Talk:Kazakh alphabets: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:44, 9 July 2022

Writing systems B‑class High‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Central Asia Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Asia portal Kazakh alphabets is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Janga

It seems wrong, to me, that two different letters are transcribed equally in janga system.

Қ қ ق 	Q q  Kh kh
Х х ح 	X x  Kh kh

I suppose the first one is wrong, as Kh as a transliteration of X is the usual.

--80.33.152.28 13:03, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kazakh uses Cyrillic Small Letter Byelorussian-Ukrainian I (U+0456), but and why the uppercase corresponds to Turkish Latin letter I with dot above (U+0130) ? (kk:Қазақ кирилл әліпбиі uses Cyrillic Capital Letter Byelorussian-Ukrainian I (U+0406).) Can anyone confirm it? Also see http://www.primavista.ru/dictionary/abc/kazakh.htm -Hello World! 13:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. Fixed. Also is removed unofficial proprietary scripts.--AlefZet 16:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please translate

There is lots of interesting history of the Kazakh alphabet and its bizarre journey through the arabic, latin, and cyrillic scripts. I'm no expert in this, but the Russian article (featured!) seems to have lots of this info (I don't read Russian well). Can somebody do at least a rough translation? Staecker 18:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have done what I can translate :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.51.126 (talk) 07:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sarsen Amanzholovich Amanzholov

I'd like to see an article on this person - who developed the alphbet.

Yours truly, --Ludvikus 22:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Book on the above

  EVP Order Number 	O2007123
  Author(s) 	Amanzholov, Sarsen Amanzholovich
  City 	Almaty
  Country 	Kazakhstan
  Language 	Russian
  ISBN 996507173X
  Date Publication 	2002
  Publisher 	Ghylym
  Subject 	Humanities
  Languages/Linguistics
  Kazakhstan
  Cover Type 	Hard cover
  Pages 	366

Yours truly, --Ludvikus 23:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kazakh Scouting

Can someone render Dayyin Bol (Be Prepared), the Scout Motto, into Kazakh Cyrillic? Thanks! Chris 15:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go: Дайын бол. Selerian (talk) 15:18, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sotsijaldy qazaqstan.jpg

Image:Sotsijaldy qazaqstan.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced version of romanisation?

Who uses the "Advanced version of romanisation" as given on this page? It looks like an Uzbek inspired latinization, but as far as I am aware, this isn't the Kazakhstan government's 2000s proposed latin script. As Cyrillic is official in the country, some justification for the inclusion of "Advanced version of romanisation" in this article should be given. languagegeek (talk) 14:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Historical alphabets must be removed from the page

The part about Historical alphabets should be removed. It deals with old Turkic alphabets which are not specifically related to Kazakh. Even under the assumption that Crimean kipchak and Kazakh are related, it does not mean that Kazakhs come from the group of Kipchaks who settled in Crimeans... At least, sources must be mentioned. --Qyzylqarga (talk) 20:37, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Missing letters in correspondence chart

What happened to the letters Ё, Ц, etc. in the 2017 Latin script? Currently these are blank in the table. 2601:644:1:B7CB:6598:4AE7:81E6:AFB7 (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those letters have no equivalents in the new Latin script, and will be written using a combination of other letters. Exactly which combinations will be used is currently being decided by official linguists in Kazakhstan. But probably Ё will become IO, and Ц will become TS. The reason these letters have not been included in the new alphabet is because these letters were not present in Kazakh before it was switched to Cyrillic, and are not used in any native Kazakh words. These are letters specific to the Russian alphabet and are only seen in words borrowed from the Russian language. Selerian (talk) 15:18, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Over-hasty editing of this page

I object to the way this page has been hastily written to change everything to the apostrophe romanization. There is an upswell of resistance to it in favour of another more "Turkic" alphabet. If nothing, both of these should be given on this page. The new one is controversial, and while "decreed" has not been implemented -- Evertype·✆ 12:57, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feb 2018 Alphabet

If someone wants to make the update, the newest revision of the alphabet as announced yesterday is available here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2018_Kazakh_Latin_Alphabet.png Trey314159 (talk) 17:02, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About the letter I

Why is there a dotted and dotless minuscule i while the capital I is not differentiated? Malurian123 18:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes, the capital I represents two different letters and is not differentiated. My understanding is that the Kazakh linguists looked at the Turkish alphabet and thought that it was too weird/inconvenient to have Iı and İi, and instead preferred to have at least one letter Ii that capitalizes the same way as in English. The drawback of their decision is of course that when the letters ı and i are capitalized, they now look identical as I and I. Which of the two letters is used will need to be determined from context. Selerian (talk) 15:18, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yet ANOTHER revision.

https://astanatimes.com/2019/11/fourth-version-of-kazakh-latin-script-will-preserve-language-purity-linguists-say/ ― Дрейгорич / Dreigorich Talk 18:56, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If I recall correctly, this was also the first version, wasn't it? 85.163.122.254 (talk) 23:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More Tatar

Preqono loçañ

Bötorat snartäcäl hopüğil

2601:C6:C580:11A0:F11D:49D:98EA:5883 (talk) 23:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Çuroqänim

Duşomeñ päkäm

C with cedille missing?

It appears that the C with cedille was dropped from the two most recent versions of the latin script (Jan 2021 and Apr 2021). This is also the case in the reference from the Astana Times. Is the plan to replace this with T and S with cedille?--2A02:8071:3EC8:1800:ADDC:1D3:BFA3:EDD1 (talk) 14:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone explain the policy for letters я, ё, ю, ъ, ь, э, ц, ч and щ?

These letters have been used in the current Cyrillic set and not all letters just in loanwords.

чек -> şek? объектив -> obektiv? юриспруденция -> ürisprudensia? Anatoli (talk) 04:44, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 106: / Line 106: @@
 It appears that the C with cedille was dropped from the two most recent versions of the latin script (Jan 2021 and Apr 2021). This is also the case in the reference from the Astana Times. Is the plan to replace this with T and S with cedille?--[[Special:Contributions/2A02:8071:3EC8:1800:ADDC:1D3:BFA3:EDD1|2A02:8071:3EC8:1800:ADDC:1D3:BFA3:EDD1]] ([[User talk:2A02:8071:3EC8:1800:ADDC:1D3:BFA3:EDD1|talk]]) 14:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
+== Can someone explain the policy for letters я, ё, ю, ъ, ь, э, ц, ч and щ? ==
+These letters have been used in the current Cyrillic set and not all letters just in loanwords.
+чек -> şek?
+объектив -> obektiv?
+юриспруденция -> ürisprudensia? [[User:Atitarev|Anatoli]] ([[User talk:Atitarev|talk]]) 04:44, 9 July 2022 (UTC)