User talk:Sylvie N: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:55, 19 March 2022

March 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "1,000,000 edits", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it gives off the impression that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. This username may imply that you are going to make a million vandalistic or non-constructive edits. If you really want to, do it slowly… it takes time, but you’ll get there . — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 02:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YO

Adding "American English" to the Shane van Boening article, who is American, is NOT vandalism so DO NOT revert it.!! 70.161.8.90 (talk) 00:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. Sylvie N (talk) ^she/they 00:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dali

Hi, Sylvie. It probably looked like a mistake, but the paragraph I removed was overkill. A link to the main Colossus article is sufficient in this case. I am in the process of overhauling the article; it needs urgent attention before it features on the main page in two days. Would you mind self-reverting? Thanks. --Jimmy Hill's Chin (talk) 01:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I apologize; I've restored your edit. I ask that you write a newer edit summary next time however, as it seemed like blanking. Thanks! Sylvie N (talk) ^she/they 01:07, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! :) Jimmy Hill's Chin (talk) 01:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CollabVM moved to draftspace

Hello! An article you recently created, CollabVM, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can work on the article with minimal disruption and for as long as you need! When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page, or move it back to mainspace. If it is moved to mainspace and still does not indicate its importance or notability with reliable citations, it may be moved back again, or even deleted. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 02:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CollabVM (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rich Smith were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We have seen this draft before. This permutation of it still does not comply with citing Reliable Sources, most are either from the people behind ColabVM or are not relevant to the article. The BleepingComputer article is a passing mention, nothing in depth.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CollabVM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CollabVM, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sylvie N! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I will suggest you to read Wikipedia: Vandalism, because it seems you don't know What marks as vandalism on Wikipedia. 37.111.217.57 (talk) 19:55, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:55, 19 March 2022 edit 37.111.217.57 (talk) →Vandalism: new section Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:55, 19 March 2022 edit undo 37.111.217.57 (talk) No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Next edit →
Line 45:		Line 45:
	== Vandalism ==		== Vandalism ==

	I will suggest you to read [[Wikipedia: Vandalism]], because it seems you don't know What ~~mark~~ vandalism on Wikipedia. [[Special:Contributions/37.111.217.57\|37.111.217.57]] ([[User talk:37.111.217.57\|talk]]) 19:55, 19 March 2022 (UTC)		I will suggest you to read [[Wikipedia: Vandalism]], because it seems you don't know What marks as vandalism on Wikipedia. [[Special:Contributions/37.111.217.57\|37.111.217.57]] ([[User talk:37.111.217.57\|talk]]) 19:55, 19 March 2022 (UTC)