Talk:CryptoPunks: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
David Gerard (talk | contribs) |
Seanbonner (talk | contribs) →History / Controversies: Reply |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Was there any coverage in RSes whatsoever, or just in crypto blogs? If the latter, it doesn't belong here - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 10:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC) |
:Was there any coverage in RSes whatsoever, or just in crypto blogs? If the latter, it doesn't belong here - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 10:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
::I've included a number of sources though out the section including [WP:SELFSOURCE] where the owner of the company has made a statement about what they did, the rest are crypto specific news sites discussing a crypto art project so while they may not be considered RS for geopolitical news they are RS for a crypto specific topic as is detailed here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Inaccuracy#Appendix:_Reliability_in_the_context . None of the sources I've included are "crypto blogs" and your mass deleting the entire section rather than addressing specific details or sources could be considered [WP:VAND]. Perhaps my restructuring of the page confused you so I'll correct that, in the future please address specific points rather than deleting entire sections. [[User:Seanbonner|Seanbonner]] ([[User talk:Seanbonner|talk]]) 16:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Donation to Ukrainian Government == |
== Donation to Ukrainian Government == |
Revision as of 16:35, 10 March 2022
![]() | Articles for creation Start‑class ![]() | |||||||||
|
![]() | Cryptocurrency Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
History / Controversies
These sections should likely be rewritten / combined. I'll try to spend some time on it in the coming days. Seanbonner (talk) 18:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
I've combined these sections for better organization and expanded on the history with additional sources. Seanbonner (talk) 21:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Was there any coverage in RSes whatsoever, or just in crypto blogs? If the latter, it doesn't belong here - David Gerard (talk) 10:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- I've included a number of sources though out the section including [WP:SELFSOURCE] where the owner of the company has made a statement about what they did, the rest are crypto specific news sites discussing a crypto art project so while they may not be considered RS for geopolitical news they are RS for a crypto specific topic as is detailed here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Inaccuracy#Appendix:_Reliability_in_the_context . None of the sources I've included are "crypto blogs" and your mass deleting the entire section rather than addressing specific details or sources could be considered [WP:VAND]. Perhaps my restructuring of the page confused you so I'll correct that, in the future please address specific points rather than deleting entire sections. Seanbonner (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Donation to Ukrainian Government
Hello, Aside all vandalism and all the unreliable edits that have been made after my edit, I now manually reverted all the edits back to mine. I added a more reliable source regarding the CryptoPunk Ukrainian Government donation. I couldn't do so before because my edit was made 1 hour after the news came out, so I couldn't find much more; but now it should do. Thanks. JohnnyCoal (talk) 09:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)