User talk:Njd-de

hi

ur not even a real admin lmao 27.33.13.229 (talk) 12:18, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

And that's an issue because ..? – NJD-DE (talk) 12:20, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

it is an issue because how are you going to take away his editing privilege --Eater of the dark worlds (talk) 19:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Eater of the dark worlds, Admins are less special on WP than most people would think. The same rules apply to everyone here. Admins just have two or three more buttons. There are venues for non-admins to request admin intervention though. E.g. this resulted in the IP being blocked temporarily for their vandalism. – NJD-DE (talk) 19:18, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

i know i was just saying if you not admin then you can take away his pillage— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eater of the dark worlds (talk • contribs) 19:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Krisnapur,_Chakaria

Hi, I am a patroller, as per my knowledge, google Maps can be used as the Reliable source in this case, also as per RS list. Sonofstar (talk) 11:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Sonofstar, I see you have been preliminarily granted that user-right two days ago. You are right that there may be cases where Google Maps can be used. However the perennial sources list clearly also says that other reliable sources are preferred.

Different thing: I am a bit baffled why you added a link to a directory of bank branches, and a newspaper report that mentions a "Char Krishanapur" which is in an entirely different area of Bangladesh. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:22, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I agree for what you say but generally in case of villages I guess google map is good to use, because they don't have much covereage but regarding other sources I am fixing it, actually. Give me a moment.Sonofstar (talk) 11:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

My Homeland Egypt Party

I strongly objected to this by describing the amendments as promotion, but it is a correction of errors and updating data from an official documented source for the following reasons

First: Since these amendments are a correction of published errors, such as the date of the establishment of the party Second: There is an update of data, as the former party leader died and a new party leader was elected Third, these amendments are from the official website of the Egyptian government published on the parties, and there are no additions This is on the website of the Egyptian State Information Service affiliated to the Presidency of the Republic, which is the official state media organ Please publish this information so that Wikipedia does not continue to publish false data and data that is also irrelevant to reality Best Regards Dr. Mostafa Elsayed Sherbiny Secretary-General and Vice-President of My Country Egypt Party دكتور مصطفى الشربيني (talk) 12:39, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please publish this information, the party of Egypt is my country, which I extracted so that Wikipedia does not continue to publish false statements and statements that do not affect reality in it and are not promotion دكتور مصطفى الشربيني (talk) 12:39, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello دكتور_مصطفى_الشربيني, in your signature you mentioned you hold a leadership position in the party. This means you have a conflict of interest. Please familiarize yourself with the guideline and take appropriate steps in disclosing this COI. Furthermore, users with a COI are discouraged from editing the article directly. Instead please make use of the {{edit request}}-template or use the edit-request wizard.

However, edit requests need to be supported by reliable sources, and should not be promotional in tone. We are not looking for texts such as this one here The party has witnessed a new development in its orientations in terms of adopting youth issues, and it has been a pioneer in the work of political upbringing programs for youth since October 2020, placing this at the forefront of the major parties due to the willingness of leaders to join it, and it is expected that it will have a major role in Egyptian politics, especially in the elections for councils.. Regards, – NJD-DE (talk) 12:47, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Replies by دكتور_مصطفى_الشربيني

