Jump to content

User talk:John B123: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kobestarr (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 480: Line 480:


Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. [[User:FireflyBot|FireflyBot]] ([[User talk:FireflyBot|talk]]) 01:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. [[User:FireflyBot|FireflyBot]] ([[User talk:FireflyBot|talk]]) 01:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

== Request for the review [[Science in Sport]]==

Hi I'm not sure how to use this page so I apologise for errors

It is a company that has existed for many years it supports many Olympic athletes and teams yet the information is sparse. I wanted to create this page as i see smaller less well established companies being listed on here. They do a lot of work behind the scenes supporting diverstity in cycling and donating to cycling projects in Sierra Leone. Would love some help to steer this away from being seen as a promotional piece

https://cyclingindustry.news/science-in-sport-to-double-with-purchase-of-phd-nutrition/

[[User:Kobestarr|Kobestarr]] ([[User talk:Kobestarr|talk]]) 08:51, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:51, 4 June 2021

If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. Thank you. --John B123 (talk) 15:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Slingerland

Hello John B123 - just checking back in with you about Edward Slingerland. You suggested improved references. I have added references to all books. Was there more you think needed addressing? Thanks.

Hello again John B123. Just following up on this. I realized I hadn't signed the message or added a timestamp earlier. Sorry about that. Thank you. Alexanderwinfield3 (talk) 20:31, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Alexanderwinfield3, I must have missed your previous message, apologies for that. I've added some {{citation needed}} tags where you need to add references. (If any of the references already used would also verify the tagged content, it's perfectly ok to reuse them.) Regards. --John B123 (talk) 20:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Coulthart

Hi John B123. Thanks for your edit on Michael Coulthart in which you notice that the references are incomplete. Unfortunately, I am having terrible trouble with the citation bot from where I connect. It has been spotty all day. Can you please help by trying it out for me from where you are? Thanks in advance, Magnovvig (talk) 19:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Magnovvig, Citation bot isn't working for me either. I quite often have trouble with it. At times it runs automatically on the articles in multiple categories and during these times it just hangs if you try to use it. I've filled the references on Michael Coulthart with the RefToolbar, but it still might be worth running it through citation bot if you can catch it at a quiet time. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the update, John B123 and especially the drudgery to fill-in the refs manually. Cheers Magnovvig (talk) 19:39, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum, @John B123:: what do you think is causing the problems with citation bot? I've experienced this for around two weeks, if not longer. And how do we talk to someone in charge? Thanks in advance. Magnovvig (talk) 09:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Magnovvig, I think it's from a couple of users running long lists from the "Linked pages" option. User talk:Citation bot#Does anyone know what is going on here? might be of interest to you. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:47, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi John B123 thanks for your pointer to User talk:Citation bot#Does anyone know what is going on here? last month. Soon thereafter I noticed that the Bot was available again as someone had deleted the option to employ it for multiple pages at one go (which was being abused). And I'm somewhat surprised that this was the conclusion reached by others without my direct input. Anyhow, all's well that ends well. :) Magnovvig (talk) 17:50, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Magnovvig, it still seems a bit slow at times, but at least it's there. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello John B123 in the interim since my last communication with you on 9 May they seem to have reactivated the bulk "linked pages" option, and the citation bot is no longer useful. Grrrr. Magnovvig (talk) 04:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Kleff

Hi John, can you please review the draft Draft:Mario Kleff. It is supposed to be no draft :) I didn't notice it before it was released. Thank you Meow2021 (talk) 12:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Meow2021, I've moved it to mainspace. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you John. Now I can move on to the other articles. Greetings Meow2021 (talk) 15:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi John, I spent some time researching this article and shaping it into something better I think. For me, it's the second article of this style. Please check whether something is wrong and correct it if necessary. Thank you Meow2021 (talk) 06:29, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Meow2021, a small point, where you have two references together you shouldn't have a space between them. Otherwise, it's fine. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting. Thank you very much for this info and help. Regards Meow2021 (talk) 07:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why not a covid article for Kiribati?

