User talk:Hey man im josh: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:48, 31 May 2022

Archives

Archive 1

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 06:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which NFL team.DL you support?

honest question just wondering.

2A01:4C8:C0A:5274:FB1A:8F90:68BB:3CF0 (talk) 17:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more of a player follower than a team follower, but perhaps that's because I grew up a Detroit Lions fan. I considered myself to have been traded with Matt Stafford to the Rams last season and enjoyed seeing him have some success outside of Detroit. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:23, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

buddy. here now.

relax with the moderation of allihies, we are a dedicated team of allihies history experts and your unexperienced views of the area are stopping us from fixing the page. I am a sigma male. I date 20 women at once, doubt you ever smelled a fanny before. I also eat ass. Women love me, they probably dont even look at you. Go to the gym. Touch grass. I am a god to your puny little wikipedia loving mortal mind. I have a j0b that i earn atleast 10 dollars an hour in. you sit in ur basement touching urself to articles. while i am out every night kissing WOMEN. good day to you sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Display333 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... Wow, just wow. Can't imagine, even in a joking manner while anonymous, submitting this comment anywhere online. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering where all the interesting people were on Wikipedia. They are right though, you have to slow down. Hording all the vandals and trolls here (lol). This is my laugh for the day. Happy editing! --ARose Wolf 18:15, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you stalking me

All of my edits are constructive. Please stop. I'll call God if you don't stop.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.213.7.133 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I just love to revert vandalism, especially when it's putting my name into articles. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there!

See you a lot patrolling recent changes. Just wanted to say I'm glad that you can help with the cleaning! CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 16:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @CollectiveSolidarity, thank you, I appreciate it! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:42, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Enjoy this goat for being a speedy vandal catcher!

Taxin609 (Talk To Me) 16:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Taxin609: OH MY GOD I LOVE IT SO MUCH! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LOL Taxin609 (Talk To Me) 16:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Hey man im josh. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. — TNT (talk • she/her) 13:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks so much! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:52, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Riley Morris

Hi Josh. I wanted to let you know that I created an article on Riley Morris, which you requested earlier this year. BTW, great work on all that anti-vandalism stuff. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:10, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @BeanieFan11, that's awesome, I'm looking forward to reading it after I catch up from my absence. Thanks so much, I appreciate the kind words :) Hey man im josh (talk) 11:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Josh, why you no respond :’’’( Ryan.halladay (talk) 23:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hello boss how are you? I want to know where is the page of that's Maldives women's national under-20 football team which you reviewed? Thanks. MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 13:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @MD Hydrogen 123,

You received the notification that a page had been reviewed because you were the original creator of the page. I see from the edit history that it was changed to a redirect by a user named Fram. I simply evaluated whether it was a valid redirect, not whether the page should be a redirect or not. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now what plan the page was not visible? MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 13:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're asking me. Can you try rephrasing your question for me? Hey man im josh (talk) 13:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

Hello Hey man im josh,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 825 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 851 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Authority control

Hello! I am no expert on that tag. Looks like there are a lot of templates on those articles in question. I have been trying to trim content on those pages outside of references but it does hardly anything to the size of the articles. Anyway, would moving the template above the other templates be a solution? Once again, I have no idea the processes on that template and how it is supposed to work. I want to commend you for your efforts on this site and your numerous contributions. Red Director (talk) 20:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Red Director,

I'm just following up now and it looks like you guys got it figured out on Tom Brady's talk page. I guess it really was just the size of the articles causing the issue. Aw shucks, thanks so much for your kind words, it means a lot coming from someone who makes such great contributions in both quality and quantity! Hey man im josh (talk) 09:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I left a discussion on the talk pages of both Eric Berry and Robert Griffin III regarding how they should be addressed in the lead. I was wondering if this is something you could take a look at if you have the chance because I would like to know your input here. The only reason i’m addressing this directly to your talk page is because it has been about a week since I added those discussions and have heard nothing from another user. I also know that you are very active in the editing of football related pages. Thanks. Bears247 (talk) 22:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Bears247, thanks for reaching out.