You are reviewing in a racist and impartial manner and you lack professional justice in deleting this article which is based on official data from the Egyptian government and we have never increased it in order to be promotional دكتور مصطفى الشربيني (talk) 22:28, 6 June 2021 (UTC) You are reviewing in a racist and impartial manner and you lack professional justice in deleting this article which is based on official data from the Egyptian government and we have never increased it in order to be promotional We hope to be more transparent and clear and stay away from racism It was better not to revise what you have amended and leave it to someone else Try to make peace with yourself and don't abuse your power It was the first thing to delete what you see as promotion and not to leave wrong data published about the Misr My Country Party, as well as old data. This is a bad image for Wikipedia that it publishes wrong data But racism overcame you in seeing the truth and correcting the error, based on what was published on the official Egyptian government media website. دكتور مصطفى الشربيني (talk) 22:28, 6 June 2021 (UTC) You are reviewing in a racist and impartial manner and you lack professional justice in deleting this article which is based on official data from the Egyptian government and we have never increased it in order to be promotional You are reviewing in a racist and impartial manner and you lack professional justice in deleting this article which is based on official data from the Egyptian government and we have never increased it in order to be promotional دكتور مصطفى الشربيني (talk) 22:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC) You are reviewing in a racist and impartial manner and you lack professional justice in deleting this article which is based on official data from the Egyptian government and we have never increased it in order to be promotional We hope to be more transparent and clear and stay Your racism overcame you in seeing the truth and correcting the error, based on what was published on the official Egyptian government media website. You are reviewing in a racist and impartial manner and you lack professional justice in deleting this article which is based on official data from the Egyptian government and we have never increased it in order to be promotional We hope to be more transparent and clear and stay away from racism It was better not to revise what you have amended and leave it to someone else Try to make peace with yourself and don't abuse your power It was the first thing to delete what you see as promotion and not to leave wrong data published about the Misr My Country Party, as well as old data. This is a bad image for Wikipedia that it publishes wrong data But racism overcame you in seeing the truth and correcting the error, based on what was published on the official Egyptian government media website. دكتور مصطفى الشربيني (talk) 22:30, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Beep

Hi! Thanks for your edits to Beep. I want to try and create a page for the site as it is a news organisation currently without one. We have broken significant stories in the North East of England and need a Wiki page. How can I do this? Thanks ! Nellevictorialauren (talk) 22:15, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Nellevictorialauren, I understand that you feel the need for having a Wikipedia article about your organization. However, your company must have already received significant coverage in independent and reliable sources to show that it meets the Wikipedia specific company notability guideline. After reviewing the paid editing policy and making the appropriate disclosures, you may then create a draft. Writing an article on Wikipedia can be a real challenge though. Especially when closely connected to the subject it might be frustrating, as Wikipedia is not interested in what you like to say about your company, but what others chose to say about it. In one simple phrase: Wikipedia is not the right place for PR. Hope this somewhat helps you, and please reach out to me again in case you have further questions. – NJD-DE (talk) 22:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

This is not PR either. Beep has been covered by significant organisations and referenced by them multiple times. It's also part of a well-known charitable organisation, so less of the 'not the place for PR' please. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nellevictorialauren (talk • contribs) 22:31, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

I didn't intend to say you want to use Wikipedia for PR. It's just rare to come across the 5% of people with pure intentions on writing an article about their organization. – NJD-DE (talk) 22:34, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Stop mass reporting people for ¨Vandalism¨ even if they did nothing.

This person basically doesn´t stop reporting anyone. People get warnings from them every five seconds. Some people deserve it, sure, but they have has reported people who have made amazing and thought provoking edits on articles. I dont think its responsible whatsoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:2E58:4210:3DD4:D237:C741:E50A (talk) 00:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Then explain, how were your edits helpful? I am curious and listening. – NJD-DE (talk) 00:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

How was my edit inappropriate?

How was my edit inappropriate? Please respond,

-Sincerely, DVD riot. DVD riot (talk) 02:19, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello DVD riot, it was not appropriate as there is no article for Muck (game), and you included a spammy external link. For further details please review WP:DAB and WP:EL. Thanks. – NJD-DE (talk) 08:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Dartz!

Thanks for sorting out the Dartz! page - I am not an advanced enough user to revert to the last correct page so you saved me a lot of work! Zuriel147 (talk) 19:17, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Zuriel147 for noticing that someone hijacked the article!! Happily chimed in there to help out, and also make sure that no one will mistake the one-by-one reverts with vandalism. If you ever come across an article (hopefully not Dartz! again :) ) and need help then let me know. – NJD-DE (talk) 19:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

