Jump to content

Talk:Custom House station: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
closing RM discussion; no consensus to move page
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Move|Custom House DLR station}}
{{WP London Transport}}
{{WP London Transport}}
== Requested move ==
== Requested move ==
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop -->
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''

{{{result|The result of the debate was}}} '''NO CONSENSUS''' to move page, per discussion below. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 22:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
<hr/>
[[Custom House station]] → [[Custom House DLR station]] — Served only by the [[Docklands Light Railway]], at least until Crossrail has opened [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] 16:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
[[Custom House station]] → [[Custom House DLR station]] — Served only by the [[Docklands Light Railway]], at least until Crossrail has opened [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] 16:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


Line 22: Line 26:


*Surely this should just be closed now as no concensus ? -- [[User:Beardo|Beardo]] 06:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
*Surely this should just be closed now as no concensus ? -- [[User:Beardo|Beardo]] 06:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom -->

Revision as of 22:58, 23 January 2007

WikiProject iconLondon Transport Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS to move page, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 22:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Custom House stationCustom House DLR station — Served only by the Docklands Light Railway, at least until Crossrail has opened Simply south 16:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Survey - Support votes

  1. Support - makes sense to me. ArtVandelay13 17:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - wikipedia should reflect reality and adopt the naming convention used for other DLR stations; historical context can be mentioned simply by introducing, The station opened in 1855, as Custom House Station ... with a redirect from the Custom House station. Kbthompson 11:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey - Oppose votes

  1. Oppose - the article also covers now closed stations on other lines. I see no need to move unless you plan separate articles for each with one central article - I don't see that as necessary. -- Beardo 17:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose - for same reasons as Beardo - Operational status changes should not affect WP naming, and if they do we have got our naming standards wrong. -- Chris j wood 17:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose - past and possible future lines justify simple station name --Henrygb 01:37, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.