User talk:Makepeace222

This is Makepeace222's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forget Self-Help (book) (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Forget Self-Help:Re-examining the Golden Rule, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Forget Self-Help (book) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Forget Self-Help (book), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 14:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Makepeace222! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 14:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Thomas Fellows (author) for COI editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 00:18, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may edit the talk page and post any edit requests there. I encourage you to learn what Wikipedia is, and how it works, especially for editors with a COI|conflict of interest. Speaking of which, please follow the instructions in WP:DISCLOSE. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:19, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Drmies (talk) 14:50, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Makepease, when I wrote "please follow the instructions in WP:DISCLOSE", which part of that did you not understand? Drmies (talk) 14:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosing Conflict of Interest (I am Fellows' PR rep)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Makepeace222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I am requesting to be unblocked. I admit to being Fellows' PR rep. If unblocked, when I do make edits, I will make sure they are not promotional in nature and make sure the sources that I use are reliable. Makepeace222 (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request does not convince me that you understand how to contribute with a conflict of interest, and/or that you want to edit in areas unrelated to your conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 13:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Understood. I will put in the

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

when making edits to alert editors that I have made a change that involves a conflict of interest, and I pledge to edit 5 articles biweekly from here on out.

Makepeace222 (talk) 17:11, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: You're blocked and that's final. Quetstar (talk) 18:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 02:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]