Jump to content

Talk:Cardiac arrest: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Cardiac arrest/Archive 1) (bot
Line 67: Line 67:


This clearly isn't right. I've suffered two hard episodes of first atrial fibrillation, then ventricular tachycardia, and finally outright starting ventricular fibrillation. There was never any threat of death, even if normal heart function had to be restored by synchronized electrical cardioversion. Twice. It's asystole which counts as real death, to be resuscitated from, not vtach or even vfib. *And* it says so in the extant sources of the article, already. [[User:Decoy|Decoy]] ([[User talk:Decoy|talk]])̃~
This clearly isn't right. I've suffered two hard episodes of first atrial fibrillation, then ventricular tachycardia, and finally outright starting ventricular fibrillation. There was never any threat of death, even if normal heart function had to be restored by synchronized electrical cardioversion. Twice. It's asystole which counts as real death, to be resuscitated from, not vtach or even vfib. *And* it says so in the extant sources of the article, already. [[User:Decoy|Decoy]] ([[User talk:Decoy|talk]])̃~

== " Invariably fatal"? ==

Yes, it is (almost?) universally fatal if not treated immediately, but this particular wording makes it seem absolute. Decapitation is something which qualifies for that qualification, this one... really doesn't. --[[Special:Contributions/181.115.61.74|181.115.61.74]] ([[User talk:181.115.61.74|talk]]) 04:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:35, 16 October 2021

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconPhysiology C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.
WikiProject iconMedicine: Cardiology C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Top-importance).

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JSShin (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Lindseyshehee.

cardiac embarrassment

Dear sir/madam, I am searching the topic 'cardiac embarrassment',which is connected to something like mediastinal shifting after a pulmonary surgery.I have searched many sites but could not get the topic in detail & in a better manner.It seems the topic is not an highlighted one,but my curiosity for this search topic is increasing.I would like you to include this topic on your site,as your site shows detailed and thorough information about any topic. Kindly do look into this matter.Looking forward to see this topic on your site. Thanking you in anticipation. Yours truly, site member.

Pijkuoi

Peer Review

Great job on this article. This was an interesting read for me as I was seeing what changes you made to the article. From your original work plan, this is what I thought you did well and what you might want to add.

Introduction: I would explain what coronary artery disease, ventricular fibrillation, and a shockable rhythm (v tach and vfib) means Good work on explaining the less common causes without using jargon.

Signs and Symptoms: Good job on explaining cerebral perfusion! I would add that lack of circulation is determined by “no palpable pulse.”

Causes: I would clarify what adequate cardiac output is. Maybe say “adequate perfusion of the organs.” I would explain what v tach, v fib, PEA, and asystole mean.

Mechanism: I got this little explanation of v fib from https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/ventricular-fibrillation/symptoms-causes/syc-20364523. I think it would be helpful to explain this in more simple terms like this. “Ventricular fibrillation is a heart rhythm problem that occurs when the heart beats with rapid, erratic electrical impulses. This causes pumping chambers in your heart (the ventricles) to quiver uselessly, instead of pumping blood. Sometimes triggered by a heart attack, ventricular fibrillation causes your blood pressure to plummet, cutting off blood supply to your vital organs.”

Diagnosis: Good job explaining how cardiac arrest is clinically diagnosed by checking pulses.

Prevention: The only thing I might add to this section is what a “heart-healthy diet” actually is. This is a link I found for a heart-healthy diet from the American heart association https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-eating/eat-smart/nutrition-basics/aha-diet-and-lifestyle-recommendations

Management: Good job adding sources!

Prognosis: I saw you added some resources from 2017 and 2018. Good job!

Epidemiology: I would add what differences there are among different ethnicities as well (e.g. African Americans, Native Americans, Latin Americans, etc.).

Sincerely,

JacknowledgeMD

About the distinctness of ventricular fibrillation and full arrest

My earlier edit was reverted, mainly because I said ventricular fibrillation "tends to lead to" cardiac arrest. The reverter claimed vfib *is* cardiac arrest proper.

This clearly isn't right. I've suffered two hard episodes of first atrial fibrillation, then ventricular tachycardia, and finally outright starting ventricular fibrillation. There was never any threat of death, even if normal heart function had to be restored by synchronized electrical cardioversion. Twice. It's asystole which counts as real death, to be resuscitated from, not vtach or even vfib. *And* it says so in the extant sources of the article, already. Decoy (talk)̃~

" Invariably fatal"?

Yes, it is (almost?) universally fatal if not treated immediately, but this particular wording makes it seem absolute. Decapitation is something which qualifies for that qualification, this one... really doesn't. --181.115.61.74 (talk) 04:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]