Hello John B123, I do not really want to dispute a decision of a (very) more experimented contributor, but I do not agree with your decision of redirect COVID-19 pandemic in Kiribati page to the Kiribati's paragraph in COVID-19 pandemic in Oceania. All countries have their own covid page without exception, whatever the amount of informations. We have just to move informations contain in this paragraph to the COVID-19 pandemic in Kiribati, what do you think? Best regards, Sami270 (talk) 14:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sami270, I've got no objection for an article for Kiribati, but it needs to have more information in it than in the relevant part of COVID-19 pandemic in Oceania. Feel free to move information over if you want to. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:38, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good, I understand. I will rewrite the article with more informations. Thanks you and best regards. Sami270 (talk) 14:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sami270: That looks a lot better now, well done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, John B123. Have a nice day. Regards, Sami270 (talk) 08:07, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John B123 Sir, Please review the subject. Thanks and regards RV (talk) 17:22, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much and best regards RV (talk) 02:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)|}[reply]

Barnstar

The Reviewer Barnstar
Thank you so much for taking the time to review all 10 articles I published this week, plus some more in the past. You do a great service to Wikipedia! DanTickner (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks DanTickner, most kind of you. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:39, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mod Dam 1199 R

Hi John, I have noticed that you are a member of WikiProject Motorcycling. Could you take a look at Mod Dam 1199 R and rate. Thank you Meow2021 (talk) 05:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Meow2021, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much John! May I invite you to take a look at Mario Kleff too, as I believe you are advanced in reviewing articles and links. I think I did it right ... Meow2021 (talk) 10:04, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Meow2021, it looks fine to me. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 10:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi John. Thank you again <3 For future articles let me know if something is wrong. I'm still learning. Regards Meow2021 (talk) 10:56, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. Got a new article today. Submitting for your review. -Imcdc (talk) 06:01, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Imcdc. It would be good if you could find different sources for refs 1, 3 and 6. What a company says about itself and interviews with company personnel are generally not seen as reliable. Regards --John B123 (talk) 07:36, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi John. I have removed the 3 sources and replaced them. -Imcdc (talk) 10:18, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Imcdc, that looks fine now. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 10:33, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John B123 Sir, Please review the Silesia (cloth). Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 09:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, looks like somebody has already reviewed it. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 09:56, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks anyway! Warm regards RV (talk) 11:14, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barn star for you

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your magnificent contributions and tireless work. Hats off to a Wikipedian Star! RV (talk) 11:34, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks RV, most kind of you. Regards --John B123 (talk) 12:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John B123 Sir, Please review the subject. Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 14:40, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 15:01, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion/redirect

At the very least you could check whether what you're stating is actually true. I intended to update the article but didn't want to do it all in one go. I already explained on the talk page that Symmetry meets Wikipedia:NALBUMS so why claim it doesn't? Jules TH 16 (talk) 22:37, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jules TH 16 There was no indication on the page[1] that it met WP:NALBUM. As you were the one who changed the redirect to an article, the burden was on you the show notability on the page. --John B123 (talk) 23:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I already said that I left a message on the talk page? I swear, nobody reads talk pages. (Another editor undid a revision I made on an article and said I should take the subject matter up on the talk page, and obviously nobody ever reacted since.) Plus you undid the revision a mere two hours before I had finalized a new version. I never intended to leave the article in its pre-deletion state. Sometimes a little patience goes a long way. Jules TH 16 (talk) 19:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I'm afraid that when I was making the page for the Vaughans, I referred to the as The Vaughan family. Would you please help me remove the offending word. Other pages for prominent families, such as those of the Syphax family and the Quander family, do not use a the. It's been driving me nuts.

