Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbourne Revolution FC: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:32, 11 February 2007

Melbourne Revolution FC

Non-notable minor football team. Articles linking from this page about players etc. should be deleted also. Archibald99 23:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Archibald99 00:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Scottmsg 02:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Social indoor soccer team in the Box Hill Indoor Soccer League in Melbourne. No claim to notability. Player articles should be deleted as well. May be case under A7 non-notable organisation. Capitalistroadster 03:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 03:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, in addition to being non-notable, it looks like most of the edits are by their "manager", Jonathan Menner. Lankiveil 04:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Delete -- nn. - Longhair\^talk 05:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
KEEPhello lads, this page shouldnt be deleted because it is set up so people can further learn more about us and who play for us i really dont see the need to delete it, you should maybe spend some time making your own or something before you see the need to go and ask someone elses to be deleted, is it hurting anyone? do you also want me to delete our myspace because were not important enough? all the stats are right all the facts are right, who really cares 19:02, 11 February 2007 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.48.211 (talk • contribs)
KEEP The page is up to and it is providing correct details for anyone who needs to know about indoor football
KEEP I dont feel it is necessary to delete this page as it is providing facts not fiction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.214.14.160 (talk • contribs)
Delete Unless the anons here can show otherwise, this is an article about a non-notable sports team. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 08:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP i really dont see what the problem is with this :S —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.107.48.211 (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Delete not notable.--cj | talk 10:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DElete - division 3 indoor team says it all. - Peripitus (Talk) 10:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless some notability can be established. A less than year old mates team doesn't cut it. Nuttah68 10:26, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Division 3 indoor soccer team? Not notable enough. --Canley 11:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 *'''Delete''' -- nn. - [[User:Longhair|Longhair]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Longhair|talk]]</sup> 05:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 *'''KEEP'''hello lads, this page shouldnt be deleted because it is set up so people can further learn more about us and who play for us  i really dont see the need to delete it, you should maybe spend some time making your own or something before you see the need to go and ask someone elses to be deleted, is it hurting anyone? do you also want me to delete our myspace because were not important enough? all the stats are right all the facts are right, who really cares 19:02, 11 February 2007 {{unsigned|58.107.48.211}}
+*'''KEEP''' The page is up to and it is providing correct details for anyone who needs to know about indoor football
 *'''KEEP''' I dont feel it is necessary to delete this page as it is providing facts not fiction. {{unsigned|203.214.14.160}}
 *'''Delete''' Unless the anons here can show otherwise, this is an article about a [[WP:NOTE|non-notable]] sports team. [[User:NeoChaosX|NeoChaosX]] <font size="1"> ([[User talk:NeoChaosX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/NeoChaosX|walk]])</font> 08:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)