User talk:Kobestarr

Speedy deletion of HobbySpace

A tag has been placed on HobbySpace, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Spryde 12:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chuma Nwokolo, Jr (December 22)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chuma Nwokolo, Jr.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TKK! bark with me! 16:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chuma Nwokolo, Jr concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chuma Nwokolo, Jr, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chuma Nwokolo, Jr concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chuma Nwokolo, Jr, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chuma Nwokolo, Jr concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chuma Nwokolo, Jr, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Science in Sport

Hello Kobestarr,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Science in Sport for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 18:22, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 15:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Kobestarr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I apologise for contravening the Wikipedia rules. I promise that I have never taken payment or even been asked by anyone to create Wikipedia articles. I hope that the infrequency of my article posting would support my statement and suggest that that is the case. Where I do see that I have made an ill-judged error is with the posting of a recent company Telcoin and then telling people, including those that work there, that I had created an article. I should not have done that. I apologise and will never do this again. I cannot stress enough that they didn't ask me to create this article and they would attest to that. I see that other articles I wrote have been removed. I didn't do any announcements on these articles and feel that my poor judgement, in this Telcoin case, has unfairly reflected on articles that are solid, have been added to by other editors and are used as a valuable research source on the Internet. I promise to contribute more to Wikimedia in the future as well as adding ad hoc articles. If I have misunderstood the reason for my ban please can you reach out to me to help me further understand? I once again stress that I have never received payment or other benefits from companies or people for creating Wikipedia articles on their behalf, and no one has ever asked me to create articles on their behalf. They have all been self motivated by myself and would love to be reinstated as an editor together with the articles that I am proud to have written. Thanks for reading. Kobi

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I apologise for contravening the Wikipedia rules. I promise that I have never taken payment or even been asked by anyone to create Wikipedia articles. I hope that the infrequency of my article posting would support my statement and suggest that that is the case. Where I do see that I have made an ill-judged error is with the posting of a recent company Telcoin and then telling people, including those that work there, that I had created an article. I should not have done that. I apologise and will never do this again. I cannot stress enough that they didn't ask me to create this article and they would attest to that. I see that other articles I wrote have been removed. I didn't do any announcements on these articles and feel that my poor judgement, in this Telcoin case, has unfairly reflected on articles that are solid, have been added to by other editors and are used as a valuable research source on the Internet. I promise to contribute more to Wikimedia in the future as well as adding ad hoc articles. If I have misunderstood the reason for my ban please can you reach out to me to help me further understand? I once again stress that I have never received payment or other benefits from companies or people for creating Wikipedia articles on their behalf, and no one has ever asked me to create articles on their behalf. They have all been self motivated by myself and would love to be reinstated as an editor together with the articles that I am proud to have written. Thanks for reading. Kobi |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologise for contravening the Wikipedia rules. I promise that I have never taken payment or even been asked by anyone to create Wikipedia articles. I hope that the infrequency of my article posting would support my statement and suggest that that is the case. Where I do see that I have made an ill-judged error is with the posting of a recent company Telcoin and then telling people, including those that work there, that I had created an article. I should not have done that. I apologise and will never do this again. I cannot stress enough that they didn't ask me to create this article and they would attest to that. I see that other articles I wrote have been removed. I didn't do any announcements on these articles and feel that my poor judgement, in this Telcoin case, has unfairly reflected on articles that are solid, have been added to by other editors and are used as a valuable research source on the Internet. I promise to contribute more to Wikimedia in the future as well as adding ad hoc articles. If I have misunderstood the reason for my ban please can you reach out to me to help me further understand? I once again stress that I have never received payment or other benefits from companies or people for creating Wikipedia articles on their behalf, and no one has ever asked me to create articles on their behalf. They have all been self motivated by myself and would love to be reinstated as an editor together with the articles that I am proud to have written. Thanks for reading. Kobi |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologise for contravening the Wikipedia rules. I promise that I have never taken payment or even been asked by anyone to create Wikipedia articles. I hope that the infrequency of my article posting would support my statement and suggest that that is the case. Where I do see that I have made an ill-judged error is with the posting of a recent company Telcoin and then telling people, including those that work there, that I had created an article. I should not have done that. I apologise and will never do this again. I cannot stress enough that they didn't ask me to create this article and they would attest to that. I see that other articles I wrote have been removed. I didn't do any announcements on these articles and feel that my poor judgement, in this Telcoin case, has unfairly reflected on articles that are solid, have been added to by other editors and are used as a valuable research source on the Internet. I promise to contribute more to Wikimedia in the future as well as adding ad hoc articles. If I have misunderstood the reason for my ban please can you reach out to me to help me further understand? I once again stress that I have never received payment or other benefits from companies or people for creating Wikipedia articles on their behalf, and no one has ever asked me to create articles on their behalf. They have all been self motivated by myself and would love to be reinstated as an editor together with the articles that I am proud to have written. Thanks for reading. Kobi |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}