Thanks a lot. O.ominirabluejack (talk) 01:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi O.ominirabluejack, I've moved the page. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 06:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. Got another new article today. Submitting for your review. -Imcdc (talk) 14:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Imcdc, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick response -Imcdc (talk) 15:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the disambiguation page that I just created. Would you please review this one as well. Davidgoodheart (talk) 15:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Davidgoodheart, categories don't normally get reviewed, but it looks fine to me. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know this. Davidgoodheart (talk) 02:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. Got one more for today. Submitting for your review. -Imcdc (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Imcdc, all done. The article was previously deleted, but looking at the deletion discussion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RRE Ventures, your recreation should be safe from deletion under WP:G4. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John Sir, Please review the Parramatta cloth. Regards RV (talk) 03:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks RV (talk) 07:16, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Sir, Please review the subject page. Thanks and regards RV (talk) 10:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:27, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you and best regards RV (talk) 15:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. Got a new article today. Submitting for your review. I've noticed this one was deleted before. See if this time it is ok as I do not have access rights to see the deleted content. Thanks. -Imcdc (talk) 13:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Imcdc, I can't access deleted pages either, but a copy of the deleted page is available on the Internet Archive[2]. Putting aside the "Funds" and "Investments" sections, which do little to help establish notability, the deleted article is virtually unreferenced. Applying the same criteria to your article, there are three references. I'm not sure whether CrunchBase is looked on as reliable. It might be wise to add some more sources to the lead and Background sections. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi John. I've rewritten the lead and background parts while trying to keep them more neutral so to prevent the same issues from last time happening. I have removed the CrunchBase reference and added new ones to replace it. See if this works now. -Imcdc (talk) 17:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Imcdc, that looks better now. Regards --John B123 (talk) 16:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking the time to ensure this won't repeat the same mistakes. -Imcdc (talk) 16:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John Sir, Please review the Swansdown and Toilinet. Regards RV (talk) 04:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John Sir, Please review the Moisture management. Thanks and regards RV (talk) 07:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and regards RV (talk) 16:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Need to review 2 newly added articles

Hello Jhon sir, I have added 2 more articles here yesterday with proper sources. Please review both the pages Gubbare TV and Showbox Channel. (DreamTeamzz (talk) 11:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Hi DreamTeamzz, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir!!!

Just asking a question only for my curiosity, few days back I had added an article for Star Vijay Music with proper sources, but someone remove the article & made a redirect link with Star Vijay article. Why? Is it possible to restore the article here? Can u help me to recover the article? (DreamTeamzz (talk) 16:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Hi DreamTeamzz, the article was previously changed to a redirect following a deletion discussion.[3] Although the channel has now been launched, the references you gave just show that that it was launched, but don't show notability. I would suggest you leave it a while until there has been more coverage beyond the launch. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is requested to you, kindly restore the article, I will modify then as per ur telling.

One another request, kindly remove Star Kirano redirect link or delete it permanently, because within next 2 months, this new channel will be launched. If I remove redirect link & create the article, the article will be deleted soon.

That's why, u r requested to solve these 2 matters, i.e. Star Vijay Music - restore the article, and Star Kirano - remove the redirect link or delete it. Thank you. DreamTeamzz (talk) 02:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DreamTeamzz, as Star Vijay Music was previously deleted you need to re-create it through the WP:AfC process. Once Star Kirano has been launched and there are sufficient sources to show notability you can change the redirect to an article. I don't have the power to delete articles, you would need an admin for that. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:08, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created this Draft:Star Vijay Music. Kindly review the article and approve. DreamTeamzz (talk) 20:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamTeamzz: As per my previous comments, you need to show notability beyond the fact that it has now been launched. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 20:52, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, today I have added a article In10 Media here. Need to your review. Thanks!!! (DreamTeamzz (talk) 03:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Hi DreamTeamzz, it looks like the article has been deleted. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 05:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Silverlake Vineyard

