Template:Did you know nominations/Permanent income hypothesis: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
BasedMises (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
::That could work. It's a primary source but the Nobel Foundation is reliable for information about the Nobel Prize. It could be used in combination with the original source you provided. There is one issue {{ping|BasedMises}} the fact in the article it also has to be cited. The article cites Worek's offline book, so I'm assuming the book says that. If it doesn't we have to fix that. Otherwise we can (and probably should) use the citation from the article in the hook to keep it consistent. [[User:BuySomeApples|BuySomeApples]] ([[User talk:BuySomeApples|talk]]) 04:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC) |
::That could work. It's a primary source but the Nobel Foundation is reliable for information about the Nobel Prize. It could be used in combination with the original source you provided. There is one issue {{ping|BasedMises}} the fact in the article it also has to be cited. The article cites Worek's offline book, so I'm assuming the book says that. If it doesn't we have to fix that. Otherwise we can (and probably should) use the citation from the article in the hook to keep it consistent. [[User:BuySomeApples|BuySomeApples]] ([[User talk:BuySomeApples|talk]]) 04:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC) |
||
::* Pinging {{ping|BasedMises}} it's been over a week and I wasn't sure if you saw the last comment. This nom needs just a little more work on the sources to get it up to spec. [[User:BuySomeApples|BuySomeApples]] ([[User talk:BuySomeApples|talk]]) 05:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC) |
::* Pinging {{ping|BasedMises}} it's been over a week and I wasn't sure if you saw the last comment. This nom needs just a little more work on the sources to get it up to spec. [[User:BuySomeApples|BuySomeApples]] ([[User talk:BuySomeApples|talk]]) 05:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
:::Sorry. I kind of forgot about this. I think I'll add the Nobel source to the article.[[User:BasedMises|<span style="font-family:cambria;color:Blue;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px Gray;">BasedMises</span>]]<sub>[[User talk:BasedMises|<span style="font-family:cambria;color:Gray;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px Gray;">Mont Pelerin</span>]]</sub> 05:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:*Dull hook. Does ''anyone'' who wins the economics Nobel win for just one thing they did? No. And really, the hook should be something about the subject of the article, not the person who created that subject. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 04:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC) |
:*Dull hook. Does ''anyone'' who wins the economics Nobel win for just one thing they did? No. And really, the hook should be something about the subject of the article, not the person who created that subject. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 04:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 05:49, 4 August 2021
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Permanent income hypothesis
- ... that Milton Friedman won his Nobel Prize for numerous contributions to economics, such as his permanent income hypothesis? Source: Forder, James; Monnery, Hugo (2019). "Why Did Milton Friedman Win the Nobel Prize? A Consideration of His Early Work on Stabilization Policy". Economic Journal Watch. Fraser Institute. 16 (1): 130–145.
- ALT1... that Milton Friedman's permanent income hypothesis helped to earn him a Nobel Prize? Source: see above
Improved to Good Article status by BasedMises (talk). Self-nominated at 23:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- No - Interesting:
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
Article is new enough, long enough and well sourced. No issues with neutrality or copyvio. The hook's interest seems fine to me but I rephrased it as ALT1 to address Daniel Case's concerns. One problem: the source cited in the hook does not seem to mention the "permanent income hypothesis" specifically. It definitely alludes to it, but I'd think a more precise source would be better. If that got added I would be ready to approve. BuySomeApples (talk) 08:31, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Does this work? BasedMisesMont Pelerin 01:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- That could work. It's a primary source but the Nobel Foundation is reliable for information about the Nobel Prize. It could be used in combination with the original source you provided. There is one issue @BasedMises: the fact in the article it also has to be cited. The article cites Worek's offline book, so I'm assuming the book says that. If it doesn't we have to fix that. Otherwise we can (and probably should) use the citation from the article in the hook to keep it consistent. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging @BasedMises: it's been over a week and I wasn't sure if you saw the last comment. This nom needs just a little more work on the sources to get it up to spec. BuySomeApples (talk) 05:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry. I kind of forgot about this. I think I'll add the Nobel source to the article.BasedMisesMont Pelerin 05:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Dull hook. Does anyone who wins the economics Nobel win for just one thing they did? No. And really, the hook should be something about the subject of the article, not the person who created that subject. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- That could work. It's a primary source but the Nobel Foundation is reliable for information about the Nobel Prize. It could be used in combination with the original source you provided. There is one issue @BasedMises: the fact in the article it also has to be cited. The article cites Worek's offline book, so I'm assuming the book says that. If it doesn't we have to fix that. Otherwise we can (and probably should) use the citation from the article in the hook to keep it consistent. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)