POPinoy

Hello POPinoy was broadcasted in TV5 on Sunday please revert your edit again! Thank you see also this information : https://ppop.fandom.com/wiki/POPinoy thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepeneded (talk • contribs) 08:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Deepeneded, before redirecting to a new target please make sure that something in the target article is actually written there. Also fandom is not a reliable source, see WP:FANDOM. – NJD-DE (talk) 08:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes ,I know fandom isn't a reliable source but POPinoy was broadcasted in TV5 I'm from Philippines so I know, POPinoy is an survival show and searching new P-pop groups. The Show was announced last February 2021 and June 6 is the first broadcast and first special episode thank you! Mabuhay Deepeneded (talk) 08:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

External links on Trinity

Trinity page: The external link to https://religionfacts.com/christianity/beliefs/trinity.htm is a 404 page and https://www.hillsandvalleys.church/article/what-is-the-trinity would be a good replacement for it as a reference for people.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedee (talk • contribs) 21:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Pedee, external links should be kept to a minimum per the WP:EL-guideline. The article Trinity currently already has more than enough links. In case one of them is dead, it doesn't need replacement but could simply be removed. – NJD-DE (talk) 22:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of the update

Hey,

Can you specify the reason to revert the contribution? So, I can work upon it and improve. Surendrawat (talk) 17:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Surendrawat, Wikipedia is not a place for promotion. As advised by others on your talk page, per the Wikipedia Terms of Use it is mandatory that you disclose your employer, client, and affiliation. You may then request edits on the article's talk page for neutral content that is sourced with independent, reliable source. – NJD-DE (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

But, that's what I am explaining to everyone that I am not funded by anyone and these changes I am making based on my own knowledge and interest about the topic.

Can you specify the promotion in my last edit? Surendrawat (talk) 17:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Surendrawat, don't get me wrong, but seriously?

This is the reference you added: Singh, Surendra (2021-05-28). "Why Singapore's Construction Industry is in Urgent Need of AI-Enabled Automations?". viAct.ai. Retrieved 2021-06-13..

I don't doubt that the field interests you and that you have knowledge in it. But also it's very clear that you have a financial interest due to your employment. – NJD-DE (talk) 17:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Employment? Seriously?

What is the base of this accusation?

Rather then mentioning visit.ai if I'll go with Indus.ai, will you be saying the same? Surendrawat (talk) 18:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

No further comment needed from my side. Your recent edit drew an even picture about the connection between you and the company viact.ai. – NJD-DE (talk) 18:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

That picture was used for article created for the company.

And, how do you know I am there in that picture?

Completely baseless reverting of the contribution.

Let me approach legal proceeding for the same. Surendrawat (talk) 18:25, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Surendrawat, legal proceedings? – NJD-DE (talk) 18:30, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Macaulay Culkin page modification

I recently made a change on Macaulay Culkin page. Do you like to see the name Macaulay Culkin written "Macaulay Macaulay Culkin Culkin"?? Can you please change it to Macaulay Culkin??— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cezar teodosiu (talk • contribs) 16:12, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Cezar teodosiu, I do have a personal opinion on this as well, but this is not about whether we like the name like this or not. He had changed his name to this, and sources for this exist in the article. – NJD-DE (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

I've filed a sockpuppet investigation around the Mohamed Nemati editors, that you might be interested in: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mohamednemati. Best, and thanks for the help! Laplorfill (talk) 20:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Laplorfill! Had been thinking about doing that too, but am happy that Crazycomputers took care of them now based on our AIV report. – NJD-DE (talk) 20:50, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Data mining

