Jump to content

Talk:Agglutination (biology): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Merger proposal: Closing; no merge
→‎We: new section
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 19: Line 19:
* '''Oppose''' I agree they cover the same information and that they are start and C class respectively. However I feel both are independently notable concepts (one a process, and one relating to a substance), and to have them in a single article would I think likely result in more confusion for the reader than it's worth, as having them in separate process + thing articles, to me at least, is a very logical division. Because we are not a paper encyclopedia and we are also "not finished", we shouldn't be scared to have these as two separate articles. --[[User:Tom (LT)|Tom (LT)]] ([[User talk:Tom (LT)|talk]]) 05:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' I agree they cover the same information and that they are start and C class respectively. However I feel both are independently notable concepts (one a process, and one relating to a substance), and to have them in a single article would I think likely result in more confusion for the reader than it's worth, as having them in separate process + thing articles, to me at least, is a very logical division. Because we are not a paper encyclopedia and we are also "not finished", we shouldn't be scared to have these as two separate articles. --[[User:Tom (LT)|Tom (LT)]] ([[User talk:Tom (LT)|talk]]) 05:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
:'''Closing''': no merge, given the uncontested objection. [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 19:00, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
:'''Closing''': no merge, given the uncontested objection. [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 19:00, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

== We ==

Yard enough y de [[Special:Contributions/41.13.13.78|41.13.13.78]] ([[User talk:41.13.13.78|talk]]) 07:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:27, 30 October 2021

WikiProject iconPhysiology B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article has been classified as relating to blood.
WikiProject iconMedicine: Hematology-oncology B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force.

Blood grouping

Suggest having a whole section or a separate page on blood grouping. Snowman 17:49, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone

Does anyone know how this relates to the, um, "alternative" practice of looking at your blood cells under a microscope and declaring that you're too stressed if they seem to stick together? WhatamIdoing 06:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could be, as any and all 'phenomena' are called upon to back up these claims, no matter how tangential the connection. Item #3 in the list seems spurious enough to qualify as a part of that belief system.

In-line citations

In-line citations are missing, except for the first sentence of the article. Citation for the 'snuggling together of blood cells to avoid invaders' is painfully absent.

Merger proposal

I propose to merge Agglutinin into Agglutination (biology). Both cover much of the same information and are quite short. Ths17sbu21 (talk) 04:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - Agglutination should be the main topic and that a merge is both appropriate and helpful.  Velella  Velella Talk   15:11, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I agree they cover the same information and that they are start and C class respectively. However I feel both are independently notable concepts (one a process, and one relating to a substance), and to have them in a single article would I think likely result in more confusion for the reader than it's worth, as having them in separate process + thing articles, to me at least, is a very logical division. Because we are not a paper encyclopedia and we are also "not finished", we shouldn't be scared to have these as two separate articles. --Tom (LT) (talk) 05:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Closing: no merge, given the uncontested objection. Klbrain (talk) 19:00, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We

Yard enough y de 41.13.13.78 (talk) 07:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]