Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pearson (computer scientist): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:16, 16 March 2022

David Pearson (computer scientist)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a vanity article produced by the subject. The sources may not support the statements begin made, or fail to report on the subject with more than a passing mention. An IP claiming to be the subject (24.207.103.36) has asked that it be deleted. _signed,Willondon (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 22:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find any evidence of academic notability in the article or in the academic literature, and I can't find any evidence of general notability among the many bad references in the article or in my own searches. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
SURE YOU HAVE READ THIS ARTICLE, MR EPPSTEIN??

YOU ARE NOT ONE OF PUTIN’S DISINFORMATION FOLK ARE YOU ?

LOOK, I DON’T BELIEVE IN THE INTEGRITY OF WIKI ANYMORE. JUST DELETE THE ARTICLE! Poolroadrunner (talk) 06:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Reads as if written by a PR operative. Claims he has a first class degree for his PhD at Cambridge, but Cambridge does not grade PhDs (correct me if wrong). GS cites hard to identify as there are many with similar names. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]
NO, READ AGAIN. FIRSTS CLASSES CAME FROM IMPERIAL, ETC. EVERYONE KNOWS A PHD IS A PHD! 24.207.103.36 (talk) 03:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Academics and educators|Academics and educators]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|United Kingdom]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 22:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete'''. I can't find any evidence of [[WP:PROF|academic notability]] in the article or in the academic literature, and I can't find any evidence of [[WP:GNG|general notability]] among the many bad references in the article or in my own searches. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 23:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
+*:SURE YOU HAVE READ THIS ARTICLE, MR EPPSTEIN??
+*:YOU ARE NOT ONE OF PUTIN’S DISINFORMATION FOLK ARE YOU ?
+*:LOOK, I DON’T BELIEVE IN THE INTEGRITY OF WIKI ANYMORE. JUST DELETE THE ARTICLE! [[User:Poolroadrunner|Poolroadrunner]] ([[User talk:Poolroadrunner|talk]]) 06:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''. Reads as if written by a PR operative. Claims he has a first class degree for his PhD at Cambridge, but Cambridge does not grade PhDs (correct me if wrong). GS cites hard to identify as there are many with similar names. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 00:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC).
 *:NO, READ AGAIN. FIRSTS CLASSES CAME FROM IMPERIAL, ETC. EVERYONE KNOWS A PHD IS A PHD! [[Special:Contributions/24.207.103.36|24.207.103.36]] ([[User talk:24.207.103.36|talk]]) 03:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)