Reply: Information icon Hello, I'm Njd-de. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. – NJD-DE (talk) 12:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Contributions added were all about scientific research that was very related to the contents of the article edited and they were both referenced and supported by published scientific articles. The contributions were neither promotional nor advertising. Scientific data mining and data mining process automation are major directions in the field and worth being added to the data mining page. In addition, the contribution added to CRISP-DM was also relevant, since the published process model is considered an extension and improvement to CRISP-DM. I am happy to revise my contributions if you have suggestions, but undo them all is not right. User:SingularityEye — Preceding unsigned comment added by SingularityEye (talk • contribs) 17:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello SingularityEye! The additions were improperly referenced, and with only a primary source they appear promotional. Edits by subject matter experts are appreciated. However, if you do have a conflict of interest or have any kind of financial interest in adding these references you will need to declare that. – NJD-DE (talk) 19:00, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind response and kind consideration. First, I would like to confirm that I have no conflict of interest and that I have no financial interests of any kind. The only objective for the modification is referring to recent trends and research directions in the field of data mining namely "scientific data mining" and "data mining process automation" which is very relevant to the edited topics. However, while I appreciate any help in correcting the citation style and refencing, I would like to confirm that the main reference is formally published as a refereed journal article by the prestigious publisher IEEE, while the other is published as a supporting document to the main article by arXiv which is also used widely used by all researchers. Thank you again, and I am happy to answer any further questions in this regard. SingularityEye (talk) 11:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

All the edits which I have are being reverted based on wrong accusations. Once by claiming that the modifications are motivated by financial interest and once by claiming that the cited reference is promotional. I would like to highlight the fact The cited reference is a refereed journal article that was published by IEEE as a pure reserach article without any financial or commercial interest. The published work was conducted as a research project that aimed to contribute data mining body of knowledge by improving and enhancing the data mining process in general and scientific data mining in particular. I am happy to discuss the matter with you in a pure scientific fashion, but I would like to kindly ask stopping reverting all the changes which I make to the article (SingularityEye (talk) 21:40, 1 July 2021 (UTC))

Hi SingularityEye, TooMuchSpam has left a good answer on your talk page on why this shouldn't be included in the article. The only thing I would like to add is that it seems you have a conflict of interest there, and would like to stree the point that Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Make a change

Hey I got your message... My query has been solved Thanks DEBAISH GHOSH MAJUMDAR (talk) 03:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello

Can you please help me to block user trofia65 this user only make vandalism Loveisthebest1 (talk) 10:33, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Loveisthebest1, I am not an admin so I can't block them. But you can report vandals at WP:AIV#User-reported, and then an admin will look into it. Please have a look at the instructions on that page, and then add your line in such a format at the end of the list: * {{vandal|Example user}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~. Hope this will help. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:19, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Looks like it was a mistake

Dear Njd-de, Could you please reconsider the content you removed from Mr Bill Inmon's page? Actually I am Ranjeet Srivastava and I am the Co-Author of those books into that discussion. So request you to resume those changes. It is marked as some 'spam' update or so. Please note that it is not spam or so, it is a genuine news about Bill Inmon's upcoming books in print. Please help us resume that very important information. You also removed information about its 60 books publication. Please don't do that and mark it as a safe change. You can reach me anytime for any clarifications. Regards, Ranjeet Srivastava (user - Toranjeet).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Toranjeet (talk • contribs) 19:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Toranjeet, I suppose you weren't logged in when you made the edit. Anyways, I reverted the edit as a lot of external links were added that per the community guidelines are not supposed to be part of articles (e.g. links to LinkedIn accounts, Amazon,..). You appear to have a financial interest in your edits here, so please familiarize yourself with the policy WP:PAID and take the appropriate actions mentioned there. Also, editors with a conflict of interest are strongly discouraged from editing articles directly. Instead please requests edits on the article#s talk page using the {{edit request}} template, or the edit request wizard. Thanks! – NJD-DE (talk) 19:52, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

NJD-DE, thanks for being the middle man here. Toranjeet, we don't do announcements, unless they are so important that secondary sources report on them. The Inmon article suffers from a whole lot of promotionalism. A user named User:DanielkHartness added a whole bunch of Amazon links, and your addition is also not encyclopedic since it's unverified and, after all, we are an encyclopedia, not a site for resumes or announcements. Now, as a co-author you have a conflict of interest; please follow the guidelines in the template that I just put on your talk page. Thank you. Njd-de, thanks again. Drmies (talk) 21:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing things up for everyone Toranjeet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎DanielkHartness (talk • contribs) 20:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Tali Fahradian Weinstein

Hi, I just tried to edit this page but the edit was removed because of a lack of citations.

