harmful unless injected directly in a major blood vessel such as the aorta."

Citation badly needed in my opinion. This claim sounds made up to me. Mariusoei (talk) 18:05, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 == Unscientific (sounding) claim? ==
-"Aluminum powder is non-toxic and is not harmful unless injected directly in a major blood vessel such as the aorta."
+"Aluminium powder is non-toxic and is not harmful unless injected directly in a major blood vessel such as the aorta."
 Citation badly needed in my opinion. This claim sounds made up to me. [[User:Mariusoei|Mariusoei]] ([[User talk:Mariusoei|talk]]) 18:05, 11 April 2019 (UTC)