User talk:Chesdovi

Mass changes at Israeli settlement articles

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

hello

Hello, Chesdovi. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Good Article promotion

	Congratulations!
	Thanks for all the work you did in making Tefillin a certified "Good Article"! Your work is much appreciated. All the best, – Quadell (talk)

Notification

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Chesdovi_and_Palestinian_edits regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Chesdovi! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Notes

Balady citron, New Jewish Cemetery, Kraków, Moshe Zvi Segal, Abraham Sternhartz, Eliyahu Chaim Rosen, Shlomo Yosef Zevin

Warring on Elazar Shach

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Elazar Shach. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. -- Winchester2313 (talk) 16:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

This is a false accusation. Chesdovi (talk) 22:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shaar Hashamayim Yeshiva

The article Shaar Hashamayim Yeshiva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yaakovaryeh (talk) 10:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Jonatan Meir's book? Chesdovi (talk) 14:11, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your request to amend your tban

Just recording the conversation here so we have a record in your talk page history of the advice given. This will make reviewing your restrictions easier. Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

• re your comment You don’t get to decide if a block was legitimate or not. It was levied, not overturned, no consensus it was wrong so its legitimate. Therefore your request to vary your tbans is premature. Don’t agree? You can appeal to AE or AN but I suspect its likely to backfire if you do it. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
  • All I wanted to know was if adding that DBG ate pork constituted a T-BAN violation as I was clearly advised that doing so would not be, yet along comes another Admin and slaps on a block without asking me to explain my edits viz-a-viz the T-BAN. Fascinating how one Admin can refuse to accept the decisions of other Admins who had advised back in 2016 what constituted my TBAN and is then supported for sanctioning me for editing in accordance with my T-BAN. Good night. Chesdovi (talk) 00:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)