As things stand now, the page is extremely and deliberately misleading. It all but states that the Fahradian family fled TO the USA to avoid persecution (in Iran) but deliberately omits that the family was in Israel for almost a year before coming to the USA--under false pretences as I indicated.

There is no mention that the family, including Tania, was here illegally and received amnesty, and were NOT fleeing persecution because Israel is the eternal home of the Jewish people. Jews don't flee Israel to avoid persecution.

As the website is now, it is deliberately misleading, arguably factually incorrect, and at best, EXTREMELY nuanced to give a false impression. How can this be corrected?

Mgbrautigam (talk) 11:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Mgbrautigam, do you have any reliable sources to corroborate this? You mentioned concerns about giving a false impression. Please have a look also at WP:NPOV, as your edit wasn't quite neutral either.– NJD-DE (talk) 11:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

About the Revertion of Editing Proof of Space Page

Dear Njd-de: I suggest not to use (PoS) as abbreviation of Proof of Space. Ateniese et al. (2014) primarily used PoS as abbreviation of Proof of Space. However, PoS is also the abbreviation of Proof of Stake, and is more common in use. You can check this reference, it is also included in the Proof of Space Wiki https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328160285_Survey_of_Consensus_Protocols/link/5e536218a6fdcc2f8f5d780c/download — Preceding unsigned comment added by SBCSignum (talk • contribs) 13:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi SBCSignum. Your username and edits indicate that you have a conflict of interest (COI). That's why I reverted your edits. As a COI-editor (paid or not paid), please suggest your edits on article talk pages using the {{edit request}}-template, instead of editing articles directly. You can find more about the relevant policies and guidelines here: WP:PAID and WP:COI. Thanks. – NJD-DE (talk) 13:47, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Reverting to old version of Diet for a Small Planet wiki page?

Hello, You seemed to have reverted this book page to an older version just now. I am sorry if I didn't do something right when updating the Diet for a Small Planet Wikipedia page. But I actually work for the author, Frances Moore Lappe, and all the text was written by Frances and the images are hers with permission. How do fix anything I did wrong and then can I revert back to the updated version? I am so sorry if I messed up something. I was making a lot of edits today. First to change all the hyperlinks to citations and then to try to get the formatting of the images and subheading to align correctly. Please help, I really need to get this Wikipedia page updated for Frances, the author, because the 50th anniversary edition is being released on Sept. 21st.

Thank you, Heather Packard Managing Director at Small Planet Institute heather@smallplanet.org— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluewatergreenmountains (talk • contribs) 21:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Bluewatergreenmountains, thanks for reaching out to me. I can understand you feel the need to get this article updated, however Wikipedia is not a place for promotion, and we are not in a particular rush here. Please have a look on your talk page where I left you a message regarding paid editing. After reading the WP:PAID-policy, and taking appropriate acitons, it will be best if you make edit-requests on the article talk page. You can do so by either using the {{edit request}}-template, or simply use the edit request wizard. It makes it easier for everyone though if you split your edit requests into separate requests. Also they should adhere to our manual of style (e.g. the font shouldn't be large) and everything needs to be verifiable with reliable sources (preferentially sources not by the subject of the article). If you have any questions, then let me know. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Reply back

Hi Njd-de, I am not paid for anything. I am an honest contributor of Wikipedia contributing and improving Wikipedia data because there are many topics which has wrong information. Yes in last few days I was editing AGW Bharat because it is a new brand in India in media news organisation.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiara Comms (talk • contribs) 07:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Kiara Comms, ok understood. However, your edits would indicate otherwise. It appears you are only here to promote AGW Bharat, Naveen Prasad and Privesh Pandey. Please note that Wikipedia is not a place for promotion, and in case you do have a conflict of interest (paid or not paid doesn't matter) you definitely need to disclose this. – NJD-DE (talk) 09:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

