Venus of Moravany: Difference between revisions
Added origin of Venus name and its links to antrocentic critical interpretation. Tags: nowiki added Visual edit |
minor grammar edit |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
=== Goddess of Beauty === |
=== Goddess of Beauty === |
||
The Venus of Moravany received the name 'Venus' due to Upper Palaeolithic female figurines collectively being named "Venus figurines." This derives from the [[Roman mythology|Roman]] |
The Venus of Moravany received the name 'Venus' due to Upper Palaeolithic female figurines collectively being named "Venus figurines." This derives from the [[Roman mythology|Roman]] goddess of beauty, [[Venus (mythology)|Venus]]. The expression, "Venus", was first used in the mid-nineteenth century by the [[Paul Hurault, 8th Marquis de Vibraye|Marquis de Vibraye]], who discovered an ivory figurine and named it ''[[Vénus impudique|La Vénus impudique]]'' or ''Venus Impudica'' ("immodest Venus"). Despite considerable diversity in opinion amongst [[Archaeology|archeologists]] and in [[Paleoanthropology|paleoanthropological]] literature as to the function and significance of the figures,<ref>{{Cite web|last=Dixson|first=Alan F.|last2=Dixson|first2=Barnaby J.|date=2012-01-03|title=Venus Figurines of the European Paleolithic: Symbols of Fertility or Attractiveness?|url=https://www.hindawi.com/journals/janthro/2011/569120/|access-date=2021-04-08|website=Journal of Anthropology|language=en}}</ref>the name arises from the assumption that the figurines represent an ancient ideal of beauty. This perception is said to have derived from the fact that attention is directed to certain features common to most of the figurines. In particular, emotionally charged primary and secondary sexual characteristics, such as, the breasts, stomachs and buttocks.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Soffer, Adovasio, and Hyland|date=2000|title=The “Venus” Figurines, Textiles, Basketry, Gender, and Status in the Upper Paleolithic|url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/317381?journalCode=ca|journal=Current Anthropology|volume=41|pages=514}}</ref>However, somewhat ironically, the figurines majorly predate the mythological figure of [[Venus (mythology)|Venus]]. As a result, critics, such as Vandewettering, have highlighted that this could be a reflection of [[Androcentrism|Androcentric]] interpretations of the Venus figurines that, she suggests, were the starting point for archaeological understandings.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Vandewettering|first=Kaylea R.|date=2015|title=Upper Paleolithic Venus Figurines and Interpretations of Prehistoric Gender Representations|url=https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=pure|journal=PURE Insights|volume=4|via=Western Oregon University}}</ref> |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Revision as of 16:40, 7 May 2021
The Venus of Moravany[1] (Template:Lang-sk) is a small prehistoric female figurine discovered in Slovakia in the early 20th century.
It was ploughed up sometime before 1930 by the farmer Štefan Hulman-Petrech in Podkovica near the village of Moravany nad Váhom in Slovakia.
It is made of mammoth tusk ivory and is dated to 22,800 BCE,[citation needed] (the Gravettian).
A copy of this Venus currently resides in the Bratislava Castle exposition of the Slovak National Museum.[2]
Origin of the 'Venus' name
Goddess of Beauty
The Venus of Moravany received the name 'Venus' due to Upper Palaeolithic female figurines collectively being named "Venus figurines." This derives from the Roman goddess of beauty, Venus. The expression, "Venus", was first used in the mid-nineteenth century by the Marquis de Vibraye, who discovered an ivory figurine and named it La Vénus impudique or Venus Impudica ("immodest Venus"). Despite considerable diversity in opinion amongst archeologists and in paleoanthropological literature as to the function and significance of the figures,[3]the name arises from the assumption that the figurines represent an ancient ideal of beauty. This perception is said to have derived from the fact that attention is directed to certain features common to most of the figurines. In particular, emotionally charged primary and secondary sexual characteristics, such as, the breasts, stomachs and buttocks.[4]However, somewhat ironically, the figurines majorly predate the mythological figure of Venus. As a result, critics, such as Vandewettering, have highlighted that this could be a reflection of Androcentric interpretations of the Venus figurines that, she suggests, were the starting point for archaeological understandings.[5]
See also
References
- ^ Note: "Venus" is an umbrella term in archaeology for figurines of this type
- ^ A History of Slovakia: The Struggle for Survival by Stanislav J. Kirschbaum, p. 15
- ^ Dixson, Alan F.; Dixson, Barnaby J. (2012-01-03). "Venus Figurines of the European Paleolithic: Symbols of Fertility or Attractiveness?". Journal of Anthropology. Retrieved 2021-04-08.
- ^ Soffer, Adovasio, and Hyland (2000). "The "Venus" Figurines, Textiles, Basketry, Gender, and Status in the Upper Paleolithic". Current Anthropology. 41: 514.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Vandewettering, Kaylea R. (2015). "Upper Paleolithic Venus Figurines and Interpretations of Prehistoric Gender Representations". PURE Insights. 4 – via Western Oregon University.
.jpg){kind=link}
 | This sculpture article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
  | This article about Slovak history is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This article relating to archaeology in Europe is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |