Jump to content

Talk:Kherson: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 86.13.242.127 - "Russian name...: "
Line 51: Line 51:


This section does not make sense. For one can not occupy a city that one founded to begin with.
This section does not make sense. For one can not occupy a city that one founded to begin with.

Agreed, plus the Kiev government has no control over the area and the area has petitioned to join the Russian Federation. Article needs major restructuring, perhaps after Kherson eventually joins Russia.

Revision as of 21:58, 18 June 2022

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconUkraine Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCities Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Geology

Close to Kherson is an area that looks very strange from satellite: (46°36′02″N 33°02′23″E / 46.60056°N 33.03972°E / 46.60056; 33.03972). It looks like a mining area.

I couldn't find that map there. Please, give a direct link. Sashazlv 01:10, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
New to wikipedia, didnt know about the 'discussion' tab. Ok, here it is http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=46.600556,33.039722&spn=0.3,0.3&t=k. If you zoom out a bit, you can really see that it looks strange.

This is not a mining area, but an area with sand dunes, which are partly covered by forests which have been planted since the 1950ies.

Skluesener

Founder

Contradicts with the Gannibal article, which says Kherson was founded by one of his sons.

Twin Cities

The previous list from 04:16 1 September 2010‎ by 68.97.46.189 was pure fantasy. None of the cities mentioned have listed Kherson among their twin cities on the respective main entries. Also, I have searched the archive for Oslo municipality and can find no mention of Kherson ever having been a twin city (they abolished twin cities some years ago, then having only agreements with Madison, WI, USA). They currently have cooperation agreements with some cities and regions, but not Kherson. --Geira (talk) 14:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

Please link to the disambiguation page Kherson (disambiguation)

Please add the hatnote

{{about|the city|other uses|Kherson (disambiguation)}}

-- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:49, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No "Control", not "Controlled by"

Territory being occupied during an ongoing military aggression on a country is NOT the same as "Control". Stop putting it into the infobox of this or any other city. It is also a misuse of "Smaller parts" group of parameters in "Infobox settlement" template. Flipping Switches (talk) 18:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template does not have a field "Control" nor "Occupied by". Please do not misuse inappropriate fields. Oleksandr Master (talk) 19:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you add the fields in that case? It can't be too hard. 46.132.47.156 (talk) 18:35, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Russian name...

I'm not sure when the Russian name/pronunciation was removed, by whom, or why, but the majority of the population there speaks Russian as their main language, so even if it weren't for the fact that it's now under Russian control, it'd still make sense to include that. The only reason I can think of for why it was removed (I found it in the history) is for political/nationalistic reasons, but this doesn't fit with NPOV. -2003:CA:874F:BB68:55F0:1353:3A3F:73E7 (talk) 20:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, you did a badspeak. Your IP is now marked as "russian bot" status. 2A00:23C4:4EE0:A201:15E9:7F09:B7E0:8F1E (talk) 20:55, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Restored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.13.242.127 (talk) 15:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Russian occupation" section

This section does not make sense. For one can not occupy a city that one founded to begin with.

Agreed, plus the Kiev government has no control over the area and the area has petitioned to join the Russian Federation. Article needs major restructuring, perhaps after Kherson eventually joins Russia.