Hello John, here is the new article Silverlake Vineyard. Could you help with categories and review? Many Thanks Meow2021 (talk) 13:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw it <3 Meow2021 (talk) 15:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Meow2021, how's things in Thailand, do you sill need to quarantine for 14 days on entry to the country? Still looking forward to getting back to Pattaya. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pattaya is great as always. In terms of quarantine, if you have a vaccine certificate, no. However, the number of those infected is increasing... All best. Meow2021 (talk) 16:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Meow2021, thanks for the info. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John Sir, Please review the Bayadere (fabric). Thanks and regards RV (talk) 16:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi John, did you spellcheck, or check for duplicate sentences? -Roxy . wooF 17:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Roxy, no I didn't. NPP is more about weeding out copyvios, unreferenced articles etc. I leave things like copyediting to those with better language skills than myself. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm. NPP must have a lower bar than I thought. Thx. -Roxy . wooF 18:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Roxy . Your daddy is a top reviewer. Better you take care of what you do. In case you forgot [[4]] and missed [[5]]. My piece of advice to you, please consider this training offer [[6]]. Wikipedia is about teamwork. Hence respect and avoid any conflict. Cheers!RV (talk) 04:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Back to work

Request for the review

Hello John, Sir, I hope you will not mind reviewing another page Duchesse. Thanks and regards RV (talk) 05:44, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, looks like somebody has beaten me to it. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is done. Thanks anyway and best regards. RV (talk) 16:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. Got one new article today on top of the other one thats still undergoing review. Submitting for your review. -Imcdc (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Imcdc, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick response -Imcdc (talk) 16:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. I have seen your recent edits to Wushu at the 1994 Asian Games – Women's taijiquan. Could you explain to me why you removed the results table? The Japan Wushu Federation link clearly displays the top-six in women's taijiquan as well as their scores. The Kyoto News source on LexisNexis though shows the full results for all ten competitors which is what I used to create the table. I understand it is not publicly visible, so if the information in the article could only be based on publicly visible resources, then I believe that the Japan Wushu Federation source with the top-six athletes and their scores should at least be included. Thank you. Yinglong999 (talk) 18:09, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yinglong999. The tables were unreferenced, only the opening sentence was referenced. If either or both of these references apply to the table then that needs to be shown on the page. It would be unreasonable to expect the reader to know how you sourced the tables. Whilst open-access sources are preferred, if they are not available then other sources are acceptable. This should be indicated in the citation using |url-access=registration or |url-access=subscription as appropriate. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi John B123 and thank you for the response. I usually do that because I figured it was a normal practice on Wikipedia, seeing how so many articles would include the main references in the single opening sentence and have no references in the medal table or results sections. What you said is contrary to what I have usually seen, but I understand your reasoning. I will be inserting the table back in but with an appropriate reference in that subsection. I must also add that Gao Jiamin is currently on the main page for DYK and there is a link on that page to this article, thus I feel it is best to reinsert the table at the time for the sake of interested readers. Thank you. Yinglong999 (talk) 03:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Yinglong999, thanks, that looks fine now. On a side note, we don't usually put references in headings as it can interfere with navigation so I've moved it to the table. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 05:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021-22 UCLA Bruins

Could you please look over the 2021-22 UCLA Bruins basketball page and tell me what else I need to add to it? I found a reliable source to back the schedule. Thanks. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GoWarriors151718. You need to reference that Mick Cronin is head coach and the team play at Pauley Pavilion. The reference you give for the schedule doesn't include where the away matches will be played. Ideally references should be from independent sources not the UCLA. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:46, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@John B123: I understand all that but I looked at the 2020-2021 UCLA Bruins men's basketball page and there are no extra references that show Mick Cronin as coach or Pauley Pavilion as the home arena for UCLA. In addition, there are no extra references for away games on any previous seasons of UCLA basketball, meaning what I did with regards to away games is exactly the same as what everyone else has done previously. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 22:06, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just noticed that you added a stub template to a list here. My understanding was that lists are generally not regarded as stubs. I was gonna be bold and remove them, but I already did it once before on the same page and was hesitant doing it again thinking I might be wrong. Could you clarify whether this can be regarded as stub? — Saadrafiq4 (talk) 18:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saadrafiq4, you're right, lists shouldn't have stub templates added, my mistake. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello John, Sir, Greetings of the day, Kindly review Cherryderry. Thanks and regards RV (talk) 04:20, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 05:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about article deletion