I took a look at the two pages and I made a change to each of them. I think in these cases we don't need to specify that they're "former" players and that might be a good compromise for those who are on each side of the discussion. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	keep seing your anti-vandalism reverts in RC :) Theo (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's always a treat when someone takes notice and sends a Barnstar my way. Thank you so much! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Koko (Gorilla) article

I do not want to be engaged in a "edit war" with you but I'm not seeing any explanation for why the "Nipple fixation" element of the article isn't just outright removed. People seem perfectly okay with it being represented via text for anyone to read but somehow, putting it in her info box is too far? If the information is so harmful to her legacy, it shouldn't be on the article to begin with. None of my efforts breach anything that is not accurate to the article itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C4E:133F:F2CB:E57B:CEF6:95AD:6AD2 (talk) 18:33, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @2600:6C4E:133F:F2CB:E57B:CEF6:95AD:6AD2,

Thank you for discussing this on a talk page instead of reverting or re-adding. While there was instances of nipple fascination, that's definitely not what Koko is known for. Koko was, primarily, known for her sign language, intelligence, and for her interest in other animals. If you were to search "what is Koko the gorilla known for" you would not find the information about nipple fixation in most of the links that discuss her. Including the nipple fixation in the article is different from including it in the portion of the infobox for what she's best known for. Regarding the information potentially being harmful to her legacy, Wikipedia is not censored, it's simply about the "known for" section of the infobox. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	I'd need to send too many thanks to cover this star. You're always appreciated. Bringingthewood (talk) 23:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks so much @Bringingthewood! I appreciate the barnstar and that you've stuck around :) Hey man im josh (talk) 11:17, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. You deserve it!

And I thank YOU for that. Bringingthewood (talk) 03:44, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Thank you; beat me to it. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 17:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and page protection

Both of us have made requests for this article to be protected. Should we combine our arguments or should one of us remove our requests? Perhaps we should leave it as is? Graearms (talk) 19:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Graearms we can just leave it, there's no need to combine. The admins will get to the requests eventually and it doesn't speed things up or help in any way that I'm aware of to have ours combined. In the future tho, it's best to check if there's already a request submitted so that we don't end up submitting two. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, also thanks for your other contributions to Wikipedia, you appear to be a very helpful editor. Graearms (talk) 20:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words, I appreciate it :) Hey man im josh (talk) 21:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clearing up misunderstandings

Bruh you’re the one who’s responded to the 3 requests and I’m just trying to notify you or anyone else that there’s a missing award that should be added to the awards and honors section do you think I’m lying or something it’s a Real award one search and boom you’ll see him holding it and accepting it on video you kept talking about everything but the award which was my main focus. 47.157.236.115 (talk) 19:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, and am still confused about, why are you calling me specifically out for this? I'm under no obligation to add anything to an article, but I responded to a point of your talk page posts. As mentioned, just because you haven't gotten an answer that you would like doesn't mean you keep making posts about the same issue by creating new sections. Patience and further discussion under the existing section is the way to go, not creating new sections.

I carry no weight here, I'm not stopping anybody else from adding anything to that article, there are a lot of others who have seen your posts on the talk page. I responded to your point in which you wanted people's opinions added to the article. Ronaldo calling Brady the GOAT doesn't belong in the article, that's what I've addressed. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:28, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Even more misunderstandings I guess

No I’m not calling you out I’m asking why you’re ignoring the award to than talk about something that wasn’t as relevant as the main subject even I said I didn’t care about the quote but rather there being a missing piece to the list of achievements/ awards and honors section of Tom at no point did I call you out but rather point out facts about the Award and when he got it and when it was created I’d understand if I was lying but that’s sadly not the truth of the matter and hopefully someone does add it Seeing as how it’s a real thing. 47.157.236.115 (talk) 19:48, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 173: / Line 173: @@
 :As I said, and am still confused about, why are you calling me specifically out for this? I'm under no obligation to add anything to an article, but I responded to a point of your talk page posts. As mentioned, just because you haven't gotten an answer that you would like doesn't mean you keep making posts about the same issue by creating new sections. Patience and further discussion under the existing section is the way to go, not creating new sections.
 :I carry no weight here, I'm not stopping anybody else from adding anything to that article, there are a lot of others who have seen your posts on the talk page. I responded to your point in which you wanted people's opinions added to the article. Ronaldo calling Brady the GOAT doesn't belong in the article, that's what I've addressed. [[User:Hey man im josh|Hey man im josh]] ([[User talk:Hey man im josh#top|talk]]) 19:28, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
+== Even more misunderstandings I guess ==
+No I’m not calling you out I’m asking why you’re ignoring the award to than talk about something that wasn’t as relevant as the main subject even I said I didn’t care about the quote but rather there being a missing piece to the list of achievements/ awards and honors section of Tom at no point did I call you out but rather point out facts about the Award and when he got it and when it was created I’d understand if I was lying but that’s sadly not the truth of the matter and hopefully someone does add it Seeing as how it’s a real thing. [[Special:Contributions/47.157.236.115|47.157.236.115]] ([[User talk:47.157.236.115|talk]]) 19:48, 31 May 2022 (UTC)