Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koenig Institute: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:''A documentary film exploring the impact of the corporation's facilities or products,'' |
:''A documentary film exploring the impact of the corporation's facilities or products,'' |
||
:::4-Significantly covered in [[Al Jazeera]] video news [https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2014/1/18/snowden-cases-indian-connection Al Jazeera report]. [[User:RPSkokie|RPSkokie]] ([[User talk:RPSkokie|talk]]) 01:51, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |
:::4-Significantly covered in [[Al Jazeera]] video news [https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2014/1/18/snowden-cases-indian-connection Al Jazeera report]. [[User:RPSkokie|RPSkokie]] ([[User talk:RPSkokie|talk]]) 01:51, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' Please describe 'how' the given sources meet [[WP:CORPDEPTH]]. Simply listing sources and claiming that they meet CORPDEPTH doesn't have a lot of value. Will be helpful if you can specifically highlight which part of the sources meet CORPDEPTH. TOI is not even counted as a full [[WP:RS]] so that's out. Foreignpolicy.com source doesn't have in depth discussion or analysis of Koenig institute. Just a bunch of quotes from spokespersons. Please recall that for CORPDEPTH we need independent analysis, discussion and commentary. Al Jazeera is a generic report that they seem to have filed after this case. No traces of independent discussion of Koenig. In your Harvard source, Koening is mentioned only twice. That's passing mention at best, far away from significant coverage, let alone CORPDEPTH. [[User:Nomadicghumakkad|Nomadicghumakkad]] ([[User talk:Nomadicghumakkad|talk]]) 22:03, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:03, 21 April 2022
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Koenig Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH miserably. Most of the RS hinges on Edward Snowden coming to India to do something here. That's not in-depth of the subject but of them. Also read the language. Campus is 18,000 sqft. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 11:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 11:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 11:28, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Education. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Contested soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:39, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: Providing few significant sources of substantial coverage which satisfies WP:CORPDEPTH;
- A news article discussing a prolonged controversy
- A scholarly article, a book passage, or ongoing media coverage focusing on a product or organization
- 3-Hero or Traitor Edward Snowden and the NSA Spying Program Main case study page, Author: Laura Winig, Case Number: 2018.0
- Publication Date: April 30, 2014, Faculty Lead: Christopher Robichaud, Harvard Kennedy School, Hosted:University of Central Florida
- A documentary film exploring the impact of the corporation's facilities or products,
- 4-Significantly covered in Al Jazeera video news Al Jazeera report. RPSkokie (talk) 01:51, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Please describe 'how' the given sources meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Simply listing sources and claiming that they meet CORPDEPTH doesn't have a lot of value. Will be helpful if you can specifically highlight which part of the sources meet CORPDEPTH. TOI is not even counted as a full WP:RS so that's out. Foreignpolicy.com source doesn't have in depth discussion or analysis of Koenig institute. Just a bunch of quotes from spokespersons. Please recall that for CORPDEPTH we need independent analysis, discussion and commentary. Al Jazeera is a generic report that they seem to have filed after this case. No traces of independent discussion of Koenig. In your Harvard source, Koening is mentioned only twice. That's passing mention at best, far away from significant coverage, let alone CORPDEPTH. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 22:03, 21 April 2022 (UTC)