But Njd-de I don't know them then how can I promote them. I just say these data from LinkedIn & many other sources are doing good in the Journalism field. And I used to add because there are many articles on them. Then only I add them. I add only credible names links.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiara Comms (talk • contribs) 09:58, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Alright Kiara Comms. This is not how Wikipedia works though. Only those organizations or people who meet Wikipedia's standard of notability can have their own article, and only these should be included in such lists. Them appearing on LinkedIn is clearly not enough to establish notability. We need significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. LinkedIn is not one of these. – NJD-DE (talk) 10:01, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Dead link on Krishna Bharat

Thanks Njd-de — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krantikari azad (talk • contribs) 11:16, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Krantikari azad for noticing the dead link and finding an archive link. You can have a look at my edit to see what I did in order to include the archive link in the reference. In case you have any questions, let me know. – NJD-DE (talk) 12:35, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Seen you a few times over at AIV, so wanted to thank you for your assistance! Patient Zerotalk 22:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

reversal theory

I do not have a financial stake in reversal theory - there is no money to be made from my position. I am a university student who appreciates the theory. My most recent edits are because I attended the recent online conference. I am in no way violating wikipedia's policies by editing this page. 138.47.128.67 (talk) 18:32, 1 July 2021 (UTC)PsycMJ

Hi, I noticed you left the same message at User talk:PsycMJ, so I have replied there. – NJD-DE (talk) 19:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Thomas Fellows - admission of conflict of interest

Hi,

I’d like to acknowledge that I have a conflict of interest when it comes to Fellows. I’m his publicist. I have knowledge that his most recent book is going to get more media attention in the coming weeks and months.

With your permission, can I feed you articles and you put them on his page as you see fit?

Thanks and I apologize for not admitting this sooner. Makepeace222 (talk) 20:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello Makepeace222, thanks for reaching out to me. One important thing I wanna begin with is that WP is not a place for promotion, and even though articles cover a subject, the subject doesn't own the article. With that being said please familiarize yourself with the policy on paid editing. You can then make edit requests using the {{edit request}} template on the article's talk page, or make use of the edit request wizard. Other editors (incl. me) will notice these requests and include these changes in an article if they are in line with the WP policies and guidelines (e.g. not promotional, sourced with reliable sources, relevant to the article ..).

One last question though: Is this your first/only account or have you been editing under a different username in the past? – NJD-DE (talk) 20:58, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

I have been using different usernames in the past. I was the first one to originate his page two years ago. I understand that it is not for promotion. I was not aware of the the paid editing. Again, I am sorry for delegitimizating Wikipedia with my actions.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Makepeace222 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

udbhavsirvastav WP:PE can you help me edit my draft

hey so i am new to wikipedia and i am trying to create this article but having so much difficulties creating it because there is so less information available online so i was thinking it will be so much easier if there is someone like you to guide me can you help Udbhavsirvastav (talk) 21:29, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Udbhavsirvastav, I can understand Wikipedia can be confusing in the first days. Your edits imply you are not entirely new to this though, and not entirely new to our policies. But anyway...

If you have specific questions regarding policies then I will be happy to direct you in the right direction. However, there is an important thing: The vast majority of us are here voluntarily and the only compensation we receive is the nice feeling of achievement, positive feedback from other users, and maybe a barnstar from time to time.

In comparison to that, you receive payments from a client for your contributions as you disclosed on your user page (and it was good to disclose that). But that also means if you need help writing the draft, then don't expect others to e.g. do the research for references. That is part of the job your client hired you for.. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

One more thing I must confess when it comes to editing Thomas Fellows' page

Hi,

I wanted to bring one other thing to your attention that I did wrong. All the edits I made were clearly sourced, although I admit, some were promotional. There was one edit, however, that was clearly misleading. That edit was the one about Tiger Woods. It is true that he is in Fellows’ book, and there was an article in the “Augusta Chronicle” stating this, but I went overboard in saying that the article claimed to have said that Woods has become a better person as a result of the suffering. The article never stated that.

Considering my client has benefited from Wikipedia in his own research in his own books, for me to to do something that egregious is the highest form of betrayal. I am truly sorry for my actions.