User talk:WimpyDood: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
BaxçeyêReş (talk | contribs) Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
I just noticed [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bax%C3%A7ey%C3%AARe%C5%9F&oldid=1035136095 this edit] right here. Mind explaining what you mean by "just bizarre"? |
I just noticed [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bax%C3%A7ey%C3%AARe%C5%9F&oldid=1035136095 this edit] right here. Mind explaining what you mean by "just bizarre"? |
||
Creffel, you have continuously edited Wikipedia articles to fit the point of view of the highly authoritarian and revisionist government. I believe this constitutes a valid reason to report you to ANI per [[WP:NPA]] and [[WP:CIVIL]]. I am currently reading the guidelines to determine the best course of action. |
Creffel, you have continuously edited Wikipedia articles to fit the point of view of the highly authoritarian and revisionist government of Azerbaijan. I believe this constitutes a valid reason to report you to ANI per [[WP:NPA]] and [[WP:CIVIL]]. I am currently reading the guidelines to determine the best course of action. |
||
Enough with the apologetic attitudes towards vandalism, threatening and POV-pushing. No need to explain yourself, Creffel, you'll get that chance at ANI shortly. [[User:BaxçeyêReş|BaxçeyêReş]] ([[User talk:BaxçeyêReş|talk]]) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) |
Enough with the apologetic attitudes towards vandalism, threatening and POV-pushing. No need to explain yourself, Creffel, you'll get that chance at ANI shortly. [[User:BaxçeyêReş|BaxçeyêReş]] ([[User talk:BaxçeyêReş|talk]]) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:30, 23 July 2021
WimpyDood, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi WimpyDood! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC) |
Removing uncited material
Hi Wimpy Dood, I see your recent edits include removal of several uncited sections and phrases. Maybe it would be better to just add a Citation needed tag? And also, if you are already active in a particular region, maybe also look for a source before just removing it? The phrase on the Autonomy Accord for Kurds in Iraq should be easy to adapt and source. There exists the article Iraqi–Kurdish Autonomy Agreement of 1970. For other phrases Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Paradise Chronicle. Much of the information I removed has gone uncited for years, so I was thinking that removal makes more sense. Although I do agree, perhaps I should place more tags. I will look more into the article and try to add information from sources later. If you strongly object to any of the removals in particular please let me know. - WimpyDood (talk) 08:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Extremely concerning statement
I just noticed this edit right here. Mind explaining what you mean by "just bizarre"?
Creffel, you have continuously edited Wikipedia articles to fit the point of view of the highly authoritarian and revisionist government of Azerbaijan. I believe this constitutes a valid reason to report you to ANI per WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. I am currently reading the guidelines to determine the best course of action.
Enough with the apologetic attitudes towards vandalism, threatening and POV-pushing. No need to explain yourself, Creffel, you'll get that chance at ANI shortly. BaxçeyêReş (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- I mean... if you want to suddenly report me in response to my intention to consider reporting then, ok? I personally think that this just proves that you're not a responsible editor. - WimpyDood (talk) 22:28, 23 July 2021 (UTC)