Talk:Everipedia: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:57, 20 March 2022

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS

The article Everipedia, along with other pages relating to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:

Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Remedy instructions and exemptions

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.

With respect to any reverting restrictions:

Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Everipedia was copied or moved into Sam Kazemian with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Everipedia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 28 days

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

speedy keep (withdrawn), April 26 2018, see discussion.
speedy delete, March 21 2017, see discussion.
delete, September 29 2016, see discussion.
no consensus, September 16 2016, see discussion.

Internet C‑class Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Zachary Schwartz (7 February 2019). "Blockchain Wikipedia is a dish best served cold".

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Article tags

@Alexis Jazz: You added tags to this article a few months ago. Would you mind going into more detail about the article's problems? X-Editor (talk) 21:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

X-Editor, where do I even start? This article has a history of manipulation by Everipedians. It's slightly better than it was some time ago, but still pretty bad.
• "Everipedia is a blockchain-based online encyclopedia" Citation needed. I know it's impossible to edit Everipedia without installing some..thing on your computer, but this seems to be used for voting on edits. What is a "blockchain-based online encyclopedia" anyway? I'd say an encyclopedia that stores its content on a blockchain. Is there a reliable independent source that says that's actually what they do? Even if they do, https://everipedia.org/ is clearly not that.
• License: "Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Int'l". Not anymore, I checked recently and wasn't informed of any license when trying to edit.
• "After the blockchain is implemented, the company plans to convert the points into a token currency." and several following lines. I'm planning to build a spaceship. Speculation and daydreams.
• "Everipedia says the blockchain model does not have centralized servers, therefore eliminating the cost of servers." As everipedia.org is reachable with a normal browser this is horseshit.
• "As Everipedia is decentralized via blockchain, Forselius claims that it is not possible for governments to censor Everipedia by its assigned server IP addresses." I'm sure Forselius claims this but it's misleading and horseshit. Governments can target the domain or they can have sufficiently advanced systems (China) for fine grain filtering which is very difficult to get around. We mislead readers by presenting such a dubious claim without an independent source that actually looked into the claim to back it up.
• "Everipedia adapted social media elements such as letting celebrities communicate with fans" Misleading. The source says "Similarly, Wikipedia has no social element to their pages, versus Everipedia has implemented social features that allow, for example, celebrities to share and interact with fans" which shows right away that the source doesn't know what it's talking about, but it also doesn't explain what Everipedia does to accommodate this. This is far too vague and requires a better source.
• "Everipedia reportedly utilized a live Internet bot to monitor Wikipedia for changes, synchronizing such changes but giving preference to local edits on Everipedia." Yeeeeeah sure. And Prince Philip lives.
— Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 01:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not all bad, that Houston Texans roster looks pretty sharp; with all that talent, I think they're going to mature into an NFL powerhouse. Kuru (talk) 01:58, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Everipedia claims they are under a CC BY 4.0 license... But since they are mostly copied from EN WP they cannot be. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Something worth adding to the article

Something that seems to be missing from this article is that Everipedia largely copypastas their articles from wikipedia. I know this claim is largely unsourced, however just go to there website, type any article, and compare that article to Wikipedia’s and you’ll see what I mean. They copy and paste articles from wikipedia into their own, with add very minor changes, and call it a “Everi~~Wiki~~pedia article”. Since the article is clearly made by Everipedians (or just anti-Wikipedians in general), it wouldn’t be surprising if they left this out. If someone can do something that’ll be helpful. 68.97.131.85 (talk) 19:52, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just realized this was already talked about, my bad. 68.97.131.85 (talk) 19:57, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:52, 20 March 2022 edit 68.97.131.85 (talk) →‎Something worth adding to the article: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:57, 20 March 2022 edit undo 68.97.131.85 (talk) →‎Something worth adding to the article: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Something that seems to be missing from this article is that Everipedia largely copypastas their articles from wikipedia. I know this claim is largely unsourced, however just go to there website, type any article, and compare that article to Wikipedia’s and you’ll see what I mean. They copy and paste articles from wikipedia into their own, with add very minor changes, and call it a “Everi<s>Wiki</s>pedia article”. Since the article is clearly made by Everipedians (or just anti-Wikipedians in general), it wouldn’t be surprising if they left this out. If someone can do something that’ll be helpful. [[Special:Contributions/68.97.131.85\|68.97.131.85]] ([[User talk:68.97.131.85\|talk]]) 19:52, 20 March 2022 (UTC)		Something that seems to be missing from this article is that Everipedia largely copypastas their articles from wikipedia. I know this claim is largely unsourced, however just go to there website, type any article, and compare that article to Wikipedia’s and you’ll see what I mean. They copy and paste articles from wikipedia into their own, with add very minor changes, and call it a “Everi<s>Wiki</s>pedia article”. Since the article is clearly made by Everipedians (or just anti-Wikipedians in general), it wouldn’t be surprising if they left this out. If someone can do something that’ll be helpful. [[Special:Contributions/68.97.131.85\|68.97.131.85]] ([[User talk:68.97.131.85\|talk]]) 19:52, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

			:Just realized this was already talked about, my bad. [[Special:Contributions/68.97.131.85\|68.97.131.85]] ([[User talk:68.97.131.85\|talk]]) 19:57, 20 March 2022 (UTC)