Hi John! I actually copied only introductory sentences from the article Mohenjodaro. And as for copying from the other source, as per my information Wikipedia articles need citations for their content, still If I rephrase the article, would it be spared from the deletion? Another thing is that there are some other articles on IVC artifacts too e.g. Dancing Girl so I created this article. Sorry if I did something wrong because I am quite new in the field of creating articles.Aglrochisat (talk) 10:27, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aglrochisat, it was the "Significance" section that was the problem, it appears to be copied from flickr.com/photos/umasha79/15796996425 - see the red highlighted text at [7]. If you rephrase it that will be fine. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 10:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John! Can you please visit the page Priest-king (sculpture) again and tell is it okay now? I tried to rephrase the significance article Aglrochisat (talk) 10:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aglrochisat, that looks ok now. I've added {{Copyvio-revdel}} to the page, which an admin will remove once they have hidden the previous versions of the page. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 11:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you John for your contribution. Stay blessed. Aglrochisat (talk) 11:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Two Articles

Hi John. Got two articles today. Submitting for your review. -Imcdc (talk) 07:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Imcdc, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 08:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the fast response. -Imcdc (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jobbik breakaway groups

Hello. I've seen the Civil Response's page, that you fixed it, thanks! The Jobbik have 3 breakaway groups, first party is the Our Homeland Movement (Mi Hazánk Mozgalom), second is the Volner Party (Volner Párt), and the third is the Civil Response (Polgári Válasz). These parties are splited from the Jobbik, because the Jobbik is joined to the left-wing opposition parties, you know the coalition parties, László Toroczkai is a radical right wing (Far-Right) politican, that he wanted to elect him as the president of the Jobbik, the Jobbik was originary the radical right wing party, which was founded in 2003, that was the far-right wing party, just like the MIÉP (Magyar Igazság és Élet Pártja), which that party was founded by István Csurka, who was in the MDF party (Magyar Demokrata Fórum). István Csurka founded his own political party, the MIÉP was founded in 1993, ten years later the Jobbik was founded in 2003, and the Our Homeland Movement is founded in 2018 June 23, and it is nearly 3 years now, and this party is going to the 2022 Hungarian parliamentary election, and the party's prime minister candidate is László Toroczkai. So, these 3 parties is splited from the Jobbik, because of the left-wing opposition coalition parties. That's all. If you need something, just contact me, and i can help everything! Have nice day! --TomFZ67 (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TomFZ67, thanks for the info. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 10:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@John B123: No problem, anytime! --TomFZ67 (talk) 11:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. One more for today. Submitting for your review. -Imcdc (talk) 17:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Imcdc, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:38, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks John -Imcdc (talk) 17:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for the review

Hello John, Sir, Please review Harateen. Thanks and regards RV (talk) 17:54, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you and best regards RV (talk) 01:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey what do I need to improve you mind giving me some pointers Arkcadis (talk) 19:46, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arkcadis, you need to reference the content of the article with citations from reliable, independent sources. Regard. --John B123 (talk) 19:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay..thanks Arkcadis (talk) 20:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

European Amateur Team Championship men's golf

Hi, I've completed every article on each of the European Amateur Team Championships (men's golf) 1959-2014. It would be of great value to have the completed articles reviewed, with a lot of facts and figures, easy to go wrong. Regards/EEJB EEJB (talk) 07:35, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EEJB, the articles have all been marked as reviewed, in that they meet the minimum standards for inclusion in WP. I know easy it is to make a mistake when transferring facts and figures, but as I know little about golf I'm probably not the best person to check. Perhaps you might want to post a request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Golf where those with more expertise will see it. Sorry I couldn't be of more help. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks EEJB (talk) 16:35, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Herman Tømmeraas

