Talk:Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:40, 30 September 2021

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Port of Call New Orleans

IMDb reports this subtitle for the remake, but we need to verify this with a reliable source. If we can, we can move the remake to the (currently redirected) Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans and Bad Lieutenant (1992 film) back to Bad Lieutenant. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The onscreen title is actually 'The Bad Lieutenant'. I think there's a colon in the subtitle after 'Call'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.168.45.250 (talk) 17:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is correct. I was specifically paying attention for this during the opening title sequence, and it appeared as follows:

     The Bad Lieutenant
     Port of Call: New Orleans

However, I do believe that most of the marketing material and press have been referring to the film as Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans. –Fierce Beaver (talk) 18:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Six years later, IMDb reports "Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans" as both USA and world-wide English title, while the version with the article is listed only as "USA (promotional title)" Kumagoro-42 18:15, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Sequel or remake?

The first section of this article states that it is a sequel to Bad Lieutenant (1992 film) while the production section states that it is a remake. It seems unlikely that this is a sequel but Herzog has stated that it isn't a remake. Can anyone verify? 75.111.221.153 (talk) 18:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Werner Herzog said this is NOT a remake. Someone please be kind enough to remove the remake references in the article. Herzog said in an interview that he hasn't even heard of or seen the 1992 version. Just a coincidence of title. Lhw1 (talk) 19:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And you believe him? Herzog said that only to upset Ferrara. He saw all the Harmony Korine movies... it's quite unlike he didn't see the original

It wouldn't be the first director to completely ignore the 'source' material. Frankly, it seems more likely that he's trying to distance the movie from the 'original' than piss Ferrerra off, which is consistent with his desire to change the title. 96.251.63.254 (talk) 09:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, he said he'd never heard of Ferrara, what a crook, the name bad lieutenant just appeared to him in a german sausage. 01:56, 30 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.25.153 (talk)

I believe that the latest interview to the Telegraph solves this issue. Unless someone is comfortable with developing and applying a "quantitative" definition of sequel and/or remake, the classification of the movie should be according the director's statements. Therefore, references to remake or sequel should not be present in the article.Ilidio Martins (talk) 12:09, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I wonder whether folks who are making any sort of comparison at all have seen both films. They are utterly, totally, different. Abel Ferrara's film is a spiralling rollercoaster ride to hell, whereas Herzog's is a nodding and winking goof on the police thriller genre. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 15:57, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree.

- I'd somehow think, they'd love each others films. Maybe they should just go have a beer together. 85.216.117.19 (talk) 08:16, 9 May 2013 (UTC) It was a remake alright.. a Nick Cage remake of Heath Ledgers Joker character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.116.55 (talk) 02:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Werner Herzog was brought in late as directer, or at least did not originate the concept of this film http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/features/45673-exclusive-the-bad-lieutenant-is-not-a-remake. This is not 'his' film. I think someone needs to find out why this was called "Bad Lieutenant" in the first place. It is likely the producer/s - or whoever owned the rights to the name - but it needs research. Herzog was quoted as saying he tried to get them to change the name, to no avail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.202.24.164 (talk) 18:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090906225353/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/content_display/world/news/e3iebcb76ce49180e2de218f144e1e81627 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/world/news/e3iebcb76ce49180e2de218f144e1e81627

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i5d0ba91ef6cd18f2448550f720aa6a9c
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090922184151/http://blogs.suntimes.com:80/ebert/2009/09/tiff_7_it_was_a_very_good_day.html to http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/09/tiff_7_it_was_a_very_good_day.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 :::I believe that the [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/7733029/Bad-Lieutenant-terrific-film-but-what-about-the-title.html latest interview] to the Telegraph solves this issue. Unless someone is comfortable with developing and applying a "quantitative" definition of sequel and/or remake, the classification of the movie should be according the director's statements. Therefore, references to remake or sequel should not be present in the article.[[User:Ilidio.martins|Ilidio Martins]] ([[User talk:Ilidio.martins|talk]]) 12:09, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 ::::And I wonder whether folks who are making any sort of comparison at all have seen both films. They are utterly, totally, different. Abel Ferrara's film is a spiralling rollercoaster ride to hell, whereas Herzog's is a nodding and winking goof on the police thriller genre.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/131.215.115.31|131.215.115.31]] ([[User talk:131.215.115.31|talk]]) 15:57, 26 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+:::::Agree.
 - I'd somehow think, they'd love each others films. Maybe they should just go have a beer together. [[Special:Contributions/85.216.117.19|85.216.117.19]] ([[User talk:85.216.117.19|talk]]) 08:16, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 It was a remake alright.. a Nick Cage remake of Heath Ledgers Joker character.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.207.116.55|98.207.116.55]] ([[User talk:98.207.116.55|talk]]) 02:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->