Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick DiGiovanni: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:27, 30 June 2021

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Brascoian ^{(talk to me)} 07:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO no WP:SIGCOV that meets qualifications. Only really known for being a reality show contestant. SanAnMan (talk) 00:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SanAnMan (talk) 00:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. SanAnMan (talk) 00:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He has gained a lot of popularity from YouTube, having around 2.4M subscribers. If the YouTube part can be added to the article then it can be eligible. YashPratap 1912 (CONT.) 03:51, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@YashPratap1912: YouTube channel added. Brascoian ^{(talk to me)} 07:39, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep DiGiovanni i also ranked 6th in 2021 Forbes 30 Under 30 and i thinks that a big thing. and have 6.1 TikTok follower and also i didn't mentioned in the article that he also have 2.4million subscriber. Brascoian ^{(talk to me)} 04:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG with weak sourcing. KidAd • SPEAK 01:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was invited on my talk page. This looks like a maybe. It is not helped by poor sourcing, including youtube. It is WP:Reference bombed. I invite someone to nominate the WP:THREE best sources for careful analysis. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Added more Citation and upgraded Infobox. Brascoian ^{(talk to me)} 17:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Brascoian ^{(talk to me)} 16:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Weak sourcing and only seems to be known for the one thing. That being said I don't know what the rules are for social media influencers. FiddleheadLady (talk) 18:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Nick DiGiovanni]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''speedy keep'''. Nomination withdrawn. ([[Wikipedia:Non-admin closure|non-admin closure]]) [[User:Brascoian|<b><i><span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px darkgray;"><span style="color:#0000A0">Brascoian</span></span></i></b>]] [[User talk:Brascoian|<sup><i><span style="color:#228B22">'''(talk to me)'''</span></i></sup>]] 07:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
@@ Line 20: / Line 26: @@
 <small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Brascoian|<b><i><span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px darkgray;"><span style="color:#0000A0">Brascoian</span></span></i></b>]] [[User talk:Brascoian|<sup><i><span style="color:#228B22">'''(talk to me)'''</span></i></sup>]] 16:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Nick DiGiovanni]]</noinclude></div>
 *'''Weak Delete''' Weak sourcing and only seems to be known for the one thing. That being said I don't know what the rules are for social media influencers. [[User:FiddleheadLady|FiddleheadLady]] ([[User talk:FiddleheadLady|talk]]) 18:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>