Hi John. I just updated the page for Herman Tømmeraas which you tagged as not meeting the notability guidelines. Can you please take a look at the changes and let me know. Thanks for your help and also do apologize if I have not placed this reply in the right place. Jackshere (talk) 13:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jackshere, I'm not sure he meets the requirements of WP:NACTOR?
  1. Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.
  2. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
  3. Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.
Regards. --John B123 (talk) 13:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @John B123 Thanks for the quick reply:
1) has roles in Netflick's Ragnarok, currently trending #1 (link here)
2) very large fan base (2.4 m) (did not want to sound promotional) on instagram
3) also in Skam, broke all records for NRK (link here)
4) from the page: (link here)
Norwegian youth series Semester was originally launched on its own site but has logged millions of views on Snapchat’s drama platform after being released earlier this month.
The series has had viewers in 180 countries worldwide and was previously sold to Scandi broadcasters NRK in Norway, DR in Denmark and Sweden’s TV4.
Moreover, the underground hit follows a teenager (Herman Tømmeraas, star of upcoming Norwegian Netflix original Ragnarok) who returns to Oslo after dropping out of school and skipping town to travel to Paris
Thanks for your help Jackshere (talk) 14:10, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jackshere, thanks for the info, I've removed the tag. You need to add a lead section to the article. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:22, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @John B123
Your help was much appreciated. I have added a lead section to the article. Thank you! Jackshere (talk) 15:00, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jackshere, no problem. I've marked the page as reviewed. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @John B123! That was a great experience!
Can you also help me with two other pages if possible at your convenience.
Jasmine Blackborrow
Zac Kara Jackshere (talk) 19:38, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jackshere, I've marked Jasmine Blackborow as reviewed, but tend to agree with the AfD comment of WP:TOOSOON for Zac Kara. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:45, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @John B123 Jackshere (talk) 01:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John, Sir, Kindly review the subject. Thanks and regards RV (talk) 14:24, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:33, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 14:35, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of freshly roasted coffee for you!

Thanks again! Jackshere (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jackshere, thanks, most kind of you. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page recreation after AFD

Hi there. You recently restored the redirect of P Nation after it was recreated due to the AFD resulting in deletion earlier this month. The user who recreated it, User:Hinorisakamachi, has since done the same again under the title of P-Nation. You seem to have a much better understanding of this area than I do so I hoped you could take a look at the edit history and their behaviour concerning the article as I'm not sure how to best proceed with this. Thanks, Alex (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alex, thanks for the heads-up. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:47, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Previously I had asked to move articles from draft: P Nation to main article, but this couldn't be moved because the link article "P Nation" was used to redirect to Psy. I do not know how, have repeatedly failed to link to the article "P Nation". That's why I gave an alternative to the P-Nation article link. In Korean or other language links also use the alternative name "P-Nation". Can you ask for his help so that it can be transferred to the P Nation link? Thank you very much. Hinorisakamachi (talk) 18:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Hinorisakamachi:, the article was deleted by consensus earlier this month, you cannot simply recreate it. --John B123 (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then what is the solution? it is impossible if the draft is left too long, even though I have researched and matched the references and links listed in the draft are correct. Thank you Hinorisakamachi (talk) 19:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Hinorisakamachi:, it was decided that P Nation was not notable enough to have a Wikipedia article, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P Nation. There is no "solution" for that. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Norton pics

Here are several of the 1973 team and transporter. If you click on the 'back' arrow to the previous sequence there's a rare shot of Peter sitting on the 1974 lattice frame. Also this sequence at Twitter rgds, --Rocknrollmancer (talk) 00:15, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rocknrollmancer, they're really interesting, thanks. --John B123 (talk) 07:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John, Sir, Please review the Bay (cloth). Thanks and regards RV (talk) 05:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much and best regards RV (talk) 07:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Article verification

