Jump to content

User talk:GiantSnowman: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 24: Line 24:


:Awful. I have warned both users. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 15:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
:Awful. I have warned both users. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 15:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

[[User:Seasider53]], who could not care less about your warning, has reverted me in two articles where i actually ADDED REFS!! --[[Special:Contributions/2001:8A0:767B:9C00:ECBA:8C6A:2360:11D7|2001:8A0:767B:9C00:ECBA:8C6A:2360:11D7]] ([[User talk:2001:8A0:767B:9C00:ECBA:8C6A:2360:11D7|talk]]) 21:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:46, 29 May 2022

Notice

The article Emmerson Brooks-Meade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maurice Cooreman

I have a funeral letter from Maurice Cooreman .. where can I mail this to ? Rafa009 (talk) 12:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(by talk reader) @Rafa009: Wikipedia does not compile offline sources and we do not present original research. Please also keep in mind that we only publish what is verifiable as we care not for what is actually true. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As I have already told you, Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. It seems odd that Mr Cooreman would have died and no media outlet reported it. If you have evidence to the contrary, please consider using WP:OTRS. GiantSnowman 13:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On a scale of one too ten, how bad is this page in your edit-war book!! page history :/ Govvy (talk) 15:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awful. I have warned both users. GiantSnowman 15:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Seasider53, who could not care less about your warning, has reverted me in two articles where i actually ADDED REFS!! --2001:8A0:767B:9C00:ECBA:8C6A:2360:11D7 (talk) 21:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]