Can you help me in getting this Draft Published. The subject is a Football coach from india. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Muzamil_Mahmood Dar zubair 07:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dar zubair. The notability requirements don't seem to be met. For coaches to be notable they need to be coaches for a club that plays in one of the leagues listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't Indian Women's League a notable league. Dar zubair 12:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dar zubair. I'm afraid not. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit

On the Welles Park page. Usually the first thing that happens after I try to add something is it gets deleted. Thanks for helping improve the page instead of speedy deleting it Gradvmedusa (talk) 18:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ruourni Kenshin (TV series)

Hello. The Rurouni Kenshin (TV series) content was moved from the Rurouni Kenshin article. I left a copied template on the talk page of the article for this move. By the way, it seems that this link just copied and pasted the content of the same Rurouni Kenshin article. - Xexerss (talk) 22:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xexerss, I've replied on you talk page (I think our messages crossed). Regards. --John B123 (talk) 22:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Defining Linkrot in an acceptable manner for all parties

Hi,

I saw that you included a linkrot warning in my new article. I looked up the link provided for linkrot and both its definition and plan of action in response to it leads me to believe that we might not be on the same page in terms of it. I am fully willing to concede that most of the misunderstanding could be on my end but of course to have a good dialogue we should both be open to learning new information and being open to being wrong. I wanted to issue you an invitation so that we can talk about it.

Thank you for taking the time to read this. Updatewithfacts (talk) 23:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Updatewithfacts. The references in the article just use a bare url, such as:
https://realitycircuit.com/2020/10/17/despite-mainstream-polling-there-is-reason-for-optimism-for-trump-voters/
If the website goes down then the reference doesn't really tell us much, whera if we use a {{cite}} template we will still have some details:
Thomas, Lee (2020-10-18). "Despite Mainstream Polling, there is Optimism for Trump Voters". Reality Circuit. Retrieved 3 June 2021.
Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to give a thank you in giving a respectful response. I have had some trouble doing proper citing (with regards to the template) and (being respectful to not name names) some editors have not been acting respectfully with regards to myself being a new editor and trying to understand the basics. I also appreciate that your response was not mean-spirited and for that I thank you very much. I was confused with regards to linkrot (and I still have some valid points with regards to how some other editors have interpreted linkrot) but the citation template does make a lot of sense and this will make it easier if I continue to be an editor in the future on how to properly show citations. Anyway, I wanted to pop in and thank you for your help. Whatever my future is with Wikipedia, I am glad you are one of a handful that has been extremely respectful :) Updatewithfacts (talk) 22:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John, Sir, I have placed the required template Db-g7. Please delete the subject. Thanks and regardsRV (talk) 02:07, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, I'm not an admin so don't have the power to delete pages. I see that it has been deleted now. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for the review

John, Sir, Kindly review the Uncu, Cumbi and Tocapu. Thanks RV (talk) 14:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:07, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
John, Sir, Cumbi and Tocapu do not have your tags, kindly see. Thanks RV (talk) 02:15, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
: Hi RV, I've marked them as reviewed but didn't add the {{stub}} tag as they are a bit longer than some of the other articles. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
:: John, Sir, Well noted. Please review Anaku (dress) and Anaku (disambiguation). Thanks and regards RV (talk) 07:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
I would love to send this start for you to be motivated more and more. Tima93Lb (talk) 21:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tima93Lb, thanks, that's most kind of you. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 21:06, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eigelstein (Cologne)

Information icon Hello, John B123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eigelstein (Cologne), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daughters of Galicia

Information icon Hello, John B123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daughters of Galicia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for the review Science in Sport

Hi I'm not sure how to use this page so I apologise for errors

It is a company that has existed for many years it supports many Olympic athletes and teams yet the information is sparse. I wanted to create this page as i see smaller less well established companies being listed on here. They do a lot of work behind the scenes supporting diverstity in cycling and donating to cycling projects in Sierra Leone. Would love some help to steer this away from being seen as a promotional piece

https://cyclingindustry.news/science-in-sport-to-double-with-purchase-of-phd-nutrition/

Kobestarr (talk) 08:51, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]